Scania V8s, the modern urban myth?

[zb]
anorak:

Carryfast:

bma.finland:
hello carryfast,what do you put up against the SCANIA V 8 :question: :question: :question: :question: ,can,t wait, hej benkku

KW Aerodyne with an 8V92 in 475 horsepower spec against it’s 1970’s Scania V8 counterpart. :smiling_imp: :wink:

The 141 had a far more efficient engine (210g/kWh @ 1500rpm, IIRC). The spec sheets, numerous magazine roadtests and its popularity amongst profit-making hauliers across Europe support this. The only European operators of the other vehicle were cowboy-hatted dreamers, in their dreams.

The question is how much power was the 141 putting out at 1,500 rpm.No one is saying that the thing wasn’t just about one of the best engines available at the time but it’s wrong to say that it had no rivals which were arguably as good.Such as the Merc (when they eventually decided to turbocharge it) and the FIAT while the North American and Colonial markets show that both the CAT and Detroit V8’s were there either hauling Ozzie roadtrains across the outback etc or running around the small single carraiageway roads of NZ or running at around 90 mph + coast to coast in the States.But reletively far fewer,if any,Scania V8’s in those markets. :bulb:

Carryfast:

[zb]
anorak:

Carryfast:

bma.finland:
hello carryfast,what do you put up against the SCANIA V 8 :question: :question: :question: :question: ,can,t wait, hej benkku

KW Aerodyne with an 8V92 in 475 horsepower spec against it’s 1970’s Scania V8 counterpart. :smiling_imp: :wink:

The 141 had a far more efficient engine (210g/kWh @ 1500rpm, IIRC). The spec sheets, numerous magazine roadtests and its popularity amongst profit-making hauliers across Europe support this. The only European operators of the other vehicle were cowboy-hatted dreamers, in their dreams.

The question is how much power was the 141 putting out at 1,500 rpm.No one is saying that the thing wasn’t just about one of the best engines available at the time but it’s wrong to say that it had no rivals which were arguably as good.Such as the Merc (when they eventually decided to turbocharge it) and the FIAT while the North American and Colonial markets show that both the CAT and Detroit V8’s were there either hauling Ozzie roadtrains across the outback etc or running around the small single carraiageway roads of NZ or running at around 90 mph + coast to coast in the States.But reletively far fewer,if any,Scania V8’s in those markets. :bulb:

We had a 480 Turbostar that was more than a match for the 143s on route to Italy, but the Ivecos just dropped in bits whereas the 143s just kept going

ramone:

Carryfast:

[zb]
anorak:

Carryfast:

bma.finland:
hello carryfast,what do you put up against the SCANIA V 8 :question: :question: :question: :question: ,can,t wait, hej benkku

KW Aerodyne with an 8V92 in 475 horsepower spec against it’s 1970’s Scania V8 counterpart. :smiling_imp: :wink:

The 141 had a far more efficient engine (210g/kWh @ 1500rpm, IIRC). The spec sheets, numerous magazine roadtests and its popularity amongst profit-making hauliers across Europe support this. The only European operators of the other vehicle were cowboy-hatted dreamers, in their dreams.

The question is how much power was the 141 putting out at 1,500 rpm.No one is saying that the thing wasn’t just about one of the best engines available at the time but it’s wrong to say that it had no rivals which were arguably as good.Such as the Merc (when they eventually decided to turbocharge it) and the FIAT while the North American and Colonial markets show that both the CAT and Detroit V8’s were there either hauling Ozzie roadtrains across the outback etc or running around the small single carraiageway roads of NZ or running at around 90 mph + coast to coast in the States.But reletively far fewer,if any,Scania V8’s in those markets. :bulb:

We had a 480 Turbostar that was more than a match for the 143s on route to Italy, but the Ivecos just dropped in bits whereas the 143s just kept going

Maybe,was that everything except the engine :question: .But I said on the FIAT V8 topic it’s the Italian way that you you buy a brilliant engine but everything else is free so you can’t expect much more than for it to all fall to bits. :open_mouth: :smiling_imp: :laughing:

bma.finland:

The question is was it still able to do this in 2007. :wink:

youtube.com/watch?v=cuV4b6Y_oEA

and why not :question: you can hold it in action for a long time, aniac,s my and meny other drives 143 scannies and i know a early 141 still in work whit 60 tn. as you can do whit old yankees you can do whit others to,and scannies is easy to keep in roadwork for long,trust my a know.cheers benkku,and only a wery handful lices cat,s overhere c15 and 18 was no god in sisu,s

