I think they should immediately reinstate Boris! Bear with me here, when Boris was in office the weather was terrific, nobody went to work and more importantly bar staff brought your drinks to your table. Oh how good we had it then.
another own goal scored by rayner the other day on prime ministers questions trying to dodge questions about her own misdeeds attacked the conservatives over their renters reform bill. Was told at least 3 times in the 10 minuets i watched that they would vote on it that afternoon. Not being content with that she then went and voted against 2 of the bits of legislation put in to defend tenants.
Rayner was asking about Section 21 “no fault evictions”. An issue from the 2019 Tory manifesto, and not included in the current bill.
PMQs is for the PM (or deputy) to answer questions.
There are other channels for Rayner to be questioned about her behaviour.
it is in there sorry its been in there from the beginning and still is
It may be sold as an end to no-fault evictions, but it isn’t.
so its still going ahead then
Well, if you think that promising a car and delivering a rusty pushbike is a good deal…then enjoy!
is it going to be banned yes no rusty pushbike here
however do you agree that her aim was to get it through yet she voted against it. bit of a double standard there for her.
she also voted against stopping short term leases yet shouts there needs to be more long term secure housing.
Maybe in the future it will be banned, but it is not in the current bill. It is on hold awaiting court reforms.
"Caroline Lucas, Green MP for Brighton, said the move demonstrated “blatant concessions to the significant numbers of Conservative MPs sitting behind him who are landlords who have been gifted what amounts to an indefinite delay to ban no-fault evictions”.
Here is a rusty old bike until your new car is delivered.
if you want to twist it that way then at least they are being given a rusty bike rayner wanted to take that away
not to mention of course the housing projects labour want with several mp’s sat behind starmer with building companies and material supply companies
Shortage of housing has nothing to do with Labour, Starmer or any of his mates, it’s been a recurring complaint from many people for many years
Aren’t you twisting a promise of jam tomorrow, to sound like they’ve already delivered?
Are you saying the UK does not need houses built?
We have too many, and they are all too cheap?
The Tories promise more houses but have underdelivered.
Who are they?
Do no Tory MPs have such interests?
Many MPs of different parties (rightly or wrongly) have interests outside of Parliament, and there are steps to try to stop them being exploited.
so these steps will stop labour building houses as it directly affects their mp’s but dont according to you stop a few conservative back benchers vetoing section 21 pull the other one
Tanmanjeet Singh DHESI
for one i cant find any conservative cabinet members with a building company
sort out the immigration/migration issue something labour doesnt want to do stop rich high earners living in council houses again something labour doesnt want to do use the nearly 700,000 empty properties guess what labour doesnt want to do that either
they are going to deliver it no one is claiming they already have. should it of been done slightly quicker maybe but you have labour and a democracy to blame for that voting against it
Shadow Minister for exports who’s father has a building company.
Torys?
68 are currently landlords.
Look up Jenrick and the unlawful planning approval for Tory donor Desmond.
and another 20 labour are landlords so what. how many of the 68 are cabinet members and its dheshi’s brother that owns it now and he was a director
bottom line is once again rayner has voiced opinion publicly then in private voted the other way. And to be 100 % honest if you cant find a similar house/flat in 2 months then there is something wrong with you.
“In private”?
It is obviously public record which way MPs vote.
Kindly tell us exactly which way she voted on exactly which amendment and what she said about them.
You are saying she is being hypocritical, please show some proof.
Jenrick/Desmond?
The record number of immigrants that the current Gov are accepting?
You want Labour to sort that out?
Joke!
You want Govs to allocate housing from Westminster?
clause 30 she voted no
clause 15 she voted no
Jenrick i assume your referring to the 12000 that was donated 2 weeks after he gave planning permission? so what it was after the fact
Desmond wants to build 1358 houses in east london on an abandoned site again so what labour wants to build 150,000 so if you object to Desmond doing it you must object to starmas cabinet members doing it.
also on starmer how much funding has he received from developers hint its a dang sight more than 12 k
if they are insisting that 150,000 houses are built then arent they already doing that?? unless of course your suggesting that they will all go into the private sector and private landlords will get rich?
So what did Rayner say about those clauses?
What has she done wrong?
What was she voting against?
Jenrick approved the scheme on 14 January knowing that an approval by that date would enable Desmond to avoid having to pay a council-imposed infrastructure levy of between £30 and £50 million, which could have been used for funding schools and health clinics.[49][50] Tower Hamlets London Borough Council then pursued a judicial review against Jenrick’s decision in the High Court, arguing that it had shown bias towards Desmond. It was also reported that Jenrick had helped Desmond to save an additional £106m by allowing affordable housing at 21%, instead of enforcing the local and London-wide planning policy requirement of 35%.[51][52] This could have resulted in a total discount (and subsequent loss of revenue to the Exchequer) of approximately £150 million.[52]
In May 2020, Jenrick did not contest the judicial review, conceding that his sign-off of the scheme was “unlawful by reason of apparent bias”. He also confirmed that his approval had deliberately been issued before the new CIL policy could be adopted.
Wikipedia.
Clearly Jenrick helped avoidance of taxes and allowed fewer affordable homes to be built.
Well?
So how much has he received?
Or has the Labour received?