THE PDU-UK "Q&A"

Newmercman, I don’t blame you :wink: that was his very first post, and he asked for questions. He got them, but then I got ■■■■■■ off because he wouldn’t answer them, so I kept at him. It wasn’t “bullying”, it wasn’t “mob mentality”, and it certainly wasn’t concerted. I was trying to get honest answers (as were others), and all I got was insults, and now he’s blocked me.
I hope he doesn’t think that means that nobody else can see my posts :wink:

jprioredi:
I know that technically this is no longer a Q&A, but before this gets locked, can I ask a serious question?

I know you’ve stated that you won’t reveal membership numbers “for good reason”, and if I’ve understood this right it’s because you don’t want anyone you may be involved in discussions with knowing these numbers?

However, if I sign up - pay my £5 - I can obtain these numbers?

What’s to stop those you don’t want knowing paying a fiver and finding out?

Do you carry out background checks, ask for proof of employment, dcpc numbers, or am I missing something here?

Yes, members can see how many are in the unity
It would be hoped those joining want the PDU to succeed and so help it.

I “request” they do not release the numbers and the reason why, if anyone was so low then not much I can do about it, it is called trust

newmercman:
My advice to you Barry, go and do your thing, make a difference and come back and say I told you so, then maybe the people against you just for the sake of it may have a change of heart.

Actions speak louder than words…

Ahem

Successes:

Failures:
Truckers Moan,- campaigning organisation- failed rebranded as TruckersWorld
TruckersWorld - campaigning organisation - Failed withdrew from campaigning- now a barren website with next to no usage
PDU-UK (£25 subs) - failed not enough people believed in it
Drivers National Conference - Failed never took place
Driver Protest March - Failed never happened
NOK cards- failed another group provided them for free
Theft text alert - failed no organisation would back it the DFT has serious reservations about LGV drivers receiving texts when driving
Truckers Club - failed- Barry claims it is a success, if so why isn’t it still running, fact is it never covered its costs
and my favourite the £100 DCPC- failed due to his figures simply not adding up and it being totally impossible to achieve

Mike-C:

raymundo:
This whole thread is now boring and very repetitive and I wish I could ignore it and go watch paint dry, but I keep coming back to it :frowning:

Its all because people like you won’t pay five pounds and support Unity for truckers. You think we’d be having this conversation if we had 200 in the Unity ?

I do support truckers in their quest for decent conditions etc, but I aint going to pay £5 to someone when it would not benefit me one little bit. Would rather give a tenner to the cat protection league … and I hate cats !!

Barrie Tozer:

Mike-C:

Barrie Tozer:
Do you honestly think I would still be going after 14 years if things were not legal and accounted

With just the amount of back stabbers on here I would have been in trouble before now.

Some of us do checks and ensure things are in place first

Yes i do honestly think that. And i’ll tell you why, you’ve come here to rebuff claims of “its your pension pot” and you havn’t rebuffed them at all. All you’ve said is there’s no need for accounts. There is no such thing as “no need for accounts”.

Wrong again

I have said there is no need to produce accounts to all the hounds who have been asking on here

Barrie, why do you do this to yourself. You tell me what you said here, 1st page…

I’m reading “no requirement for accounting”. I also know that aside from there is a requirement for accounting, there is a requirement for “submitting”. But we still come back to the fact that to counter accusation of “its your pension pot”, your answer is …there is no need to produce accounts, to anyone. yes or no will do.

newmercman:
My advice to you Barry, go and do your thing, make a difference and come back and say I told you so, then maybe the people against you just for the sake of it may have a change of heart.

Actions speak louder than words…

Actions are already in hand.
Unlike our unions the PDU will act not just talk.

never guarantee a success but at least we will try and members are doing their bit to take it forward

newmercman:
My advice to you Barry, go and do your thing, make a difference and come back and say I told you so, then maybe the people against you just for the sake of it may have a change of heart.

Actions speak louder than words…

You win the Internet! Most sensible post of the lot - you should have saved that for the 1000th post :slight_smile:

I’m feeling sorry for Rikki in all this! I’ve got a mental image of him hunched over his keypad staring through bloodshot eyes saying “FFS I’ve not bloody slept since Saturday 'cos of having to babysit this sodding thread, I have better bloody things to do you know!” :smiley: :smiley:

Mike-C:

Barrie Tozer:

Mike-C:

Barrie Tozer:
Do you honestly think I would still be going after 14 years if things were not legal and accounted

With just the amount of back stabbers on here I would have been in trouble before now.

Some of us do checks and ensure things are in place first

Yes i do honestly think that. And i’ll tell you why, you’ve come here to rebuff claims of “its your pension pot” and you havn’t rebuffed them at all. All you’ve said is there’s no need for accounts. There is no such thing as “no need for accounts”.

Wrong again

I have said there is no need to produce accounts to all the hounds who have been asking on here

Barrie, why do you do this to yourself. You tell me what you said here, 1st page…
0

I’m reading “no requirement for accounting”. I also know that aside from there is a requirement for accounting, there is a requirement for “submitting”. But we still come back to the fact that to counter accusation of “its your pension pot”, your answer is …there is no need to produce accounts, to anyone. yes or no will do.

The problem is just like this post you cannot or do not want to read post in answer
I answer one person, do I need to repeat it to every single hound that cannot be bothered to look first

raymundo:

Mike-C:

raymundo:
This whole thread is now boring and very repetitive and I wish I could ignore it and go watch paint dry, but I keep coming back to it :frowning:

Its all because people like you won’t pay five pounds and support Unity for truckers. You think we’d be having this conversation if we had 200 in the Unity ?

