JeffA:
I read - I think it was Marky-p - saying that capitalism was what made the UK. But the version of capitalism we’ve had since Thatcher took over isn’t the same capitalism that built the UK. Up until Thatcher you could expect a decent job, to buy your own house, the CEO maybe earned ten times as much as his lowest paid worker.
Now we have this bizarre, extreme version of “capitalism” where you sell off the water supply to private-equity asset strippers who run up 54 billion in debt, overcharge customers and funnel 66 billion to private shareholders while dumping all the excrement in the rivers. Where CEO’s earn 50-100 times what their lowest paid worker gets, where decent jobs are few and far between and where young people have little chance of buying a house. That’s not capitalism - that’s Eton school tories in red braces running away with themselves. No other country in the world has ever flogged their water supply to private equity asset-strippers. The tories ideology is that “the market will compete with itself” - obviously a completely bankrupt theory.
Of course getting the tories to admit they’ve been following bankrupt policies for the last 40 years isn’t going to happen - so presumably the taxpayer will cop for the 14 billion debt then when it’s back in profit, it will be sold to a private equity firm so they can take all the profits.
I thought I felt my ears burning - I feel like a celebrity having my name mentioned in a post!
Anyhow, the Thameswater situation aside…even though I obviously prefer capitalism, I know that this system is not perfect and has flaws and bad actors; and in a lot of cases where the CEO is incompetent. The system itself was not specifically designed to be exploitative, you just have pricks within the system.
However, if people expect high performing CEO’s should get paid the same or just a little more than the lowest paid worker then we wouldn’t have great people building/running great companies that create jobs and provide great products and great services. There’d be no incentive to become a CEO. If I was the chairman of the board of a company (I myself appointed someone to be my chairman so I have some experience in this area), I would try to find the best CEO we could afford to grow the company. The best people expect and deserve the best compensation for their high performance. This is just a natural part of the marketplace we call capitalism.
Obviously bad behaviour and dishonest practices should be held accountable and regulated but there is also a danger of over-regulation and over-taxation by government. In France, around 15,000 millionaires (and billionaires I’d imagine) left the country between 2015-2016 as they were facing an exorbitant tax increase. So they took their money and businesses and Foxtrot-Oscar’d. Good for them, but not so good for the people they employed who then lost their jobs.
Also, I feel like this truck forum has now turned into a politics debate platform 