I think an LNG dual fuel would be the preferable approach as monofuel i don’t think would give another power. I knoe Tescos and Sainsbury run some LNG vehicles but very small percentage of their fleet
obviously you have only heard of dual-fuel lng trucks, that use diesel as well, not pure lng trucks. I suggest you look into them if you want some information after some yoga, meditation or whatever else you need to learn to play nice with others
milodon:
obviously you have only heard of dual-fuel lng trucks, that use diesel as well, not pure lng trucks. I suggest you look into them if you want some information after some yoga, meditation or whatever else you need to learn to play nice with others
Yes real good idea Buy some nice big ECU and 6 X 100 quid spark plugs oh and lets not forget machining 3 mill off the pistons .cheap as chips!
Bking:
Yes real good idea Buy some nice big ECU and 6 X 100 quid spark plugs oh and lets not forget machining 3 mill off the pistons .cheap as chips!
I don’t pretend to understand the whole issue here Bking, but aren’t you speaking of retro-fit in your answer?
I’m just thinking that if the vehicle were designed to be LNG (only) right from the start of its life, then surely fitting spark plugs machining 3mm off the piston crowns wouldn’t be needed.
How would one calculate what the effect of taking 3mm of the present pistons would be?
Is there a formula that taking X off the pistons gives X lowering of compression, which takes bore and stroke into account?
This is an interesting topic, so I’d love to know the answer to that before Carryfast posts so much to it that it becomes too much for a simple soul such as myself to understand.
Bking:
Yes real good idea Buy some nice big ECU and 6 X 100 quid spark plugs oh and lets not forget machining 3 mill off the pistons .cheap as chips!
I don’t pretend to understand the whole issue here Bking, but aren’t you speaking of retro-fit in your answer?
I’m just thinking that if the vehicle were designed to be LNG (only) right from the start of its life, then surely fitting spark plugs machining 3mm off the piston crowns wouldn’t be needed.
How would one calculate what the effect of taking 3mm of the present pistons would be?
Is there a formula that taking X off the pistons gives X lowering of compression, which takes bore and stroke into account?
This is an interesting topic, so I’d love to know the answer to that before Carryfast posts so much to it that it becomes too much for a simple soul such as myself to understand.
You need torque to pull 40 tonnes. Now you can provide torque by RPM from a petrol/gas engine or you can pump torque from a long stroke slow revving diesel. Slow running,cool ,long stroke diesels, are the best for economy and longevity. Not the most elegant engine but good at what its designed for.
Bking:
Yes real good idea Buy some nice big ECU and 6 X 100 quid spark plugs oh and lets not forget machining 3 mill off the pistons .cheap as chips!
I don’t pretend to understand the whole issue here Bking, but aren’t you speaking of retro-fit in your answer?
I’m just thinking that if the vehicle were designed to be LNG (only) right from the start of its life, then surely fitting spark plugs machining 3mm off the piston crowns wouldn’t be needed.
How would one calculate what the effect of taking 3mm of the present pistons would be?
Is there a formula that taking X off the pistons gives X lowering of compression, which takes bore and stroke into account?
This is an interesting topic, so I’d love to know the answer to that before Carryfast posts so much to it that it becomes too much for a simple soul such as myself to understand.
You need torque to pull 40 tonnes. Now you can provide torque by RPM from a petrol/gas engine or you can pump torque from a long stroke slow revving diesel. Slow running,cool ,long stroke diesels, are the best for economy and longevity. Not the most elegant engine but good at what its designed for.
Hi Bking,
Understood and agreed about Diesels, but I wasn’t sure about LNG
LNG engines are really glorified petrol engines.
Nobody makes them ,as 14 litre petrols are a “bit thirsty” specially when your pulling a 30 tonne caravan.
So you get a 14 litre diesel reduce the compression ratio by cutting a few mill off the piston crown(easier than changing crank throw) and stops pre ignition. Fit a crank position sensor,air flow sensor,mapped ecu and spark plugs.
Most reduce turbo charging to keep the motor cool.
Big problem is that because of inertial mass,the engine still has the characteristics of a big diesel that is trying to give its best at low rpm on a fuel that is designed to run in high rpm engines.
Most spark ignition engines dont even start to produce any real torque before 2000 rpm.
Now you got some old slugger that peaks at 1700 trying to be a Porsche.
Thats why LNG dont work in a modified diesel
This link goes to a 6 minute video explaining ■■■■■■■■ 12 litre CNG/LNG truck engine. Rated up to 400 bhp, 1450 Lb/ft torque, new 4 valve head for spark plugs and different piston crown. Wastegated turbo, of course.