Can’t see Europe being let put in a peacekeeping force into Ukraine
They can’t afford to fund Ukraine either and they will never go to war with Russia, it looks like it’s trump’s way or nothing , unfortunately for Ukraine
Maybe you should have watched it all after all then eh?
Why tf should I sit here explaining it to you…watch it yourself.
I fully expect whatever it says your led by the nose politics and agenda would refute it’s authenticity so what’s the point in pursuing it with you other than to give you another chance to flatter your ego with smart arse retorts.
Because, that is how forums work.
Lots of people post videos and other links. (you spend half your time moaning there are too many and the other half posting more!)
But if challenged on what I post I choose to re[[ly and defend ny choice or admit it’s flaws.
I sometimes explain a video in advance.
If I want to see hours of GBN I can find it for myself.
You said you agree with the speaker.
I say he is using double speak.
You go to the “Fox and Grapes”.
And that is exactly the type of post from you when I know I have pi55ed you off. 
Yep reckon that is about the size of it mate.
It will be disastrous if we are involved in any war with Russia…especially without US backing.
(I’ll find a GBN link to verify it. )
So the point scoring you were complaining of earlier.
And that one.
Rob 2 Franglais nil (points)
Yep I know…I’m annoying.
It will also be disastrous if we let Putain get away with the invasion of Ukraine.
There are no good options on the table. All involve risk.
Apparently mr trump would not agree with that, unfortunately they only have trump’s big secret peace deal that nobody knows anything about
J D Vance
“Some random country that hasn’t fought a war in 30 or 40 years”
Who in that country will have feelings of patriotism against that?
Who will dismiss those feelings as “sentimentality”? MSN
He’s some piece of work
Can he not make a statement without insulting someone
Yes we have coveted that one and done it to death.
So lets be constructive and practical an look for one of those options that are sensible, that does not involve taking anymore life…instead of just ridiculing an individual .
What am I missing here?
What options do not risk lives?
None of them…
But why favour and champion on here those that could cost the most lives?
Like prolonging the war,.and to send in a what is derisory called a ‘peacekeeping’ force of OUR soldiers, especially when the main agressor will not recognise them as such, due to lack of US intervention, resulting in deaths of our soldiers.
We have done this to death as I said, best to observe and leave it to the (so called) experts.
It brought Thatcher back from the wilderness.
So how many experts say that Tump is doing a good job regards Ukraine I wonder?
In recent days I have heard various UK Military and Intelligence officers, from the UK and some from the US who have worked with Trump, and UK and European politicians form all parties (except one) criticise Trump more than praise him.
Vance and some other MAGA praise Trump, but experts?
It dont matter anymore mate,.seems that Zelensky has renagued and is willing to work for peace under Trump .
Bet that smarts with one or two on here.
I’ll get prepared and give Billy a shout.
RENEGUE : to go back on a promise, undertaking, or contract:
So what has Zelensky said or done to break any promise or undertaking?
Oh ffs give it rest will ya, you are starting to bore me now.
‘To not do what one previously said they would do or vice versa’…go back on.
He walked out of the meeting which suggested he did not agree with going for peace with Trump.
But to pander to your childish pedantry and obtusiveness no he did not verbally say it, but he sure as hell displayed it by walking away.
Now he is agreeing to talks for peace.
Grow up ffs.
I’ll warrant that there are plenty of maimed British servicemen from Afghanistan who’d love to take vance’s head off