raymundo:
Read an article somewhere very recently by someone who know’s what they are talking about, not an internet article who spouts bollux and don’t know what they’re on about half the time and that the reason for wanting more immigration was their dwindling population and less workers to service the welfare costs in the future etc etc, the figures were there and it made sense to me, but I now sit back and await why it was all pro immigration socialist propaganda/waffle and b/s at the instigation of our masters and their puppets.
Let me guess you really believe that Germany can’t maintain enough of its population to maintain itself as a nation and bringing in a load of Arab immigrants to take over the country will fix that non existent problem. 
Will someone remind me that I promised to shoot myself if anyone came on and claimed to know the real economic and population trends of another country, and every other bloody fact or assumption not made by a Google troll.
I thought by reading and listening one learned things but obviously that has always been a load of bollux, for actual facts just ask the learned one on here! Font of all knowledge, my arse !!
raymundo:
Will someone remind me that I promised to shoot myself if anyone came on and claimed to know the real economic and population trends of another country, and every other bloody fact or assumption not made by a Google troll.
I thought by reading and listening one learned things but obviously that has always been a load of bollux, for actual facts just ask the learned one on here! Font of all knowledge, my arse !!
Like the inconvenient question how does a country with supposedly not enough workers to maintain its economy have an unemployment figure of around 2 million,you mean.
The ‘facts’ in your case will only be acceptable if they fit your bs pro immigration agenda.
Carryfast:
BillyHunt:
Just a bit of perspective on which countries are taking refugees from Syria. You know, because some people on here seem to think the other Middle East countries aren’t doing anything.
businessinsider.com/the-coun … ees-2014-9
Where is Saudi and Kuwait on your list.No surprise that Israel won’t be stupid enough to invite them in bearing in mind what happened the last two times that Syria decided to ‘take refuge’ in Israel using military force and luckily failing both times.
I don’t know, it’s not my list, I don’t work for businessinsider.com, I drive a truck.
Carryfast:
BillyHunt:
Carryfast:
SuperMultiBlue:
Accept some but on the condition of no state benefits/social housing.
You’re fit enough to trek from Syria you’re fit enough to packshelves/fruit pick.
Cheap labour is actually why the Cons want them here. As for Merkel who knows probably jut living up to her previous East German Socialist roots of destroy the west by helping the Arab cause to do it.
Of course, I never thought of that, you do it by taking close to 1 million into your own country, quite clever really.
You don’t have to analyse this, I’m being facetious.
If you’re referring to my comments regarding Merkel there is no such thing as the nation state in the Socialist doctrine.IE her only ‘country’ is her ideology not lines drawn on a map.An ideology which history shows sees an advantage in strong alliances with the Arab nation as part of the plan to infiltrate and destroy the Western democracies as we ( knew ) them.Partly based on the flawed idea that Capitalism is a Jewish conspiracy.You seem to forget that I was also one of her zb lot.
How can I forget something I never knew? Last time I checked you were English with a healthy dose of Irish, what are you saying you are/were now? East German, socialist, capitalist, Jewish, Arab. Tbh it’s hard to keep up with all your twists & turns.
raymundo:
Will someone remind me that I promised to shoot myself if anyone came on and claimed to know the real economic and population trends of another country, and every other bloody fact or assumption not made by a Google troll.
I thought by reading and listening one learned things but obviously that has always been a load of bollux, for actual facts just ask the learned one on here! Font of all knowledge, my arse !!
Didn’t you know Google makes every armchair warrior an expert on everything, there are plenty on here, this one just believes he is an expert. Knows the price of everything & the value of nothing.
BillyHunt:
You seem to forget that I was also one of her zb lot.
How can I forget something I never knew? Last time I checked you were English with a healthy dose of Irish, what are you saying you are/were now? East German, socialist, capitalist, Jewish, Arab. Tbh it’s hard to keep up with all your twists & turns.
[/quote]
I thought I’d made it clear that I ‘was’ a Socialist.As such as I said ‘at that time’ as an essential part of that I didn’t recognise the idea of the nation state anyway.I’m guessing you understand the words and meaning of this.
youtube.com/watch?v=PBm9NQ9kxRE
youtube.com/watch?v=MzOY43KTxJU
BillyHunt:
Carryfast:
BillyHunt:
Just a bit of perspective on which countries are taking refugees from Syria. You know, because some people on here seem to think the other Middle East countries aren’t doing anything.
businessinsider.com/the-coun … ees-2014-9
Where is Saudi and Kuwait on your list.No surprise that Israel won’t be stupid enough to invite them in bearing in mind what happened the last two times that Syria decided to ‘take refuge’ in Israel using military force and luckily failing both times.
I don’t know, it’s not my list, I don’t work for businessinsider.com, I drive a truck.
