The Army - the tories industrial boot boys!

green456:
I hope the tanker drivers get well and truly stuffed, because they helped MAGGIES govt to screw the miners by breaking their picket lines to deliver gas oil to power stations when the miners had the guts to stand up and be counted for 12 months. Was a case of I am all right jack :imp:

I agree in theory. My Dad was out on the Miners strike because he worked for the Coalboard, I was about 7. However, how many of these drivers now were working on the tankers then? That was 26 years ago.
That’s like when some of the Irish still blame all of the Para’s for Bloody Sunday when most of them weren’t born.

no one has claimed that it has nothing to do with money!

Unite the Union has, to quote their spokes person:

Commenting Diana Holland, Unite assistant general secretary, said: “These votes send a clear message throughout the industry and should prompt all the major companies to get around the table to establish minimum standards.

This is not about pay - this is about ensuring that high safety and training standards are maintained, so that our communities are safe. It is about a simple measure, the creation of an industry-wide bargaining forum. It is about bringing fairness and stability back to an essential national industry.”

“No longer can it be acceptable that oil giants rake in profits, while shirking their responsibility for the stable supply of a national commodity. The measures we are proposing are reasonable, responsible and sensible. We urge them to act and listen.”

del949:

So what are they striking about then if it got nothing to do with money

?

no one has claimed that it has nothing to do with money!
what has been claimed (I thought it was fairly obvious) is that it is not about increasing their money but simply maintaining their present money, and conditions.
On here, page after page, thread after thread of drivers complaining that the job pays less and less, every time there is a contract changeover the profit margin is reduced leading to reductions in drivers wages and yet when some drivers do what all others complain never happens, other drivers complain about it!
What would you rather happen?
Should they rollover and accept the pay cuts, giving other hauliers the incentive to do the same or should they fight and give other drivers the same incentive.
Make no mistake, other large hauliers are watching with interest to see if the fuel companies can get away with it and if they do you can be certain that it won’t be long before someone else tries the same.
present pay rises (the few that there are) are almost all below the level of inflation leading in real terms to wage cuts, surely there is a time when you say “enough is enough”?

As for the tories caring what the trade unions say or do, they won’t …until the workers stand up for themselves en mass… then they will want to use the army and police to fight back.
They are already gearing up for this, in the latest gov’t policy on regional pay it is formulated that that all public sector workers, teachers doctors etc etc will ALL be affected by wage cuts… except the police!
So whilst the govt may in public claim to be not affected by unions they are certainly concerned about workers reactions and are prepared to treat the police as a special case in order to keep them on side.

Dear oh dear.

Without wanting to patronise you Del, I like a lot of your posts on these forums, but you and some others really need to get your facts correct here.

This industrial action by these drivers is not about cut backs or reductions in money at all, it’s about the apparent “cutting of corners” when it comes to Health & Safety and the proposed future reduction in training of drivers. Yes, it’s a money issue, a cost cutting exercise for the Fuel/Oil companies, but it won’t affect the drivers’ wages right now.

Without wanting to digress too much - personally, I think the public sector workers that work for the government agencies (Job Centre Plus) and councils etc, have been overstaffed and in many cases overpaid for far too long now.
Walk into any council building or job centre and you’ll see more staff than punters - and that’s really saying something in these times of high unemployment and hardship. My youngest daughter is currently unemployed. She’s desperate to get back to work; and whilst she may need her dole money, she dreads going in to sign on every two weeks due to being kept waiting for up to an hour whilst job centre staff stand about in groups, chatting, joking and laughing. And then when they do deal with her, they are frequently incompetent and disorganised. It’s funny that, cause’ the Jobcentre staff were of the same breed when I went to sign on as a school leaver aged 17 back in 1978 under the Callaghan Labour government! Thankfully back then I was only unemployed for two months - my daughter has been out of work for over a year now.
I don’t agree with the way this government is messing with peoples pensions, but cut backs in the numbers of staff has been on the cards - quite rightly - for years and years.

And then there’s the Police. This goverment is proposing plans to change the pay structure of Police in England and Wales to a bonus related pay scheme. It’s already not going down well at all with the various Police federations who now want the right to strike. Mmm…wonder what a lot of the anti-police brigade (and pro-police) on here will think about that.

