Load security & vosa

about 18 months ago I attended a course regarding Load Security that was held at the Health & Safety Laboratory in Buxton. This is part of the HSE and is used to generally carry out research in order to be able to advise Government etc.

Whilst there the trainer told us that she had recently been working with VOSA and was devising a training plan so that all VOSA officers could be trained in load security with a view to better roadside enforcement.

Whilst I have since heard some stories regarding VOSA stopping curtainsiders and checking loads etc - I havenā€™t heard a great deal and I thought this issue might have dropped by the wayside. Apparently not and I have just seen the below from the FTA

QUOTE
The Vehicle Operator and Services Agency (VOSA) is introducing training for enforcement examiners with a focused approach on securing of loads, enabling them to identify high-risk loads. This will be rolled out from April 2012. The aim is to promote clarity and consistency for operators in enforcement of load securing. The initiative has been in development for some time, following a campaign in early 2010 by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and VOSA when enforcement examiners inspected the loads of vehicles to ensure that they were being transported securely. Similar spot checks took place in early 2009. Both campaigns highlighted concern that significant numbers of vehicles were found to have loads which were not sufficiently restrained.
During the past two years an industry-led working group, which includes representation from FTA, has been involved in discussions with VOSA and the Health and Safety Laboratory (HSL) to review current load securing practice. This made recommendations for VOSA enforcement staff to be adequately trained in assessing load securing and drafted guidance for operators, consignors and drivers which will be representative of, and coincide with, the training and guidelines given to VOSA examiners. The guidance, funded and published by HSL and supported and endorsed by the industry working group representatives, will be launched at this yearā€™s CV Show in April. VOSA has produced a draft matrix to assist examiners in assessing load securing methods. The matrix distinguishes between various types of load and has three categories of severity for assessing load securing. Any problems concerning the securing of the load will be assessed against the matrix and may result in prohibition action (P) for higher risk circumstances or an advisory notice (A) for minor problems.
HSE research has shown that unsafe loads on vehicles cost UK businesses millions of pounds in damaged goods each year. Vehicles carrying unrestrained loads are also a safety risk to their drivers and other staff involved in loading and unloading them. On the road they also pose a danger to other road users and the public at large. An unrestrained load can significantly increase the risk of vehicle rolling over or spilling its load onto the highway.
To protect drivers and other road users, the (Road Vehicles) Construction and Use Regulations 1986 indicate that loads must be secured, if necessary by physical restraint other than their own weight, so they donā€™t present a danger or nuisance. VOSA can enforce a range of regulatory powers, including prohibiting the continued use of the vehicle if they feel there is serious risk to other road users, workers or to the driver and has stated that operators who are currently complying with the Construction and Use Regulations should see no difference in VOSAā€™s enforcement policy from April. Minor problems in the way vehicles have been loaded and secured will be dealt with through advice rather than enforcement action wherever possible.

The ā€˜matrixā€™ they refer to is currently here http://www.fta.co.uk/_galleries/downloads/loading_of_vehicles/vosa_enforcement_matrix120307.pdf - I donā€™t know how long this document will remain available.

Obviously most drivers take load security seriously but my experience shows some simply close the curtains and take their chances. Whilst none of the above is an actual change to the current law/regulations - it does show that VOSA are moving towards better enforcement of these rules. VOSA will clearly be changing their tactics in the near future and hopefully the above is of use to someone.

Pete

Yeah, they should be more like BAG about load security :smiley:
No one can be bothered in here.

You generally find with vosa, a fine depends whether the officer got his leg over last night. If he did and youā€™ve done bad, flea in your ear. If your cards are spot on and your load triple bolted to the floor, but he found the milkman hanging from his old ladies back doors last nightā€¦

DHL wont use me because they say I take to long because I strap the load down :unamused:

most of the rules and regs are a pain in the arse. i find them prety useless, money making scams.
i take load securing prety seriously, but will these vosa men really know what they are on about?
i know my stuff from starting at the bottom, and working my way up. none of it was from a classroom.
the intension of making the roads safer by having loads secured properly is great news, but sadly it will be a bunch of know sod all hitlers collecting revenue.

1 Like

Good link to the matrix, I just hope it will be used with a bit of sence as well, seems to be a lot of emphasis on loading against head board, yes i know good pratice, but not always practical, to get axle weights right (more so on a rigid), with a front mount crane to load/unload tight to head board, a winch on the bed of a plant lorry low loader so you cant get load up to head board, non runner plant left on ramp at back so can be free wheeled off.
Surly if the load is lashed down right does it matter were it is?
I just hope it wont be the matrix in hand tick, tick, tick, and write out fixed pently or probation, with out looking at bigger picture.

