Don’t confuse “organised religion” with believing in something more powerful than oneself.
The lucky ones among us have some profound experience in life that convinces us that we’re more than just an erect ape on this Earth.
The unlucky ones will always be looking for proof that never comes - because it’s not and can’t be recognised as proof when it does.
The Brave ones have decided there is no proof to be had, and think those that have had the experience they have not as being in some way “weak minded”.
I’ve rubbed shoulders with a lot of scientists over the years (my first job being working in a lab as well) and I’d suggest that the spread of atheists/agnostics/organised religion attending/deist/privately religious is the same as in many other industries that involved exposure to said establishments.
Among the elite, Atheism rises, because it’s a good way of keeping the status quo in one’s life.
Among the lower classes, Atheism doesn’t do so well, because one has possibly excluded oneself from areas of social activity (such as Weddings in Church, Bar Mitzvahs, Baptisms, etc) that mean that elevation isn’t likely to come from the depleted other areas of life experienced by the average manual working bod.
Therefore it’s “brave” to be Atheist when working class, and “brave” to be religious when upper class… - It’s because you’ll get abused by others alongside you whom you don’t fit in with.
Likewise,
Compare this all to being “agnostic” which is just sitting on the fence, and makes you no friends above or below, and leaves you wide open to being recruited by anyone who can impress one in a more “Earthly” fashion. Not good.
Let’s also not confuse the Agnostics who “call” themselves “Atheists” but since they have no actual conviction in their own lack of belief, they are nothing more than the worse kind of agnostic. Someone who doesn’t want to side anywhere, and will end up being ignored by all. There’s more UFO spotters, David Ike and Fortean Times readers who are really “rank and file agnostic” than there are sincere atheists or religious people who prefer basing life’s decisions on the experiences that life has already (…or will in the future!) give them.
Getting back to the topic - Do Scots believe in the UK, or would they rather just get shot of being “tied to the rest of the British Isles”?
Scotland has a lot of Catholics, and I think outside the big cities, a lot less Atheists than down here in Sassenach land.
You can’t say “God bless an independent Scotland!” if you don’t believe in God, but you can say “Dammit!” regardless of what you believe if the poll ends up going Cameron’s “no” way, which would make that idiot unstoppable down here next year, a prospect that fills me with dread.
Not being Scottish (but sometimes confused with one from having a Scottish name…) I’m neutral as to the rights and wrongs of them leaving the UK - as far as they are concerned. I think the UK will be poorer without them though… Didn’t people confuse Tony Blair with being a Sassenach because he spoke like one btw?
The only part of me actually in favour of a “yes” vote is that it would spread the north-of-the-border Conservative dearth down here, where it would come in much appreciated good time for next year’s election… No minor party is going to win enough seats to make a difference unless the Tories lose a HUGE number of seats, perhaps over the devolution mishandling as it will be seen, should the vote go the “yes” way…