And then there’s the Unions and drivers. I have always been in favour of unions in the haulage industry. I was a shop steward myself for a number of years when working as a driver for a well known international oil company based here in Scotland. I’m not arrogant but proud to say I never lost a case involving the unfair treatment of drivers - and there were many instances!
I also, “on behalf” of the then TGWU who represented us, balloted the drivers on three occasions for strike action due to the company blatently and seriously abusing Health & Safety regulations. We refused to drive all vehicles on the first strike action, and subsequently actual strike action was not required on the further two ballots.
You have to fight these companies, and you have to fight them together with a Union, to win. Plain and simple!

However, then there’s Unite. Don’t anyone be under any illusion that they are interested in Drivers beyond the tanker drivers, because they’re not. This is Unite’s big chance at the limelight and they’re grabbing it with both hands…but what will they and there members do when the army are brought in?
I hate Cameron with a passion, but it’s a shrewd move to use the British Army. After all, who’s going to be the first to abuse the troops when they drive through a picket line? In my opinion nobody should blame the Army - they will simply be following orders.

Back on Unite. Gotta laugh! Correct me if I’m wrong, but this is the union that recently balloted all Scotrail train drivers to go on strike after one of their colleagues - a senior driver on 51k a year - was demoted to a more junior rank of driver on 32k a year (!) for calling in sick for a week, when in fact he admitted he’d been in Germany following his football team of choice!

But Unite, despite this ridiculous and laughable set of circumstances (many haulage companies would sack a driver outright for the same thing!) are going ahead with the ballot and subsequent action unless the driver is reinstated to his senior position on 51k a year! Now that’s just taking the pish!

No wonder so many people laugh off Unions.

I say best of luck to the tanker drivers (because they’re right on this occasion), and it will be interesting to see how it all turns out.

I have read MOST of this thread,so apologise if this has already been posted.

Bikemonkey:
I have read MOST of this thread,so apologise if this has already been posted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZidpiFbnTI&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Nice bit of propaganda by Unite including some crashes involving lorries and Bunsfield. Scaremongering or what :unamused:

So - as per the clip - these tanker drivers are asked to drive more hours. I take it they are not going to be asked to drive more than they legally can as per the Tacho regulations. If it is good enough for the general haulage drivers to do these driving hours, why shouldn’t it be for these tanker drivers?

There is always ineffeciency and I don’t blame Companies trying to be more efficient. I think that this is what it is all about. These drivers are asked to be more efficient and they don’t like it. God forbid, they may have to do an honest day work for a change.

interlog:

Bikemonkey:
I have read MOST of this thread,so apologise if this has already been posted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZidpiFbnTI&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Nice bit of propaganda by Unite including some crashes involving lorries and Bunsfield. Scaremongering or what :unamused:

So - as per the clip - these tanker drivers are asked to drive more hours. I take it they are not going to be asked to drive more than they legally can as per the Tacho regulations. If it is good enough for the general haulage drivers to do these driving hours, why shouldn’t it be for these tanker drivers?

There is always ineffeciency and I don’t blame Companies trying to be more efficient. I think that this is what it is all about. These drivers are asked to be more efficient and they don’t like it. God forbid, they may have to do an honest day work for a change.

+1 long as all legal whats the problem??

taffytrucker:

interlog:

Bikemonkey:
I have read MOST of this thread,so apologise if this has already been posted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZidpiFbnTI&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Nice bit of propaganda by Unite including some crashes involving lorries and Bunsfield. Scaremongering or what :unamused:

So - as per the clip - these tanker drivers are asked to drive more hours. I take it they are not going to be asked to drive more than they legally can as per the Tacho regulations. If it is good enough for the general haulage drivers to do these driving hours, why shouldn’t it be for these tanker drivers?

There is always ineffeciency and I don’t blame Companies trying to be more efficient. I think that this is what it is all about. These drivers are asked to be more efficient and they don’t like it. God forbid, they may have to do an honest day work for a change.

+1 long as all legal whats the problem??

