LORRY driver Andrew Davies has been jailed for seven-and-a-half years after indecently assaulting three girls.
Judge Paul Glenn yesterday described the pervert as ‘cunning and manipulative’ and placed him on the ■■■ offenders’ register for life.
​
JAILED: Andrew Davies.
Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court heard Davies, pictured right, aged 48, indecently assaulted one youngster in Yorkshire in 2002.
The girl told her sister and mum what had happened but no charges were brought against Davies.
The court heard weeks later Davies moved to Stoke-on-Trent and started work as a lorry driver.
Prosecutor David Jackson said Davies repeatedly indecently assaulted his second victim in his lorry.
The court heard the third victim was forced to perform a ■■■ act on Davies.
He later threatened the girl: “Don’t you dare tell anyone about this.”
The two Stoke-on-Trent victims reported Davies’s behaviour years later.
He denied the allegations and that he was ■■■■■■■■ attracted to young girls.
But earlier this year, Davies, who moved to Lancashire, pleaded guilty to seven charges of indecent assault on three girls between 2001 and 2003.
Rebecca Young, mitigating, said Davies has lost everything and all contact with his family and friends.
But she said Davies saved his victims the trauma of having to give evidence in a trial.
Miss Young added: “It has to be accepted on his behalf that all these offences will have had a devastating effect on all the girls and hopefully his guilty pleas will give them some closure.”
Judge Glenn said there was a significant risk of Davies causing serious harm to children. The judge said Davies was ‘persistent’ with his first victim and ‘physically forced’ his third victim.
Judge Glenn told Davies: "It is plain you have a ■■■■■■ attraction to young females.
“You are cunning and manipulative. It is plain you are an isolated individual now.”
Staffordshire Police today welcomed the sentence.
Detective Constable Darren Bithell said: "This sentence follows a lengthy investigation. We thoroughly investigate all allegations of ■■■■■■ abuse, including historic offences, and work with partners to tackle these very serious crimes in a sensitive manner.
“Anyone with information about suspected ■■■■■■ abuse should contact our Protecting Vulnerable People Department on 101.”
0
Shoshaye:
He should never see daylight again imo,I hope he gets what he deserves in prison.
That’s one of the problems in prison now mate, the mamby pamby human rights brigade has given ■■■■■■■■ like this the use of segregation wings so others can’t get to them. Too much bloody luxury inside, flush toilets, tv, dvd, computers etc. Take it back to the days of an iron bed, mattress, bucket which needed slopping out and wardens who accidentally left some doors open.
And where were these kids parents while all this was going on?
Watching Coronation Street,down the pub,shopping in bloody Tesco.
Im not saying that this did not nor does not happen.
But I take EVERYTHING I read in “newspapers” on television or fed to me by “the state” with a very large dose of salt.
Oldest ploy in the world to build a bogey man eg, Immigrants,Dole cheats,■■■ offenders,terrorists for the “plebs” to hate.Meanwhile the “good guys” are getting away with murder.
Muckaway:
Bking you have excelled yourself this time for posting total ■■■■■■■■. How twisted are you, defending a [zb]’ actions?
I don’t think he has defended the actions of this pervert.
I’m sure you are fully aware of how the media works when they twist a tale to sell more newspapers.
I bet we could all be guilty at some stage of indecent exposure. (being caught short and having a pee somewhere).
The newspapers would say (pervert lorry drivers charged with indecent exposure).
In other words, You need to look at all the facts, Not just what is reported.
Muckaway:
Bking you have excelled yourself this time for posting total ■■■■■■■■. How twisted are you, defending a [zb]’ actions?
Read the statment S L O W L Y you know like how you read the letters page when you buy the super soar away sun then you might get the gist!
I aint defending no kiddy fiddler but I sure as hell dont believe all the “facts” the likes of rupert bloody murdoch or the rest of the “media” ■■■■■■■■■ artists feed me either.
Muckaway:
Bking you have excelled yourself this time for posting total ■■■■■■■■. How twisted are you, defending a [zb]’ actions?
I don’t think he has defended the actions of this pervert.
I’m sure you are fully aware of how the media works when they twist a tale to sell more newspapers.
I bet we could all be guilty at some stage of indecent exposure. (being caught short and having a pee somewhere).
The newspapers would say (pervert lorry drivers charged with indecent exposure).
In other words, You need to look at all the facts, Not just what is reported.
An instance few years ago got bloody bladder cancer,had it cut out and the doctor told me that for a few days when you feel the need for a wee you got approx 1 minute due to stretching of the muscles where they operated.Got out and told all was clear.
Went for a beer to “celebrate” Came out the lusher walking down the road and did I need a pee.
Down a back alley and plod passed in a van.Next thing Im in skem nick looking at 80 quid fine for urinating in a public place.
Not all thing are “as they seem” or black and white.
Throw the feckinn key away. I did jury service for a kiddy fiddler case and the victims were too young to be in court but the it was not pleasant seeing what their parents were put through by the defence barrister
Silver_Surfer:
I’m surprised the police didn’t let you off after you explained about the cancer Bking. Better to pee in an alley than wet yourself involuntarily.
The funny or not so funny thing is they probly wouldn’t have fined you if you’d have just wet yourself.
The [zb] should have got life.
You ever had “dealings” with your local constabulary?
I still had the wrist band from the hospital on,and my wife and 4 friends to verify my statement.
Still ended up cuffed and in the back of the meat van.
Lot of people think its all that"police ,camera,action" bollox
Believe a tenth of what you see and none of what you hear!
