jakethesnake:
I am really surprised to hear you say that. I would like to know which videos you found to be negative.
It was a while ago and I don’t remember which ones, but basically as soon as I saw who it was I said to myself “Oh, not him again…”
I would say exactly the opposite about Dr Campbell. He always looks at the positive side rather than the negative and always apologises if he gets it wrong. He is known for giving correct information.
Considering the misinformation circulating on the t’inty web, there will always be some segment of the online community who will accept it as correct
You say you found this particular video was scaremongering. Look at the details, Dr. Campbell was only making people aware of what these scientists had been doing and asking why they had been doing this as it was totally unnecessary.
Most of what most scientists do could easily be seen by the average person as “unnecessary”, including most of my PhD thesis.
Hence my point about “pure science”, the fact is we NEVER know WHERE the next important discovery is going to come from, so all knowledge is potentially valuable.
This was not made public for scaremongering but there had been rumours about what these American scientists were doing and he was informing his viewers with what had been going on.
You can’t say what his motivation was for making his video, unless he’s a close personal friend of yours.
And no, I didn’t watch his whole video, why would I? I don’t need him to provide a biased view of a pre-peer-review publication, I’m well versed in reading scientific papers and identifying the relevant details, I used to do that for a living at one time. Additionally I’m still good friends with a former colleague from my academia days, who has been been very involved in “covid” research, so if I wanted another view on a paper we can all read for ourselves, I’d have a beer with him and chew the scientific facts.
Here’s the pre-print prior to peer review. It should hopefully be reasonably clear that the work was not unnecessary, they have found some very interesting results and it will inform future research.
biorxiv.org/content/10.1101 … 134v1.full
As for Stu, WAKE UP. 
Ah… I think Stu is far too dyed-in-the-wool now