Trev_H:

[zb]
anorak:

Trev_H:
I remember working on one of Astrans 140’s. It had limped home from the middle east on 7 cylinders, it think it had a water hose fail,overheated and no.8 piston had picked up (furthest from the water pump), partially seizing.
Slacking each injector pipe in turn the driver discovered which cyl. took the knock away, he then had dropped the sump taken off the single cyl head and removed the offending piston. The big end oilways were taped with plastic to maintain oil pressure,the head re-fitted and no 8 injector was firing into a gallon can which had a pipe returning the diesel back to the tank, I was amazed by the guy’s resourcefulness and puzzled when he came into the garage and declared he needed a new piston fitting ! I asked why he thought he needed a new piston when he told me the tale and got the knackered one out of the cab !
Months later he came in with a rigid inside a tilt trailer, rolled in on its brake drums with a failed gearbox !
I was a big fan of the Scania V8’s and found them very simple to work on.

Temperature gauge u/s, was it? Very resourceful bloke…

If you have ever had a bottom hose fail you will lose the water and overheat the engine quickly, the temp gauge can only react quickly with water in the system, hence later vehicles were fitted with a low water level warning.

I once blew a water hose of my Scania V8 racetruck at Alastaro Circuit, I couldn’t stop because Volvo was aproaching me behind so I drove 3 laps without water with about 1000 horsepower and 3200 rpm. After race I let the engine cool down and filled with water and started the next race. No damage at all, it was based on 141 block. So V8’s being sensitive to coolant overheating is BS if you ask me, it’s high EGT what kills them.

.

Cf: Why are you quoting yourself?

[zb]
anorak:
Cf: Why are you quoting yourself?

he want,s a more suitable answer to the qestion :question: :smiley: :smiley: :smiley: :smiley: .cheers benkku

bma.finland:

[zb]
anorak:
Cf: Why are you quoting yourself?

he want,s a more suitable answer to the qestion :question: :smiley: :smiley: :smiley: :smiley: .cheers benkku

:open_mouth: :blush: Typing without due care and attention. :laughing:

I’d say any premium European tractor will last as long as an American one still plenty of 3 series scanias in western Europe and they are at least 16 years old now plenty of erf’s and fodens soiled ring on head south in to Europe where the tin worm isn’t such a problem and we can see fiats 1 series scanias f88 volvos head to Malta and we can still see those piles of British junk still toiling away.
Just different business practices most European operators have gone down the road of keeping the fleet age down helped by finance and lease deals and strong export values of certain models.
After spending the last couple of weeks in Canada I’d say the north American trucks are well suited to there enviroment but a little less refined than European offerings. But at the same time The north American market trucks although looking good ain’t wholly suited to modern European operating conditions.
I don’t think one is better than the other it’s just horses for courses.
Now back to v8 scanias others have produced great high power trucks the f16 fh16 the big v8 mercs the v10 man even the big ■■■■■■■ powered fodens and original daf super space. The v8 scania just has a bit more soul. Only one close to it for soul I’d say is a v8 turbostar but the scania didn’t fall apart as quick. It’s like buying an Alfa Romeo you know it will fall apart and let you down at the most inconvenient time but you forgive it because when it works properly it’s great. A v8 scania is like a m3 BMW it has the ability to make you smile but you know it’s not going refuse to start when your wife is in labour in the passenger seat.

kr79:
A v8 scania is like a m3 BMW it has the ability to make you smile but you know it’s not going refuse to start when your wife is in labour in the passenger seat.

That’s the same reasoning that the North American market has often used for buying their domestic products over European or Scandinavian.I could never understand how a company that got where it was by building products on that basis then wasted loads a money on trying to keep SAAB going. :open_mouth: :smiling_imp: :laughing:

Saviem:
Now I know that there are several excellent “model specific” Scania threads on this super site, but as a “non Scania man”, (although Ive handled, driven, and run a fair few),I can not for the life of me understand the absolute adoration of Scania V8s, from the 140, up to todays offerings. Please, lets have all your experiences, good, or not so good, to drive, run, repair, and sell. There must be some really interesting experiences to share! Over to you Gentlemen.