This thread has got me thinking, so would you strap this lot down?
This is scrap rail track, rail. Our wagons have drop sides, the load is obviously never any higher than half way up the sides as I run out of pay load capacity before I do volume with this stuff. 30 pieces of 20 feet long is 10 ton and no one has ever bothered strapping down scrap rail before on these. The open sides in the middle of the bed are obviously in the closed position when in transit. Unless you turned the truck upside down, it stays where it is.
How far do you with this crap?
That matrix above is as clear as mud. :confused: :confused:

2011-07-11_09-33-54_110720111482.jpg

All the points mentioned about why the load couldnā€™t be against the headboard etc are valid ā€¦ but VOSA would expect the load to be adjusted accordingly so that it could be secured correctly - or donā€™t carry it.

Last week a driver I know was carrying 2 sheets of steel with a combined weight of 22t. he put them in the middle of the flat and chained them - with 1 chain over the middle. Highly experienced driver - never had any issues previously.

In slow moving traffic - lapse of concentration and he suddenly had to slam the brakes on to avoid the car in front that had stopped. he avoided the back of the car alright but the sheet steel behind him ripped the headboard off the trailer and has written the cab off. Luckily for him it veered to the near side. Pushed the passenger seat out the side window. The floor down by the pedals is bowed up - cab is defo a write off. he escaped uninjured ā€¦

The problem was - the steel weighed 22t. The force the chains applied on such a flat load was next to nothing - the angle of the chains was just to shallow. The steel was a good few feet from the headboard and had the opportunity to gain momentum. he didnā€™t put any wood or anything between the sheets. He also had nothing under the bottom sheet and I reckon it was resting on the steel sides of the trailer ā€¦ nice and slippy.

A standard headboard is only built to withstand around 5t. Doesnā€™t have to hold any more than that.

A load should be secured 100% of its weight in a forward direction, 50% sideways, rearwards and upwards. I reckon his chains probably applied less than 5t to the sheets. Driver still maintains it wasnā€™t his fault. he actually said ā€œThe weight should have held it I donā€™t know why it shifted. I was only doing around 20 mphā€

There were so many things he could have done differently and having got away with his life still doesnā€™t see the point I have tried to make. he could have died - as could someone else.

Three mornings in a row last week I have followed a 7.5 tonner with scrap cars on the back. One car sat on itā€™s belly (no wheels) and the other sat at an angle on top - resting on the roof of the bottom car and the deck of the wagon at the front. he had put the side boards and tailgate up (what good they do I donā€™t know) - no other lashings/straps/chains at all - nothing. I actually saw one of the cars on top slip sideways as he went round a corner. i could see from the way he was driving and kept checking his mirror he knew the load wasnā€™t particularly safe.

Why would a driver do this? One day one of those top cars is gonna land on someone.

As far as I could see, load type A, defect cat 1 (no load securing) = P, which I`m guessing is probation (and A is for advise).
According to their matrix load it tight to head board, couple of straps across, good to go.

pig pen:
As far as I could see, load type A, defect cat 1 (no load securing) = P, which I`m guessing is probation (and A is for advise).
According to their matrix load it tight to head board, couple of straps across, good to go.

I guess your probably right on the money there mate!

Gembo:
This thread has got me thinking, so would you strap this lot down?
This is scrap rail track, rail. Our wagons have drop sides, the load is obviously never any higher than half way up the sides as I run out of pay load capacity before I do volume with this stuff. 30 pieces of 20 feet long is 10 ton and no one has ever bothered strapping down scrap rail before on these. The open sides in the middle of the bed are obviously in the closed position when in transit. Unless you turned the truck upside down, it stays where it is.
How far do you with this crap?
That matrix above is as clear as mud. :confused: :confused:

Yeah itā€™ll never move ā€¦ till one day you have to slam on due to some other idiot.

I have a training video that re-enacts a real situation where the driver died, crushed to death over about 15 minutes by the load of steel he was carrying. he braked for a junction and the steel went through his cab. he died whilst the firefighters tried to remove his 12 tonne load. They claim he was only travelling at 15mph

One of the things the commentary on this video says is "Most drivers say this kind of thing never happens. Unfortunately you are unlikely to hear from those that know it does".

Looks to me like any one of those rail tracks could punch through the headboard in the right circumstances. But like you say - nobody ever fastens them down and it hasnā€™t gone wrong yet.

How far do you go with this crap? Depends how much you want your licence.