That figures.You refer to something that you ‘thought’ showed that the Middle East was sorting out its own problems.But then you don’t actually know if it does when asked the inconvenient question as to why is Saudi and Kuwait missing and Israel obviously isn’t interested for obvious reasons.
I’ve been outside tonight watching the northern lights and very spectacular they were too on the coast of the Moray Firth, much better than reading the sad ■■■■■■ repetitive drivel on here. Get a life apart from havin yer eyes glued to the Pc CF.
If we did not interfere in countries like Syria and Iraq there would be no Refugee crisis.
Did ‘we’ interfere in Syria, Or was that a civil war between Assad and some rebels to start with ?
I ask because I do not know to be 100% sure but hang around as someone will be along soon to put us ALL right, cue … ■■?
Guiy de Montfort:
If we did not interfere in countries like Syria and Iraq there would be no Refugee crisis.
It seems a bit strange as to how ‘the west’ sees any advantage in replacing Assad with more extreme Jihadist factions.Let alone opening Europe up to possible hostile Arab infiltration.Although to be fair we only attacked Iraq after it went for Kuwait.When probably on balance it would have been better if we’d have left Kuwait and Saudi to their fate.
While prior to that we would have seen a second holocaust in Israel if the US hadn’t decided to get involved in a proxy war with Russia in the Middle East to defend it against Russian backed Arab aggression.
Meanwhile this could all get ‘interesting’ assuming that neither Russia or the US is prepared to back down over Syria.
news.yahoo.com/syrian-official-s … 36285.html
Carryfast:
BillyHunt:
Carryfast:
BillyHunt:
Just a bit of perspective on which countries are taking refugees from Syria. You know, because some people on here seem to think the other Middle East countries aren’t doing anything.
businessinsider.com/the-coun … ees-2014-9
Where is Saudi and Kuwait on your list.No surprise that Israel won’t be stupid enough to invite them in bearing in mind what happened the last two times that Syria decided to ‘take refuge’ in Israel using military force and luckily failing both times.
I don’t know, it’s not my list, I don’t work for businessinsider.com, I drive a truck.
That figures.You refer to something that you ‘thought’ showed that the Middle East was sorting out its own problems.But then you don’t actually know if it does when asked the inconvenient question as to why is Saudi and Kuwait missing and Israel obviously isn’t interested for obvious reasons.
You’re wrong, again. I knew it didn’t show Saudi & Kuwait, I just don’t know why it didn’t. I could get you another article with how many all the Middle East countries, and why some aren’t, but what’s the point, you wouldn’t believe it anyway & you have no interest in knowing.
BillyHunt:
Carryfast:
That figures.You refer to something that you ‘thought’ showed that the Middle East was sorting out its own problems.But then you don’t actually know if it does when asked the inconvenient question as to why is Saudi and Kuwait missing and Israel obviously isn’t interested for obvious reasons.
You’re wrong, again. I knew it didn’t show Saudi & Kuwait, I just don’t know why it didn’t. I could get you another article with how many all the Middle East countries, and why some aren’t, but what’s the point, you wouldn’t believe it anyway & you have no interest in knowing.
You knew it didn’t show Saudi and Kuwait.But that obviously and predictably didn’t stop you using it.In a failed pathetic attempt to suggest that the ‘Middle East’ has run out of capacity to deal with its own problems meaning that we need to open our borders up to an Arab invasion.In addition to all the other parasites trying to get in with them.
Carryfast:
BillyHunt:
Carryfast:
That figures.You refer to something that you ‘thought’ showed that the Middle East was sorting out its own problems.But then you don’t actually know if it does when asked the inconvenient question as to why is Saudi and Kuwait missing and Israel obviously isn’t interested for obvious reasons.
You’re wrong, again. I knew it didn’t show Saudi & Kuwait, I just don’t know why it didn’t. I could get you another article with how many all the Middle East countries, and why some aren’t, but what’s the point, you wouldn’t believe it anyway & you have no interest in knowing.
You knew it didn’t show Saudi and Kuwait.But that obviously and predictably didn’t stop you using it.In a failed pathetic attempt to suggest that the ‘Middle East’ has run out of capacity to deal with its own problems meaning that we need to open our borders up to an Arab invasion.In addition to all the other parasites trying to get in with them.
Wrong again, I know you’re used to it. It was merely a report showing that, despite what some on here, you included, that we aren’t taking in anywhere near as many as some others. I don’t know if the Middle East countries have run out of capacity, I’ve no idea how big they are, I’m sure you will look it up though. Arab invasion! No paranoia there is there, tell the truth for a change, you’re only bothered because you know the majority will be gathering around you’re leafy suburbs, nimbyism at its best. You wouldn’t be saying a word if they were all being sent to Scotland would you. Haw haw, ■■■■ it up buttercup.
