gsm31:
annitram:
muckles:
annitram:
Please note muckles that the stats you quote are based on the 2001 census and therefore not as relevant as they might be to the thread a large portion of eastern european migrants will have arrived within the last 7 years.
It does say 2008 est, but if you have better information then please post it. 
How about this for a quote from the migrationwatch website (cheers MikeC)
Commenting on the failure of the Government to control immigration over the past 11 years, Phil Woolas, the new Immigration Minister is reported in The Sun as saying: He said âPeople didnât believe the authorities knew what they were doing and thereâs a very good reason for that - they didnât.â (October 21, 2008)
Not long ago five illegals were discovered cleaning the Home Office Department responsible for dealing with . . . what else? Illegal immigrants.
And Ministers reckon there are up to 570,000 people here who shouldnât be. It will take 20 years to deport them â if no more arrive in the meantime, that is.
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith was once asked whether any illegal immigrants were still working at the Home Office, after another was found guarding the main entrance. She said she had âno ideaâ.
Which just about sums up the Governmentâs approach to a problem that will only get worse as the recession bites â clueless.
No doubt Kenny still thinks The Home Office are doing a great job.

Believe it or not the home office has been caught out massaging the immigration stats again which obviously means NO ONE knows the truth its all guesswork but no will believe that the government stats are anything but underestimated.
The following is from the Daily Telegraph.
Well, well: the statistical chickens are coming home to roost for a government that has long played fast and loose with official figures.
The Home Office apologised for interfering with immigration figures
The Home Office has been forced to say sorry for seeking to interfere in the way immigration figures were released recently.
It seems old habits die hard. In order to inject some credibility into official figures, the Government agreed that they should all be issued by a new armâs length body under the auspices of the new UK Statistics Authority.
But when immigration figures were published last week, the Home Office sent an official along to the Office for National Statistics briefing to hand out a press release that gave a distinctly unbalanced take on the subject.
The Home Office decided that the subject of greatest importance was a decline in the number of eastern Europeans coming to the UK, a line that was apparently followed up by at least one national newspaper.
Now, Prof David Hand, the head of the Royal Statistical Society, has complained that this âsucceeded in partially diverting some journalistsâ attention away from the comprehensive range of data being presented towards one specific issueâ.
In truth, it should not have had this effect because any journalist following immigration and crime figures over the years have known to take any Home Office press notice with a pinch of salt.
They are always selective with their use of the statistics in order to cast the government in a positive light. That is why public faith in official figures has plummeted over the years.
As Prof Hand says in a letter to Sir Michal Scholar, head of the UK Statistics Authority: âThe whole incident epitomises some of the bad practices that have helped to undermine public confidence in official statistics⌠At worst this can help to âburyâ news perceived as unfavourable to the Government.â
When you think of the vast sums of our money spent by the Government we at least have a basic right to know, without any statistical jiggery pokery, what we are getting for it.
Yet finding the truth, or anything like it, is often impossible because yardsticks are changed, goalposts moved, timescales altered, benchmarks lowered - all to make failure as difficult to discern as possible.
On the positive side, however, we appear to be seeing that rare creature: a state regulator with teeth. Previously, there was a Statistics Commission that was meant to keep an eye on all this but it was powerless to stop the abuse.
The head of the new statutory authority, Sir Michael Scholar, is a former permanent secretary at the Department of Trade and Industry. In an interview with this newspaper, he likened the creation of the authority to Gordon Brownâs decision to give independence to the Bank of England in 1997. âGood statistics are as important as sound money or clean water,â he said.
Maybe the Home Office and other departments have now got the message.