+2
I wish I was on 45k per year to duck and dive work like fuel tanker drivers do, they only get into the vehicle 3 times in a shift, first to put their sandwich box in, second to defect the wagon cos the indicator is only flashing 100 times a minute instead of 101, and third time to retrieve sarnies before sitting in canteen, fitter arrives, cant fault motor but driver dont have enough hours to complete work allocated, result for driver,
Idle gits

green456:

taffytrucker:

interlog:

Bikemonkey:
I have read MOST of this thread,so apologise if this has already been posted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZidpiFbnTI&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Nice bit of propaganda by Unite including some crashes involving lorries and Bunsfield. Scaremongering or what :unamused:

So - as per the clip - these tanker drivers are asked to drive more hours. I take it they are not going to be asked to drive more than they legally can as per the Tacho regulations. If it is good enough for the general haulage drivers to do these driving hours, why shouldn’t it be for these tanker drivers?

There is always ineffeciency and I don’t blame Companies trying to be more efficient. I think that this is what it is all about. These drivers are asked to be more efficient and they don’t like it. God forbid, they may have to do an honest day work for a change.

+1 long as all legal whats the problem??

+2
I wish I was on 45k per year to duck and dive work like fuel tanker drivers do, they only get into the vehicle 3 times in a shift, first to put their sandwich box in, second to defect the wagon cos the indicator is only flashing 100 times a minute instead of 101, and third time to retrieve sarnies before sitting in canteen, fitter arrives, cant fault motor but driver dont have enough hours to complete work allocated, result for driver,
Idle gits

Yeah blokes on £45k jobs always behave like that, thick as two planks the lot of 'em, that’s why they managed to get jobs like that in the first place…chimps could do better… :unamused: :unamused: :unamused:

We should be more like the French :wink:

Dominique Strauss-Kahn has been placed under formal investigation for alleged involvement in a luxury prostitution ring operating out of Lille, northern France.

Former political allies of disgraced ex-IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn tried to distance themselves on Tuesday after he was charged with pimping.

“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.”

ANDY1961:

del949:

So what are they striking about then if it got nothing to do with money

?

no one has claimed that it has nothing to do with money!
what has been claimed (I thought it was fairly obvious) is that it is not about increasing their money but simply maintaining their present money, and conditions.
On here, page after page, thread after thread of drivers complaining that the job pays less and less, every time there is a contract changeover the profit margin is reduced leading to reductions in drivers wages and yet when some drivers do what all others complain never happens, other drivers complain about it!
What would you rather happen?
Should they rollover and accept the pay cuts, giving other hauliers the incentive to do the same or should they fight and give other drivers the same incentive.
Make no mistake, other large hauliers are watching with interest to see if the fuel companies can get away with it and if they do you can be certain that it won’t be long before someone else tries the same.
present pay rises (the few that there are) are almost all below the level of inflation leading in real terms to wage cuts, surely there is a time when you say “enough is enough”?

As for the tories caring what the trade unions say or do, they won’t …until the workers stand up for themselves en mass… then they will want to use the army and police to fight back.
They are already gearing up for this, in the latest gov’t policy on regional pay it is formulated that that all public sector workers, teachers doctors etc etc will ALL be affected by wage cuts… except the police!
So whilst the govt may in public claim to be not affected by unions they are certainly concerned about workers reactions and are prepared to treat the police as a special case in order to keep them on side.

Dear oh dear.

Without wanting to patronise you Del, I like a lot of your posts on these forums, but you and some others really need to get your facts correct here.

This industrial action by these drivers is not about cut backs or reductions in money at all, it’s about the apparent “cutting of corners” when it comes to Health & Safety and the proposed future reduction in training of drivers. Yes, it’s a money issue, a cost cutting exercise for the Fuel/Oil companies, but it won’t affect the drivers’ wages right now.

