ROG:
Whos other decision is it to be ? - no-ones as far as I can see… every rule that I have seen in my career says the ultimate decision to drive is that of the driver.
To the best of my knowledge the law doesn’t specify who’s decision this would be, but that doesn’t necessarily give the driver sole decision rights nor does it mean that a driver can simply say “I don’t take 9 hour rests” without jeopardising his/her job.
Perhaps a quote from the rules you’ve seen that state it’s a drivers decision and no-one else’s may be appropriate
DAFMAD:
I would have thought with a name like yours you would know the rules, so where does it say that the employer has the decision ? the driver cannot decide for himself ? I think you’ll find the employer has to abide by the drivers hours rules. They say the driver may do this that and the other. Where does the rules say your employer can overrule the drivers decision on any reductions and or extensions etc ? They do not say, the employer may make these decisions for the driver.
The regulations don’t give an employer the sole decision on this but nor do the regulations give the driver the ultimate decision.
Actually the regulations don’t say “the driver may do this that and the other”, the drivers rules booklet produced by Vosa makes it very clear that it’s for guidance only and should not be regarded as an authoritative statement of law.
The drivers hours booklet produced by Vosa is a reflection of how Vosa will enforce the regulations, but to the best of my knowledge Vosa have no authority when it comes to employment law, and this is the regulations that would be relevant if a company decided to require a 9 hour daily rest.
Disclaimer
This publication gives general guidance only and should not be regarded as a complete
or authoritative statement of the law. The guidance will be updated to reflect any
developments in new legislation or case law.
If you wish to check the legal position, you should refer to the main legislation listed
in Annex 1 and, if necessary, seek your own legal advice. The guidance offered in this
publication reflects VOSA’s current enforcement policy. It does not reflect interpretation
of the law in other countries.
The very first piece of relevant legislation in Annex 1 is “EC Regulation 561/2006 on drivers’ hours and tachographs”.
The daily rest requirements in EC 561/2006 state:
Article 8
-
A driver shall take daily and weekly rest periods.
-
Within each period of 24 hours after the end of the
previous daily rest period or weekly rest period a driver shall
have taken a new daily rest period.
If the portion of the daily rest period which falls within that
24 hour period is at least nine hours but less than 11 hours,
then the daily rest period in question shall be regarded as a
reduced daily rest period.
-
A daily rest period may be extended to make a regular
weekly rest period or a reduced weekly rest period.
-
A driver may have at most three reduced daily rest
periods between any two weekly rest periods.
No reference to who’s decision it is on 9 hour daily rests.
ROG:
I can see where ‘tachograph’ is coming from - he is quoting the LAW and is pointing out what is, or is not said, within that LAW.
We, on the other hand, are quoting what is said in regard to good driving practices which is based on SAFETY.
SAFETY overides the LAW every time which is why the ethos of advanced driving is 1 SAFE, 2 LEGAL, 3 CONVENIENT (as poss) etc etc Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
I agree that to some extent we’re talking about different aspects of the same regulation.
As far as I can see the vast majority of us at TruckNet are drivers or wannabe drives, so I’m sure we would all like it to be solely the drivers decision on weather or not he/she will have reduced daily rests, however we have to deal with the law as it is and not as we would like it to be.
You say safety over-rides law every time, well to a point I would agree, but the point is that as has already been said if a driver simply says “I don’t do 9 hour daily rests” he/she could be putting their job at risk, I don’t accept that it’s as black and white as is sometime suggested.
In fact I doubt that there is a definitive answer to this question, I imagine that how an industrial tribunal would see things would depend to a large extent on the circumstances, asking a driver to have a reduced daily rest at base when that driver lives some distance from work is different to asking a driver to have a reduced daily rest when the driver is on a night out and the company know that it’s the drivers regular practice to sleep in a lay-by and have food in the cab.