After the Gardner thread , here is another thread destined for ruination , once again caused by more inane drivel which is not related to the initial posting , by meaningless waffle about what everyone should have done . Facts & figures about screamnig Detrioits , when it is supposed to be specific to Scania V8s .
Obviously comparison will be made to other V8s etc , but not in the way certain parties can drag a thread as much off course & then get everyone else to lose interest in the whole thing .

kr79:
Now back to v8 scanias others have produced great high power trucks the f16 fh16 the big v8 mercs the v10 man even the big ■■■■■■■ powered fodens and original daf super space. The v8 scania just has a bit more soul. Only one close to it for soul I’d say is a v8 turbostar but the scania didn’t fall apart as quick. It’s like buying an Alfa Romeo you know it will fall apart and let you down at the most inconvenient time but you forgive it because when it works properly it’s great. A v8 scania is like a m3 BMW it has the ability to make you smile but you know it’s not going refuse to start when your wife is in labour in the passenger seat.

See this cf ^^^^? This is a pertinent answer to the question posed in the original post. IE, it is relevant to the thread, encouraging other people to contribute. Please desist from these silly US comparisons.

Casual Observer- you beat me to it, but I might as well post anyway. Fuel to the fire, so to speak.

kr79 et al- was the Fiat’s falling-apart restricted to the cab, or did the engine/chassis/suspension etc. contribute to its poor reputation?

Evening all, this thread is nicely motoring along I see!!

Just dieseled up my John Deere, what a machine with that engine, but in its Detroit Diesel 60 form is it as “thirsty” as my five girls■■? Never ever could complain about the power,(or the exhaust note), but now that “claret” is the price of Lager Beer,…no I still would not swop them!!

[ZB]s point about the “other” V8s, I think that bma, and nmm, have answered , the overall package in the Scania product, driver enviroment in particular, and ease of repair on the V8, outshone the others. But as a “rorty torty, get up and go” engine the Fiat/Unic design beats everything else hands down!!! Pity about the “cycle parts”.

I remember driving a Fiat V8 owned by a Turin based owner driver, who had just ordered a 356 Renault, (Berliet), in Le Centaur specification. Where the Berliet design was “soft” in its application of power, and you could easily mistake just how fast you were going, and what progress you were making, that Fiat…with 13speeds that slipped through with hardly a thought, like riding a screaming Japanese two stroke motorcycle!! And never even regarded the (even by Italy`s standards), illegal payload, (with a similar fuel consumption to the Japanese two stroke). But she sold, (thank goodness), to a new Sicilian home, where surely the sunshine would arrest the inevitable voracious appetite of the “tin worm”.

Now the MAN V8s, that we had in the Saviems. Good on fuel, made a nice noise, and in fairness were a powerful piece of (well designed ) engineering, back in the early 70s . I remember at one “heavy” post lunch product meeeting at Quai Galleni, with true Black Country lack of tact, in my best “Norman accented” French, describing the performance as “lardy arsed”, and being somewhat bemused at the blank facial expressions around me! Some two years later, a similar product meeting, but in the sunny offices at the former Berliet plant at Venissieux, the speaker, a senior product engineer, with a totally straight face, refered to the “old” Saviem MAN V8, as “lardy arsed”, and everybody applauded!!! My sole contribution to French verbal culture!!

Mark, (nmm) is right, contrary to popular myth, US operators were “mean” on power for many years. I remember Georgia “Doubles” pulled by 210hp ■■■■■■■■ Texas operators with KW ,short BBCs, on vans at 200/250hp in the late 70s, and even Montana “Bull Haulers”, rolling behind 250hp, (but with lots of gears), those “Possum Bellied” trailers carried some, (fragrant) weight!!

When I recall my own Scanias, on both Contract Hire, and Short Term rental, a mix of R143, (only ever one)!! R112s, P113s, and R113 360s, P92s and 93s, in all forms, without going back into the old records, the one statistic that always sticks in my mind , is that on Daily Rental, the Scanias, (and the short term motors were only ever P cabs), ran at a truly astonishing 98% utilisation.

So bma is right, (if I paraphrase), if its a Scania its great, if its a V8 ITS A BONUS!!!

Iwill away to my supper, (cold Salmon Trout curry, Bismati Rice, Damson Tartine, and a little Bollinger, (to drown my sorrows), at my action in part exchanging my “unloved”, T143 for a new John Deere on Tracks…my loss, a Belgian Tractor Dealers gain, bon nuit mes braves, Cheerio for now.