I do support truckers in their quest for decent conditions etc, but I aint going to pay £5 to someone when it would not benefit me one little bit. Would rather give a tenner to the cat protection league … and I hate cats !!

My fiver is going to the Rabbit Society.

FH12guy:

newmercman:
My advice to you Barry, go and do your thing, make a difference and come back and say I told you so, then maybe the people against you just for the sake of it may have a change of heart.

Actions speak louder than words…

Ahem

Successes:

Failures:
Truckers Moan,- campaigning organisation- failed rebranded as TruckersWorld
TruckersWorld - campaigning organisation - Failed withdrew from campaigning- now a barren website with next to no usage
PDU-UK (£25 subs) - failed not enough people believed in it
Drivers National Conference - Failed never took place
Driver Protest March - Failed never happened
NOK cards- failed another group provided them for free
Theft text alert - failed no organisation would back it the DFT has serious reservations about LGV drivers receiving texts when driving
Truckers Club - failed- Barry claims it is a success, if so why isn’t it still running, fact is it never covered its costs
and my favourite the £100 DCPC- failed due to his figures simply not adding up and it being totally impossible to achieve

You have to let the hounds have some false fact to keep the barrage going :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

the maoster:
I’m feeling sorry for Rikki in all this! I’ve got a mental image of him hunched over his keypad staring through bloodshot eyes saying “FFS I’ve not bloody slept since Saturday 'cos of having to babysit this sodding thread, I have better bloody things to do you know!” :smiley: :smiley:

Bless you :slight_smile: they pay me to deal with this crap :slight_smile: so its not all bad… a few beers up the social club also help to numb the pain

Thank Christ Carryfast hasn’t noticed this thread, if you think 34 pages is bad, nobody bring Thatcher into this …ffs.! :smiley:

Bed Time

Keep the insults and false accusations coming while I am not here to answer

You might deter some more with your aims.

Sorry to keep you up Rikki
you might have another 5 hours to go because none of them will give in until they win

They won’t :laughing:

Barrie Tozer:

FH12guy:

newmercman:
My advice to you Barry, go and do your thing, make a difference and come back and say I told you so, then maybe the people against you just for the sake of it may have a change of heart.

Actions speak louder than words…

Ahem

Successes:

Failures:
Truckers Moan,- campaigning organisation- failed rebranded as TruckersWorld
TruckersWorld - campaigning organisation - Failed withdrew from campaigning- now a barren website with next to no usage
PDU-UK (£25 subs) - failed not enough people believed in it
Drivers National Conference - Failed never took place
Driver Protest March - Failed never happened
NOK cards- failed another group provided them for free
Theft text alert - failed no organisation would back it the DFT has serious reservations about LGV drivers receiving texts when driving
Truckers Club - failed- Barry claims it is a success, if so why isn’t it still running, fact is it never covered its costs
and my favourite the £100 DCPC- failed due to his figures simply not adding up and it being totally impossible to achieve

You have to let the hounds have some false fact to keep the barrage going :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Which ones are false Barry?,

Lets be honest - do you agree these are all your projects that you, Barry Tozer have created and promoted? I haven’t just plucked them out of thin air? - they all have undoubtably failed as none exist any more or are not functioning in any meaningful way .I have asked you a number of times to tell us why these failed and who is too blame, but you seem to be avoiding the question. so please if you disagree, one by one of the above projects of yours, which succeeded and are still going strong, and which ones died a death, why did they die and whose fault was it? Now is your chance to show that you have as you said “learnt by your mistakes”

Barrie Tozer:

Mike-C:

Barrie Tozer:
Wrong again

I have said there is no need to produce accounts to all the hounds who have been asking on here

Barrie, why do you do this to yourself. You tell me what you said here, 1st page…
0

I’m reading “no requirement for accounting”. I also know that aside from there is a requirement for accounting, there is a requirement for “submitting”. But we still come back to the fact that to counter accusation of “its your pension pot”, your answer is …there is no need to produce accounts, to anyone. yes or no will do.

The problem is just like this post you cannot or do not want to read post in answer
I answer one person, do I need to repeat it to every single hound that cannot be bothered to look first

Ok , lets not get hung up on a sticking point then, lets move on. Changing the structure and plan from no one on a wage of more than 35K, and lobbyists to get expenses. I understand that was with planned subscriptions of £25, so to radically change to a subscription of £5 and no wages for anyone, or no expenses either ? ,not sure if that point has been clarified, but any how thats a radical upheaval and shift in plan. Can you talk us through it a little bit just what these changes have meant, been, implemented ? Or in other words, just explain the practial changes it has meant having a vastly reduced subscription?

robroy:
Thank Christ Carryfast hasn’t noticed this thread, if you think 34 pages is bad, nobody bring Thatcher into this …ffs.! :smiley:

You know I find it really really strange that there is no Carryfast on this thread. Argumentative, arrogant (reminding you of anyone) know all Carryfast…

Mike-C:

raymundo:

Mike-C:

raymundo:
This whole thread is now boring and very repetitive and I wish I could ignore it and go watch paint dry, but I keep coming back to it :frowning:

Its all because people like you won’t pay five pounds and support Unity for truckers. You think we’d be having this conversation if we had 200 in the Unity ?

I do support truckers in their quest for decent conditions etc, but I aint going to pay £5 to someone when it would not benefit me one little bit. Would rather give a tenner to the cat protection league … and I hate cats !!

My fiver is going to the Rabbit Society.

You might want to check who runs that one first !!! :slight_smile:

And I know what you mean lol

Dont mind me, im just here distracting you all at the moment for the next post