newmercman:
So Carryfast, instead of blaming the Governments of the World, how exactly would high wages for life, including pensions work exactly?
As I see it if the 1st generation earn $100, the second generation $150 etc etc, by the time the third generation start earning $200 the pension costs of the previous (still living) retirees of will mean that wage and pension costs combined will be $450 per employee.
That’s a lot of money to find, so whatever the workers are making will have to have its price raised, therefore devaluing the wages/pension. It is robbing Peter to pay Paul and it doesn’t work.
Look at Ford, who you regard as the champion of paying the workforce enough money to buy the cars they build. It worked well…until the pension costs eroded all the profits of the cars…as I said, it’s a pyramid scheme!
It came to the point that production was moved away from Detroit (for all the big three) into non union states or over the border into Mexico. That didn’t do the UAW a lot of good long term, unless I’m missing something?
The answer to the problem of low wages in transport doesn’t exist. The job is easy, it doesn’t require any special skills, other than driving, which is not too difficult. Granted, not everyone could drive a lorry, but many people can. Old timer skills such as route planning, load securement, using common sense or initiative are mostly surplus to requirements now. Everything is done to ‘company policy’
So a driver with 40yrs experience offers nothing more than someone with the ink still wet on their licence to a ‘logistics provider’
Blimey nmm the irony of what you’re saying is unbelievable considering that you’ve left the mess here to work in ( what remains of ) that North American economy which those Ford workers in the UAW amongst others built for themselves which is obviously already sinking and isn’t going to survive as they knew it in the long term assuming that those with your ideas are allowed to keep running the show.IE your whole reasoning for being there is actually dependent on the last line of defence in the form of protection of the North American road transport industry from free market competition with the Mexican one which is of course ( rightly ) the policy of what remains of the North American union movement but paradoxically you believe in an ideology that opposes it.
I’m betting that you’d have to rethink your economic situation there ‘if’/when the North American road transport market is opened up to the Mexicans in the form of unlimited cabotage operations throughout the NAFTA countries and the North American labour market as a whole is subject to an open door immigration policy for Mexican immigration.In which your argument seems to me to be based on one of turkeys voting for Christmas.Just as in the case of all those working class voters for the Thatcherite and Reaganite cause at the end of the 1970’s.
As for driving a truck for a living the idea of guvnors spending a pound,in the case of buying and maintaining automated gearboxes etc etc,to save themselves a penny in labour costs for decent drivers,let alone the idea of reducing incomes to the level where no one can afford to be able to afford to consume the products which industry is turning out,and eventually making a large part of the workforce redundant anyway in favour of robots,says everything about the fact that your ideas,as I said,will just mean that the whole capitalist system,and obviously all those economies which are dependent on it,will destroy itself.Bearing in mind that there are plenty of other jobs that have been de skilled or made less labour intensive than previously.
In which case the issue of pension provision will be the last problem which people will need to worry about although even that is totally dependent on the incomes which workers can earn during their working years.It’s just that such a suicidal collapse in the ecomic system will probably mean that many people and their families would freeze,starve,or die of some medical condition that they won’t be able to afford to have cured,long before their retirement age.
Therefore your whole argument seems to me to be one of turkeys voting for christmas just as all those working class voters for the Thatcherite and Reaganite cause did at the end of the 1970’s.As they say be careful what you wish for.
However ‘if’ you’re right then train drivers would obviously be facing exactly the same issues as truck drivers are even at this point in time.But no surprise thay aren’t,including their retirement provision,and the reason for that is that they’ve got a much stronger union ethic than truck drivers generally have.