BillyHunt:
Carryfast:
You knew it didn’t show Saudi and Kuwait.But that obviously and predictably didn’t stop you using it.In a failed pathetic attempt to suggest that the ‘Middle East’ has run out of capacity to deal with its own problems meaning that we need to open our borders up to an Arab invasion.In addition to all the other parasites trying to get in with them.
Wrong again, I know you’re used to it. It was merely a report showing that, despite what some on here, you included, that we aren’t taking in anywhere near as many as some others. I don’t know if the Middle East countries have run out of capacity, I’ve no idea how big they are, I’m sure you will look it up though. Arab invasion! No paranoia there is there, tell the truth for a change, you’re only bothered because you know the majority will be gathering around you’re leafy suburbs, nimbyism at its best. You wouldn’t be saying a word if they were all being sent to Scotland would you. Haw haw, ■■■■ it up buttercup.
The fact is it is a deliberate Socialist plot to relocate a massive proportion of the Arab population into Northern Europe.The fact that the population in question ‘could’ be kept in its right place within other Arab states with more resources but isn’t and the fact that those like you see it as a win win situation on the basis of North v South class war says it all.Although at least your comments show who really makes up much of the Con pro immigration faction.
In which case it seems clear who the real NIMBY’s and hypocrites are.Which I’m sure won’t be missed at least among the South East Con vote and all the other areas on your planned immigration hot spot hit list when the time comes to kick Cameron out in the EU referendum.
Which probably explains why Cameron and Boris are already deciding how many more they can force into London with the rest of its immigrant population.So rest assured those ‘leafy suburbs’ are probably still almost as safe as Scotland’s hypocritical Socialist when it suits it heartlands.That is depending on your definition of NIMBY in an environment where we’ve got a united home grown and invading immigrant Jihadist cause on the loose.
Just so you know, the EU referendum will decide if we stay in the European Union or not, not if Cameron stays in office, that was the general election. I thought even the dumbest of people knew that, apparently not.
BillyHunt:
Just so you know, the EU referendum will decide if we stay in the European Union or not, not if Cameron stays in office, that was the general election. I thought even the dumbest of people knew that, apparently not.
Bearing in mind that the Norf East isn’t exactly going to give you much of an insight into Con Party internal politics trust me if/when Cameron loses that referendum vote.Or for that matter puts a load of ‘asylum seekers’ where they aren’t wanted/welcome in Con Party vote heartlands,or the country ends up with a Jihadist outrage or two in the meantime because of his grovelling to Merkel,he’s toast. 
The strange thing is as a supposed Con supporter/voter I’d have expected you to know that rather than go all class war lets hit the South East on the issue. 
With pro EU Labour and SNP ‘friends’ like this he doesn’t enemies like his own rebels.While showing the hypocrisy of Labour MP’s like Danczuc.Whose Party wants to let them all in and who then has the nerve to blame Conservative Party voters.For holding Cameron to account,for his grovelling pro immigration stance,by saying no thanks.On the ( correct ) basis of let those who want them take them and Cameron’s pro immigration bs obviously isn’t backed by his constituency electoral mandate.
express.co.uk/news/politics/ … ur-Commons
express.co.uk/news/uk/603227 … 1437680309
Carryfast:
BillyHunt:
Just so you know, the EU referendum will decide if we stay in the European Union or not, not if Cameron stays in office, that was the general election. I thought even the dumbest of people knew that, apparently not.
Bearing in mind that the Norf East isn’t exactly going to give you much of an insight into Con Party internal politics trust me if/when Cameron loses that referendum vote.Or for that matter puts a load of ‘asylum seekers’ where they aren’t wanted/welcome in Con Party vote heartlands,or the country ends up with a Jihadist outrage or two in the meantime because of his grovelling to Merkel,he’s toast.
The strange thing is as a supposed Con supporter/voter I’d have expected you to know that rather than go all class war lets hit the South East on the issue.
With pro EU Labour and SNP ‘friends’ like this he doesn’t enemies like his own rebels.While showing the hypocrisy of Labour MP’s like Danczuc.Whose Party wants to let them all in and who then has the nerve to blame Conservative Party voters.For holding Cameron to account,for his grovelling pro immigration stance,by saying no thanks.On the ( correct ) basis of let those who want them take them and Cameron’s pro immigration bs obviously isn’t backed by his constituency electoral mandate.
express.co.uk/news/politics/ … ur-Commons
express.co.uk/news/uk/603227 … 1437680309
And we are back to a subject done to death on here so all I will say is, given your often stated hatred of the Tories in general, and Cameron in particular, coupled with your obvious, and well proven, inability to forecast the outcome of any political contest, I think I will ignore your ideas on what will happen.
Although I don’t read them, I do find it amusing that, on one hand you continue to tell all how much you disbelieve the British media, while on the other you continue to put up links from them to try & prove your point.