The Road traffic Act 1991 basically says ā€œTHE DRIVER IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOAD CARRIED ON THEIR VEHICLE, WHETHER OR NOT THEY WERE INVOLVED IN THE SECURING OF THE LOADā€

It also says ā€œA person is guilty of using a vehicle in a DANGEROUS CONDITION if he uses, or causes or permits another to use, a motor vehicle or trailer on a road when the purpose for which it is used or the weight position or distribution of its load, OR THE MANNER IN WHICH IT IS SECURED is such that the use of the motor vehicle or trailer involves a danger of injury to any personā€

And goes on to say "A person is to be regarded as DRIVING DANGEROUSLY if it would be obvious to a COMPETENT and CAREFUL driver that driving the vehicle in its current state would be dangerous.
In determining the state of the vehicle for this purpose, regard may be had to anything attached or carried on or in it and to the manner in which it is ATTACHED or carried"

One sentance from the Code Of Practice for load security that may be of interest is ā€œLoads transported on the road MUST be SECURED TO THE VEHICLE THAT CARRIES THEMā€

pig pen:
As far as I could see, load type A, defect cat 1 (no load securing) = P, which I`m guessing is probation (and A is for advise).
According to their matrix load it tight to head board, couple of straps across, good to go.

The DFT code of practice recommends a lashing at least every 1.5 metres and at least 3 lashings per item/stack. Front, centre, rear. Stops twisting of the load.

Yep - you are about right. Tight to headboard. Sufficient straps and away you go. Unfortunately some loads just arenā€™t that user friendly. All the responsibility is placed on the driver who at times simply cannot win and simply does his best with what he is given.

Thereā€™s a lot needs to change in the industry - thatā€™s for sure - and until some of the suppliers/manufacturers and hauliers are penalised it wonā€™t change. Poor old driver stuck at the sharp end with no choice but to get the job done.

shep532:

Gembo:
This thread has got me thinking, so would you strap this lot down?
This is scrap rail track, rail. Our wagons have drop sides, the load is obviously never any higher than half way up the sides as I run out of pay load capacity before I do volume with this stuff. 30 pieces of 20 feet long is 10 ton and no one has ever bothered strapping down scrap rail before on these. The open sides in the middle of the bed are obviously in the closed position when in transit. Unless you turned the truck upside down, it stays where it is.
How far do you with this crap?
That matrix above is as clear as mud. :confused: :confused:

Yeah itā€™ll never move ā€¦ till one day you have to slam on due to some other idiot.

I have a training video that re-enacts a real situation where the driver died, crushed to death over about 15 minutes by the load of steel he was carrying. he braked for a junction and the steel went through his cab. he died whilst the firefighters tried to remove his 12 tonne load. They claim he was only travelling at 15mph

One of the things the commentary on this video says is "Most drivers say this kind of thing never happens. Unfortunately you are unlikely to hear from those that know it does".

Looks to me like any one of those rail tracks could punch through the headboard in the right circumstances. But like you say - nobody ever fastens them down and it hasnā€™t gone wrong yet.

How far do you go with this crap? Depends how much you want your licence.

The Road traffic Act 1991 basically says ā€œTHE DRIVER IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOAD CARRIED ON THEIR VEHICLE, WHETHER OR NOT THEY WERE INVOLVED IN THE SECURING OF THE LOADā€

It also says ā€œA person is guilty of using a vehicle in a DANGEROUS CONDITION if he uses, or causes or permits another to use, a motor vehicle or trailer on a road when the purpose for which it is used or the weight position or distribution of its load, OR THE MANNER IN WHICH IT IS SECURED is such that the use of the motor vehicle or trailer involves a danger of injury to any personā€

And goes on to say "A person is to be regarded as DRIVING DANGEROUSLY if it would be obvious to a COMPETENT and CAREFUL driver that driving the vehicle in its current state would be dangerous.
In determining the state of the vehicle for this purpose, regard may be had to anything attached or carried on or in it and to the manner in which it is ATTACHED or carried"

One sentance from the Code Of Practice for load security that may be of interest is ā€œLoads transported on the road MUST be SECURED TO THE VEHICLE THAT CARRIES THEMā€

I agree with that Shep but what i find hard to fathom is that if its going to slide, straps wont stop it, itl slide as only the top most lengths will be touching the straps. But, i will from now on leave the lashing eyes clear and strap it down to keep them happy. And yes, getting all the lengths against the headboard is nigh on impossible and they are to heavy / grippy to slide useing a bar.

makes me wonder if OP is trying to drum up business using scare tactics for courses he/they are running :question:

Being a bit ā– ā– ā– ā–  about it - those lengths of steel should be neatly stacked and banded tightly together - then secured to the vehicle. But in the real world that just isnā€™t going to happen is it and as a driver you are pretty much struggling to do right.

As with most things it takes something to go wrong before a solution will be found by management. Each day you carry on doing what you are doing - they are happy.

