Political discussions...

Ironically he doesn’t care if those far right pensioners, fighting off his Stasi on their doorsteps with their walking sticks, hate him.
While the champagne Socialist train driving elite just see more immigration as more customers to carry.It doesn’t matter if the money to pay the fare is nicked off said pensioners along with their houses and food and heating.
Is our resident Frito or Fronicker a retired train driver I wonder.

Rob Churchill would obviously know all about a paramilitary police force in the form of the Black and Tan in his case.
Gestapo, NKVD, Stasi all the same thing and all known for their knock on the door tactics.Except that the Black and Tan generally skipped the arrest bit they just shot their victims on the door step where they stood.
At the end of the day it’s all the politics of the anti nation state collective.
Which is why the Conservatives can find common ground with Socialism in all its forms and the Gestapo certainly was a product of German Socialism.Just like the Stasi was later.
Make no mistake Starmer’s regime is just a ConLab coalition in all but name using a rigged election result to provide the Tories with plausible deniability.

Highest earning MP?
A King’s Council Lawyer? Medical Doctor in Harley St? Corporate board member?

At least Clacton is benefitting though as it gets more exposure “on the world stage” :grinning:

And a link to add a video

:joy::joy::joy: there’s nothing more telling about a person’s nature thanwhen they display the politics of envy :joy: personally I don’t give a rats ass about what a person earns, it’s their business to negotiate a good deal for themselves. It’s not hurting me.

Do I care if Farage earns a million quid as TV presenter?
No, I don’t.

Do I care if any MP earns more for doing the bidding of a company or individual than they do as there job as an MP?
Yes, I do.

I have said before, and I will repeat it,
MPs should all be paid more for what is, or should be, a serious full time job.
None should have any work outside. (except if it is unpaid, or taxed at 100%)

Of course you do! Your liberal ■■■■■■■ are bunched up into your clenched buttocks at the mere thought of someone who your politics forces you to despise is doing quite well out of something. Once again I’ll reiterate ; the politics of envy.

I can’t get upset in the slightest about whatever a politician of whatever hue make “on the side”. Let’s face it; they aren’t doing 15 hours a day of manual labour, so why shouldn’t they fill their time ensuring a comfortable life for themselves? We’re not in a communist state you do realise?

It seems that auto censor doesn’t like the alternative word for ladies undergarments starting with a K and ending with ickers

Tell @robroy and @carryfast then!

1 Like

Well RR is from the frozen northern wastelands and CF is from the planet Zog, so I’d expect nothing less tbh.

Of course you care.
Otherwise why randomly bring it up.
It seems that any high profile politician (other than a Labour one) who is slightly ‘off the wall’ and not glaringly ‘beige’…ie a bit like yourself , is a target for your beratement.
Johnson, Trump,.Farage to name 3.

I don’t care much what others earn for their work, so long as everyone pays their tax dues.

Many have moaned about Labour MPs having “Trade Union paymasters” etc. I think that Unions sponsoring MPs is also wrong.

MPs should be well paid to be MPs and have no outside income.

If they are only working part time, then they probably aren’t doing a very good job.

We agree on that at least. I honestly do care one iota about what someone makes on the side, in as much as I don’t care about a truck driver earning for example 30 quid for dropping a pallet off at a place he’s passing anyway. Not my business.

Unions should not give money to MPs.
Neither should companies nor individuals.

Starmer and Rayner should not have Union money.
Sunak and Farage should not have outside sources either.

unless its rayner or starmer of course then its either shrugged off or denied

so where do the parties get their funding from then for campaigning etc

Instead of troubling yourself and clutching your pearls over how much someone you dislike is earning, boo hoo…Good luck to him I say, could not give a toss.

Why not concern yourself instead over something that involves you ditectly, like the complete Horlicks your mate Starmer is making so far in such a short time.
I’ve already addressed a direct question to you about it which you have conveniently ignored.
Perhaps you could care to answer it seeing as it was you and people like you who palmed us all off with him and his shower of sh.

Or is it really sooo hard…(if not impossible) for Franglais to defy and go against the official narrative of the Labour Party,.especially when you were oh so vocal about all the Tory balls ups.

Maybe you fear getting a visit from the Starmer ‘Social media Thought Police’ and a fast track into the nick…is that it?
:joy:

I dislike several people. I don’t give a toss about where most of them earn their money.
I do care about where MPs, and others who are active politically, and who DO directly affect my life earn cash.

Which question was that?
And, have I “palmed you off” with something? Are you ignoring a General Election vote?
Because it didn’t go the way you wanted, should you still have the right to complain?
Or should everyone just shut up about it? Wasn’t that your continual cry about Brexit?


And no other outside funding.

From a central fund. From taxes.

You get what you pay for.
He who pays the piper calls the tune

If we want decent Gov it isn’t financially free.
I don’t want funds from Unions, companies or individuals to enter the system.

When voting, there should be a box for the Party you want to get in, and a box for the Party you want funds to go to.

All parties should get a small fund, but those with more boxes ticked get more funds.

All MPs should get better pay. The good ones do work long hours, although many don’t bother.
If any want/need to keep their feet on the ground in their previous professions, and I applaud those who work as Doctors etc, then they should, but they should not do so for financial reward. Give them expenses, but then take off any earnings.

@Franglais.

So…You can not even bring yourself to admit that Labour are making a complete arse of the job, when it is blindingly obvious that they are…and especially after all that horse sh pre election cack you were spouting, about ‘‘How they were gonna be a better option.’’
How did that litle gem work out so far?.

Break the habit of a lifetime, …and open your eyes, think for YOURSELF instead of toeing the official line on things, and wanting to be right all the time…even when you are wrong …you are a 'kin joke mate…:roll_eyes:

And wtf has Brexit to do with it?:joy:
Let it go man !..
That was years ago,… history, whilst this Labour based cluster ■■■■ is current.

And as for you making a comparison with me and the election,.and you and Brexit.
I am merely commenting relavantly on a current state of affairs, where as everybody on here knows, you were constantly crying your ■■■■■■ eyes out to the point of making a fool of yourself on a done deal…a finale. :roll_eyes:
Brexit is here to stay, where as 2tK and his gang aint, if they keep performing like this all the way to the next election.
Or are you also gonna argue that point? :roll_eyes:

The kindergartens still haven’t sorted who has the bigger pecker
Or who’s the biggest racist

To be fair, it’s all on topic…

But if it bugs you that much mate, you know what to do … eh?
It aint difficult.

Wait for it…

Scroll through, …and just don’t even read it.

You’re welcome.:sunglasses:

Definitely won’t be scrolling through it
Miss all the stupidity in the kindergarten, it’s a laugh, nothing creditable except making a laugh of yourselfs and being racist
How long have you being holding this in, it’s like someone coming out, its a bit late mate the horse has bolted
Or it could be someone has just discovered social media