I presume you are replying to me (I may be mistaken}.
Israel has never laid down arms, not since its creation.
Admit it: you’re a Zionist
Not the adjective I would have chosen, but you’ve probably got more tact and better manners than me. 
1 Like
Bearing in mind the adjective to describe you would obviously put you on the anti Semitic, anti IDF, anti Jewish State, side of history.Including the Soviet backed Arab alliance in 1967 and '73.Good luck with that.
If Zionist means pro Israel Jewish State, pro IDF v Socialist anti Semitism yes I’m a Zionist.
Admit it you’re just an anti Israel Socialist.
I asked is the disarmament of the IDF and its withdrawal from Golan and Gaza what you want ? .
What do you think happens next ?.
Golan and Gaza and the West Bank, yes. My crystal balls aren’t up to speed so I don’t know what might happen if the genocidal Zionist thugs get out, but I do know 1) Israel refuses to consider a two-state solution; 2) The US and the UK will not sue for peace and Netanyahu and his allied scum in the Knesset know it; and 3) given your admission that you’re pro-IDF, I already know what your response will be.
As to your remark that I am
just an anti Israel Socialist.
… I am anti-anyone who commits war crimes and especially genocide. If that makes me a Socialist in your opinion, I’ll wear it.
3 Likes
Manners maketh man 
1 Like
Agreed, but some are sent to try us, stretching manners to the max.
I wouldn’t mind so much if they contributed something useful. Or, at least, entertaining. 
I find our mutual friend to be (unintentionally) highly entertaining, even if it is only as living proof of the Dunning-Kruger effect
1 Like
Or about which they had a basic understanding.
1 Like
He used to be, but now he’s extremely irritating. I think he’s very insecure, which is why he tries to appear knowledgeable about subjects of which he has no idea.
Dunning-Kruger is so rightly linked to much of his input.
I’ve tended to believe our mutual friend is the way he is because he’s “on the spectrum”.
I think my mate old Carryfast is getting a raw deal here.
If you want annoying, and irritating (deleted 
) …
I put forward one word, in a nominatory context.
That word is Franglais.
Or ME…hopefully 
(being that I am of a mischievous nature who lurrves to annoy the ‘right’ people😁)
So your solution is for the IDF to withdraw from Golan and Gaza and the partition of Israel on the basis that Iran and all the Arab states will then live peacefully and happily ever after with their Jewish friends and neighbours.
So if the Soviet backed Arabs had won in 1967 or '73 you’re saying that the resulting Arab victory and IDF surrender would all have been on friendly terms no war crimes by the Soviet Socialist backed Islamic Arab scum to see here according to the anti Semitic British Socialist apologists.
Now with that Middle Eastern paragon of virtue Islamic Revolutionary Iran added to Israel’s friendly neighbours.