weeto:
Wheel Nut:
dieseldave:
truckuk:
Unfortunately I cannot agree with the statement that all periodic training attendance must be counted as ‘other work’, …I would therefore be prepared to argue that the time spent on the training course is not in this case ‘other work’.
Hi truckuk,
This might be a pointer…The awarding body for drivers’ ADR certificates in the UK is SQA, on behalf of the DfT.
Some ADR providers have also accredited their ADR course with JAUPT for either 7, 14, 21 or 28 DCPC hours.Whatever JAUPT’s view on this question is, the following is true nevertheless:
SQA publishes a Manual of Practice for ADR training providers, and adherence to the manual is a frequently checked prerequisite of holding a provider’s licence.
Section 7.11 of the manual says this:
Attendance at courses is a legal requirement and training providers must make trainees and their employers aware of the requirements of the drivers’ hours regulations. Time spent attending a course is likely to affect the amount of driving or other work they may undertake under the drivers’ hours regulations.
Section 9.1 of the Manual says this:
Providers must inform drivers and employers that the course requires the driver to be on duty, and the implications of this for the driver’s hours regulations.
Whenever I’m asked about this by guys on an ADR course, I always refer them to the relevant person in their company who monitors and controls their driver’s hours because I’m there to teach them ADR and not to become derailed by non-ADR stuff.
I believe in this case we should be following the letter of the law to the letter, not just if it suits, Steve
If you are required by your employer to attend a training session (i.e. a module of Driver CPC periodic training) then that time should be added to your drivers’ hours record as ‘other work’ if you are to follow the letter of the law and keep a true record.
This was taken from Truckuk website.
This “quick” question was asked of VOSA several months ago and this is the reply I received:
Dear Mr Nut
This is a complex area and it does depend on the individual circumstances. Where an operator undertakes in-house CPC training or pays for external training within normal working hours, then this is most likely to be construed as ‘working time’. However, if CPC training is undertaken by employees outside of normal working hours this would probably not be construed as working time if it is entirely voluntary.
A weekly rest under the EU drivers’ hours rules (Regulation 561/2006) must be an uninterrupted period where a driver may freely dispose of his time. Time spent working under obligation or instruction cannot be counted as rest. Drivers can of course take a reduced weekly rest of 24 hours but not on consecutive weekends.
Ultimately of course, it is for the Courts to interpret the legislation. I hope this helps though.
Kind regards
I believe the courts have already interpreted the legislation by stating that time taken doing the ADR must be counted as working time.
As ADR is a compulsory set format, as is JAUPT DCPC Training. I cannot see how it can be treated any differently.
You believe, or has there been an actual case.
Your quote above mine, has nothing to do with the EU tachograph legislation, that only mentions the RTD WTD.
As for your question about an actual case comes under this.
Please note that time spent attending the ADR course will count as duty time under Driver Hours Law Regulations 561/2006.
The ADR training and exams must be spent in a classroom and run to a strict format that is approved by the DFT
The DQC must also be taken in a strict environment with a minimum 7 hours in the classroom.
I don’t see any difference between the two