But I am sure that there is no point of banning polish word “P#o#l#a#k” from this site as it makes no sense for me that you are banning non-offensive polish words while “[zb]”, “[zb]”, “[zb]” “[zb]” “[zb]” “[zb]ć” and “[zb]” are still allowed Smile
Lol You even remembered about flexion and therefore there is a “ć” not included in the ban tool (which is quite smart for someone who don’t speak Polish, as the “ć” ending is an ending for basic form of the verb)
I am really impressed And now I feel guilty, I really don’t wanted to makes some work for you I wonder if you allowed word ■■■■■ now then?
orys:
Lol You even remembered about flexion and therefore there is a “ć” not included in the ban tool (which is quite smart for someone who don’t speak Polish, as the “ć” ending is an ending for basic form of the verb)
Hi orys, when you say “basic form,” does that mean the infinitive form?
(BTW, that’s a genuine question, and I asked it because I don’t know. )
kenno78:
I Make you right DieselDave!! The old [zb] thing whats going should be available in all Language’s too
Hi kenno78, That’s a great point mate, but I forsee a slight problem with the sheer number of different languages…
It’s not something I’d given any thought to, but just think of how many different nationalities of folk we have on here. Now just imagine the time needed for researching, inputting and maintaining a database of all possible swear words in all foreign languages and dialects.
TBH mate, I wouldn’t like to attempt that job…
No need for that job to be attempted, Rule 5 would pretty much cover it.
You’ve just hit the very reason that I like this site so much.
IMHO, the balance between the need for rules Vs. the need for free speech is about as good as it gets.
Also IMHO, the way that rule #5 is written is a great example of this, and long may it continue.
Hi Orys my friend Daniel from Krakow has something to say.
Witaj, nie mialem okazji przeczytac wszystkiego na tym forum, i nie w pelni jestem w temacie, ale nie uwazam slowa ■■■■■ za obrazliwe, nie wiem kto stwierdzil, iz jest ono obrazliwe dla ■■■■■■■■ ale widocznie zna sie na tym lepiej niz Polacy:] Poza tym nasz jezyk zawiera tyle slow i zwrotow, iz mozemy kazdego obcokrajowca obrazic, a on nawet sie nie zorientuje, np. Brytol, choc tego slowa tez nie uwazam za obrazliwe. Pozdrowionka.
Daniel z Krakowa:
Witaj, nie mialem okazji przeczytac wszystkiego na tym forum, i nie w pelni jestem w temacie, ale nie uwazam slowa [zb] za obrazliwe, nie wiem kto stwierdzil, iz jest ono obrazliwe dla [zb], ale widocznie zna sie na tym lepiej niz Polacy:] Poza tym nasz jezyk zawiera tyle slow i zwrotow, iz mozemy kazdego obcokrajowca obrazic, a on nawet sie nie zorientuje, np. Brytol, choc tego slowa tez nie uwazam za obrazliwe. Pozdrowionka.
For others: HI, i had no chance to read everything on this forum and I am not fully in this subject, but I don’t think that work ■■■■■ is offending. I don’t know who invented that it’s offending for Poles, but obviously he knows more about it then Poles Apart of that our language includes so many words and expressions that we can offend every foreigner and he won’t even notice, for instance Brytol, although I don’t condider that word as offensive as well. Greetings.
Macka Packa: > ( there we go post edited again for you. its not a problem saying pakistani but not the shorter version. ive put the correct word in for so you can look at it and remember how to spell it.) jd
Excellent
Can you stop people saying eastern Europreans,
as i feel this is a generalisation,
And isnt the heel of Italy,and all Greece and Cyprus part of East Europe,
Also i find the term Brits offensive so can you do a search on the term Brits and change it to British.
yes of course.
Me thinks someone’s on a power trip, you’ve done more deleting than tipex in the last 2 days.
And I bet your the biggest racial biggot there is when your doing other things