You remember my posting criteria …in the context of being in a pub?
You remind me of those kids at the zoo, stood behind a thick glass petition baiting the ferocious type animal on the other side, confident that there is nothing it can do to them.
I’ve actually ‘‘forgiven’’ you for it in my mind, I just think you are a bit sad and pathetic.,and that you vindicate my assumption on a regular basis.
Yes.
Time, after time, after time, you say I would not talk to your face as I would here on the www. You may well be right!
If i thought, remembering that I am a slightly built and older individual, that my physical safety was compromised, I might very well tone down the rhetoric.
Maybe that is so? Most probably is, I ain’t a mug.
But what does that mean?
That means, that anyone who resorts to such means, is tacitly admitting their arguments have lost.
It means that they want to stop the free speech of someone they disagree with.
It means that have more muscle than brain. And probably zero honour or decency.
But that is only my opinion. Take it or leave it.
Oh, and apart from being a 7st weakling, I am also a physical coward and can run away from anyone I dislike with no problem at all.
There: saved you a few lines of reply.
I know I am right,.I have dealt with people like you in more than one walk of life…you are typical of your type.
So maybe you should tone down your bravado in proportion to your stature and capabilities then eh?
Just a suggestion.
I’m all for free speech, I wholeheartedly practice it myself, I relish a debate or proportional argument in fact.
Nobody is going to stop me from doing that, but I have an awareness of tact (believe it or not) and I certainly know too well not to CROSS A LINE, or to bite off more than I can chew, …
So I CHOOSE to keep particularly offensive opinions to myself…unless I am attacked, (verbally or otherwise.)
I have actually been trained and instructed in this in fact in the distant past, and still find myself practicing some techniques today.
I.also have more respect for people… but not a lot of respect for gob sh***s and d/heads with ideas way above their station and capability, and who freely display that trait.
More of a zero tolerance policy in actual fact, which may be my weakness…admittedlly.
Anyhoo…enough of outing our ‘friend’ and his true colours.
Lets get back to the political cluster ■■■■ under Labour…specifically,.yep you guessed it.
Illegal immigrants.
Trump in the US,.(the guy getting so much stick on the other thread) sends his illegals and foreign criminals to a hotel…The Guantanamo Bay…view.
Starmer (the guy who getsva relatively very easy ride on here…bizzarelly) does this sort of thing with our assortment of freeloaders and criminals.
You could not make this sh up, and it gives an insight as to why they favour coming here, instead of staying in France.
Oh…But they do!
Like all the best propaganda it is a mixture of fact and fiction.
£6m bn on “asylum support” ? Yes.
Of course most of that is the bill for accommodation.
Why so large? Because the then gov economised on pay for immigration officials, so, the queues got longer, so, more money needed to be spent on providing accommodation…in ex-hotels, that did not now need modernisation, and would now have the Home Office giving them a steady income for months at a time…I wonder who that benefits most?
Is some of that money for other things? I expect it is.
Next point….ALL of the asylum funds come from out of the UK Foreign Aid Budget…The hostel rent, so that goes from the tax payer into the pockets of UK property owners…(I wonder who they vote for?)
If more money is spent on asylum seekers in the UK, then that money stays in the UK. And less is sent abroad.
To give a SIM card to an asylum seeker costs the UK tax payer an extra £zero.
So yes, maybe £6bn was spent in “asylum support” and I expect it did “include” zoo visits.
Not all of it was for jollies, most of it went to UK businesses, and it cost you and me an extra zilch.
Ex govts, officials…even ‘‘hostels’’ . and who it goes to…
'A big hand for Comical Ali ladies & gentlemen.
Itemising and break downs do not alter the FACT that we are wasting millions on this scrounging scum under the guise of refugees seeking asylum,.which could be much better spent when you look around.
Yeah which you (unsuccessfully) attempted to put your usual derisory leftist agenda positive spin on…or at least a bit of damage limitation to laughingly attempt to make it somehow acceptable.
Newsflash…Didnt work!
Newsflash no2…It never will
And you just know that at some point we will have corrupt lefty lawyers and judges fighting to keep him in the country because deporting him would be against his human rights or put his “life in danger” in his country of origin.
Yep absolutely.
Perhaps the TN apologist will put him up in his spare room, you usually see those type of lefty clowns holding their ‘Refugees Welcome’ placards.
The vast majority in asylum do not come here.
Most stay in countries near to their home countries. Others go to different European and other countries.
Those who are established with wide family ties will tend to stay nearer the houses they own.
So, younger ones will tend to have less to hold them to home and so they go off to make their way in the wider world. Families will tend to keep their daughters nearer for safety.
So, guess what? It is mainly young men who end up far away in place like the UK.
The established families will want to stay back, but those who do get away will not be doing so lightly. If they are fleeing war zones they will not have sold the family farm or small business for a fortune. No one will be buying it.
Those who come here rather than stop off elsewhere will be likely have a reason such as family or friends already here, or maybe they speak English.
I daresay some will have access to UK media via www and will be mistaken in their belief that the UK offers much more to refugees than other countries do.
I think that Farage and others are doing sterling work, in shouting about the vast sums of money that asylum seekers get in the UK.
St Nigel of Florida is doing his bit in attracting many more!
If they have family or friends already legaly settled in the uk then they can apply for asylum from the first safe country or even their home country would save them the cost of coming all the way here illegally. Or is it they have already tried to apply and been turned down because they are “undesirables”
if they speak english there are lots of other countries they can stop at on the way that are more akin to their beliefs and way of life. Again they choose to pay more money to come all the way to the uk.
Round 1 to Liebour with a punishing letter to the head of the opposition (Sentencing Council)
Round 2 to the Sentencing Council for an absolute stunning put down showing a ruthless streak and utter contempt for their opponent with a resounding yuck fou