Carryfast:
I’ve suggested ai link between the sarcastic, but weird font, 10 foot writing on certain bridges and the possibility that it signifies that the bridges in question aren’t accurately signed.Also the front of that trailer clearly hasn’t hit any bridge anywhere.Whats your problem with those observations.
Sarcastic font? Tagging/graffiti? Unfounded assumptions based on a photo?
Only you could conflate those into an argument that the bridge is incorrectly signed
Zac_A:
Carryfast:
I’ve suggested ai link between the sarcastic, but weird font, 10 foot writing on certain bridges and the possibility that it signifies that the bridges in question aren’t accurately signed.Also the front of that trailer clearly hasn’t hit any bridge anywhere.Whats your problem with those observations.Sarcastic font? Tagging/graffiti? Unfounded assumptions based on a photo?
Only you could conflate those into an argument that the bridge is incorrectly signed
The fact that the front of that trailer hasn’t hit any bridge is a fact not an assumption even for Stevie Wonder.As for the bridge having 15’9’’ of vertical clearance my eyes say no it will need a tape measur to confirm
This one 10’3
njl:
This one 10’3
"Castell Howell [vehicle owners] director Martin Jones said: “No-one was hurt, that is the main thing, and we are doing our own internal investigation.”
Yeah, brush it off like it ain’t a big deal, let’s pretend that it isn’t going to be a “career incident” for the driver, despite previous “wedged under a rail bridge” incidents like this one 
news.railbusinessdaily.com/driv … ay-bridge/