Casual Observer:

Saviem:
Now I know that there are several excellent “model specific” Scania threads on this super site, but as a “non Scania man”, (although Ive handled, driven, and run a fair few),I can not for the life of me understand the absolute adoration of Scania V8s, from the 140, up to todays offerings. Please, lets have all your experiences, good, or not so good, to drive, run, repair, and sell. There must be some really interesting experiences to share! Over to you Gentlemen.

After the Gardner thread , here is another thread destined for ruination , once again caused by more inane drivel which is not related to the initial posting , by meaningless waffle about what everyone should have done . Facts & figures about screamnig Detrioits , when it is supposed to be specific to Scania V8s .
Obviously comparison will be made to other V8s etc , but not in the way certain parties can drag a thread as much off course & then get everyone else to lose interest in the whole thing .

It was ZB who asked the questions related to the comparisons with other types as to what was it that made the Scania so different.There didn’t seem to be anything in Saviem’s post that kept the subject all about Scania without those comparisons concerning it’s competitors.So why didn’t you raise the issue at that point when he asked the question instead of now :question: .

Carryfast:

kr79:
A v8 scania is like a m3 BMW it has the ability to make you smile but you know it’s not going refuse to start when your wife is in labour in the passenger seat.

That’s the same reasoning that the North American market has often used for buying their domestic products over European or Scandinavian.I could never understand how a company that got where it was by building products on that basis then wasted loads a money on trying to keep SAAB going. :open_mouth: :smiling_imp: :laughing:

Scania ditched Saab about 20 years ago gm soilderd o. With it until this year. As I said in my pervious post it’s horses for courses and that’s why volvos offerings on both sides of the Atlantic are very different beasts although I’d say there American offerings have benefitted from European input. Although fly sheet might not agree 100% although what does he know he can’t even drink rum and coke anymore. :smiley:

[zb]
anorak:

kr79:
Now back to v8 scanias others have produced great high power trucks the f16 fh16 the big v8 mercs the v10 man even the big ■■■■■■■ powered fodens and original daf super space. The v8 scania just has a bit more soul. Only one close to it for soul I’d say is a v8 turbostar but the scania didn’t fall apart as quick. It’s like buying an Alfa Romeo you know it will fall apart and let you down at the most inconvenient time but you forgive it because when it works properly it’s great. A v8 scania is like a m3 BMW it has the ability to make you smile but you know it’s not going refuse to start when your wife is in labour in the passenger seat.

See this cf ^^^^? This is a pertinent answer to the question posed in the original post. IE, it is relevant to the thread, encouraging other people to contribute. Please desist from these silly US comparisons.

Casual Observer- you beat me to it, but I might as well post anyway. Fuel to the fire, so to speak.

kr79 et al- was the Fiat’s falling-apart restricted to the cab, or did the engine/chassis/suspension etc. contribute to its poor reputation?

Not an expert on them myself but think it was cab and electrics. Driveline was pretty bullet proof. I’m sure if Newmercman sees this he will tell you he has a soft spot for iveco v8s

[zb]
anorak:

kr79:
Now back to v8 scanias others have produced great high power trucks the f16 fh16 the big v8 mercs the v10 man even the big ■■■■■■■ powered fodens and original daf super space. The v8 scania just has a bit more soul. Only one close to it for soul I’d say is a v8 turbostar but the scania didn’t fall apart as quick. It’s like buying an Alfa Romeo you know it will fall apart and let you down at the most inconvenient time but you forgive it because when it works properly it’s great. A v8 scania is like a m3 BMW it has the ability to make you smile but you know it’s not going refuse to start when your wife is in labour in the passenger seat.

See this cf ^^^^? This is a pertinent answer to the question posed in the original post. IE, it is relevant to the thread, encouraging other people to contribute. Please desist from these silly US comparisons.

Casual Observer- you beat me to it, but I might as well post anyway. Fuel to the fire, so to speak.

kr79 et al- was the Fiat’s falling-apart restricted to the cab, or did the engine/chassis/suspension etc. contribute to its poor reputation?

The American comparison is relevant in the case of Scania getting a lead in the market which might not have been the same with a more US based British truck manufacturing industry in competition with it.But that would have required a more open minded British customer base which obviously never existed at the time or now.