quote=“del949”]Trux I don’t think that the comparison with agency drivers etc is accurate…
[/quote]
I beg to differ on that one but each to their own opinion.
del949:
Agency workers, wether in cabs, warehouses or picking crops in the field ,actually do the same job as their full time counterparts…
Got it in a nutshell, exactly what i was aiming at !
del949:
PCSO’s and HATSO’s do not do the same job as their police counterparts…
True , and they were never intended to be so, but they were implemented to work alongside the Police role and relieve the Police of the mundane duties and free them up and be in public prescence should someone require their assistance.
Though in some aspects they do some similar things of police role untill the “proper” police arrive on scene if needed and take over.
Anything is better than Nothing.
del949:
Yes, agency workers etc are usually employed to cut costs, but for doing the same job as a full time worker…
Exactly what I was getting at. We deffinitley agree on that one.
del949:
Hatso’s are not employed to do the same as police patrols and as I have said previousley I cannot see that they provide a worthwhile service, especially when compared to the cost of setting them up…
Seems to me they do respond to and assist Motorways Police to incidents on the motorways and some trunk roads, and do a very good job of it too.
Do we really need a police patrol ■■■■■■■ stopping at people broken down or ran out of fuel ? when the police can be catching the true criminals and law-breakers ?
del949:
They can ony be slightly cheaper than police officers as the only difference in cost that I can see is the wage. The equipment used etc is virtually the same and operting costs must be similar.
Added to this cost is the infrastructure of their administration, which must virtually duplicate the police admin…
point exactly , cheaper .
One is locally funded and you pay your council tax charges towards -
the other is government funded.
Both ways you get taxed on it.
As for administration, more staff – more supervising, same amount of staffing required. So no difference there .
It would be interesting to see the “end of year” financial reports and compare the two.
But as one is still developing from a fairly fresh start a true “fair” comparison might not yet be viable for a couple of years yet. but i could be wrong.
I
del949:
if, therefore they were abolished, the saving in duplicated costings plus the saving in wages would enable to authorities to provide more “proper” policing…
Wouldnt make any difference, same costs involved if not more probably. Thats the intention, to free up "proper" policing. I
m sure the big-boys up top of Government have already made lots of considerations regarding any diversifying.