Couldn’t see that much damage to the van yet it caused £2k damage to the truck. Total idiot though.
madmackem:
Couldn’t see that much damage to the van yet it caused £2k damage to the truck. Total idiot though.
Truck headlight / panel there’s 2k without breaking a sweat
Is this a news article or an advertisement for VisionTrack?
From what I can see the driver of the van does not brake or swerve or even move his arms which I would expect had he been in a RTA.
His van doesn’t appear to be damaged, though he has a scratch on his bumper, not clear if that was there already, only on my phone. He could have even been avoiding debris on the road or another vehicle. I wonder if he has been charged, because I do not see his name anywhere.
Absolutely amazing that this is deemed newsworthy.
Hmmm, I smell bs here. Even the mirror used the word allegedly. No damage to the wan, no rocking side to side motion, not even slowing down. I’d say (with my tnuk csi head on) the driver had caused the damage elsewhere, and either hid the fact from, or colluded with the boss to use this non event to claim for repairs. No sound either, so you can’t even hear an impact. Van driver was clearly a bell end of the first order, but I just don’t buy the impact scenario