I used to manufacture airport equipment - mainly little baggage trailers you see whizzing round the airport in a long line. We used to load them in curtain siders stacked in piles of three or four with three stacks to a 45 footer. these things were on wheels and the driver would just throw a quick strap over and shut the curtains.

Quite often they would be damaged when they got where they were going because they had all shifted and the stacks collapsed - we just claimed off the haulier :wink: That was until i got the phone call a full load of 12 trailers had come out the back doors (landing on a car) whilst going up a hill only about 5 miles from my factory. Health & Safety bods soon paid me a visit and changes were made. We manufactured little wheel chocks and steel stands to support the stacks of trailers. We steel banded the stacks and we made sure the driver secured the stacks appropriatly. it never happened again.

I havenā€™t worked there in about 15 years - but when I passed the other day I smiled when I saw they still loaded them using all the equipment.

As I said - it takes the job to go wrong before change is made :unamused:

green456:
makes me wonder if OP is trying to drum up business using scare tactics for courses he/they are running :question:

Iā€™ll have to read my posts again and see where I mentioned courses :wink:

I obviously made the whole thing up including the link that appears to go to the FTAā€™s own website :confused:

How is it scare tactics when all of it is fact?

I just happen to have a ā€˜thingā€™ about load security and I am generally appalled at what I often see out on the roads.

But yeah ā€¦ Iā€™ll come clean. Iā€™m a DCPC trainer and donā€™t drive a wagon. What do i know? :unamused:

What Iā€™d like to know is who are the ones training up VOSA inspectors on load security, what are their credentials, qualifications and experience. Iā€™m all for safer movement of loads but the guidelines have to come from a body that has the above from practical and hands on experience in the field and not just from sitting behind a desk and thinking up what they think is best. Franky.

shep532:

green456:
makes me wonder if OP is trying to drum up business using scare tactics for courses he/they are running :question:

Iā€™ll have to read my posts again and see where I mentioned courses :wink:

I obviously made the whole thing up including the link that appears to go to the FTAā€™s own website :confused:

How is it scare tactics when all of it is fact?

I just happen to have a ā€˜thingā€™ about load security and I am generally appalled at what I often see out on the roads.

But yeah ā€¦ Iā€™ll come clean. Iā€™m a DCPC trainer and donā€™t drive a wagon. What do i know? :unamused:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=81921

Gembo:
This thread has got me thinking, so would you strap this lot down?
This is scrap rail track, rail. Our wagons have drop sides, the load is obviously never any higher than half way up the sides as I run out of pay load capacity before I do volume with this stuff. 30 pieces of 20 feet long is 10 ton and no one has ever bothered strapping down scrap rail before on these. The open sides in the middle of the bed are obviously in the closed position when in transit. Unless you turned the truck upside down, it stays where it is.
How far do you with this crap?
That matrix above is as clear as mud. :confused: :confused:

So exactly how are drop sides doing zb all to actually ā€˜holdā€™ anything in the sideways plane and do you realise the forces involved if all that lot decides to start shifting sideways.From the point of view of load security a drop side is more or less not much different to a flat and drop sides arenā€™t there to do the job of chains/straps etc.

Frankydobo:
What Iā€™d like to know is who are the ones training up VOSA inspectors on load security, what are their credentials, qualifications and experience. Iā€™m all for safer movement of loads but the guidelines have to come from a body that has the above from practical and hands on experience in the field and not just from sitting behind a desk and thinking up what they think is best. Franky.

The Health & Safety Laboratory is a pretty unique place with facilities for testing and replicating all sorts of conditions. These are the people - as far as I am aware - that have been involved in advising the authorities. They even had their own Challenger Armoured Recovery vehicle on site - not many places can buy one of them :wink: They specialise in testing things to destruction and I know they had been testing various methods of lashing down all types of loads and then carrying out controlled instances. of course a lot of the staff are ā€˜boffinsā€™ and may never have gained any real world experience ā€¦ but they employ specialists as required. (Nice place to work)

As far as I am aware they have been developing the training courses for at least 3 years. They have had their boffins out on the road with VOSA stopping and checking loads. I know one of the guys I was talking to had been a driver for many years and had been involved in the process.

The problem is that everyones loads are different and pretty much no two are ever the same kind of thing. What one person says is safe - another will say isnā€™t. therefore - by the look of that matrix VOSA are setting some clear cut guidlines for them to work to and I figured some people might like to see the information.

I do agree with what you are saying - lets face it sometimes VOSA donā€™t know what they are talking about (ADR for example) yet they are still there enforcing it but with the wrong information. Giving them a bit of training in load security is just going to add another string to their ā€œI know a bit about itā€ bow. There again - some of them just might be previously very experienced in such matters.