Without wanting to digress too much - personally, I think the public sector workers that work for the government agencies (Job Centre Plus) and councils etc, have been overstaffed and in many cases overpaid for far too long now.
Walk into any council building or job centre and you’ll see more staff than punters - and that’s really saying something in these times of high unemployment and hardship. My youngest daughter is currently unemployed. She’s desperate to get back to work; and whilst she may need her dole money, she dreads going in to sign on every two weeks due to being kept waiting for up to an hour whilst job centre staff stand about in groups, chatting, joking and laughing. And then when they do deal with her, they are frequently incompetent and disorganised. It’s funny that, cause’ the Jobcentre staff were of the same breed when I went to sign on as a school leaver aged 17 back in 1978 under the Callaghan Labour government! Thankfully back then I was only unemployed for two months - my daughter has been out of work for over a year now.
I don’t agree with the way this government is messing with peoples pensions, but cut backs in the numbers of staff has been on the cards - quite rightly - for years and years.

And then there’s the Police. This goverment is proposing plans to change the pay structure of Police in England and Wales to a bonus related pay scheme. It’s already not going down well at all with the various Police federations who now want the right to strike. Mmm…wonder what a lot of the anti-police brigade (and pro-police) on here will think about that.

And then there’s the Unions and drivers. I have always been in favour of unions in the haulage industry. I was a shop steward myself for a number of years when working as a driver for a well known international oil company based here in Scotland. I’m not arrogant but proud to say I never lost a case involving the unfair treatment of drivers - and there were many instances!
I also, “on behalf” of the then TGWU who represented us, balloted the drivers on three occasions for strike action due to the company blatently and seriously abusing Health & Safety regulations. We refused to drive all vehicles on the first strike action, and subsequently actual strike action was not required on the further two ballots.
You have to fight these companies, and you have to fight them together with a Union, to win. Plain and simple!

However, then there’s Unite. Don’t anyone be under any illusion that they are interested in Drivers beyond the tanker drivers, because they’re not. This is Unite’s big chance at the limelight and they’re grabbing it with both hands…but what will they and there members do when the army are brought in?
I hate Cameron with a passion, but it’s a shrewd move to use the British Army. After all, who’s going to be the first to abuse the troops when they drive through a picket line? In my opinion nobody should blame the Army - they will simply be following orders.

Back on Unite. Gotta laugh! Correct me if I’m wrong, but this is the union that recently balloted all Scotrail train drivers to go on strike after one of their colleagues - a senior driver on 51k a year - was demoted to a more junior rank of driver on 32k a year (!) for calling in sick for a week, when in fact he admitted he’d been in Germany following his football team of choice!

But Unite, despite this ridiculous and laughable set of circumstances (many haulage companies would sack a driver outright for the same thing!) are going ahead with the ballot and subsequent action unless the driver is reinstated to his senior position on 51k a year! Now that’s just taking the pish!

No wonder so many people laugh off Unions.

I say best of luck to the tanker drivers (because they’re right on this occasion), and it will be interesting to see how it all turns out.

If it comes to a showdown between Unite and the establishment it will probably turn out the same as all the other failed Union actions since Thatcher’s policies sent the country back to the 1920’s.If it’s a case of the army being involved (in whatever form) v workers the army will win,just as the police won during the miners strike and the strikers are just wasting their time and wages.

Take away all the bs about Afghanistan in which the Army,as usual,are just following the same suicidal orders as Russian conscripts did during the pre Yeltsin era,without question (there’s nothing heroic about that),what are you left with :question: .

Which brings us back to the original question raised by the OP.The unions are wasting their time in trying to improve things when the country is effectively under martial law in one form or another,under force of unquestioning army/police,and that issue will need to be dealt with before they stand any chance whatsoever of being able to return the economy,and their members’ ability to bargain,to where things stood during the 1960’s and the pre Thatcher years.

The UK economy,as it stands at present,shows all the signs and results of being in the situation of being run by a dictatorship for the benefit of the government’s chosen few cronies dependent on their ability to buy influence and power at the highest levels. :imp:

Wheel Nut:
We should be more like the French :wink:

Dominique Strauss-Kahn has been placed under formal investigation for alleged involvement in a luxury prostitution ring operating out of Lille, northern France.

Former political allies of disgraced ex-IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn tried to distance themselves on Tuesday after he was charged with pimping.

“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.”

The British establishment seems to prefer the Communist Party way and it all depends on the definition of ‘great’.

As someone who has been in all three of the jobs under discussion with 23 years in the forces, 18 years on oil rigs in the north sea as both a company employee and then a contractor, and the last 11 as a driver with adr I can see many of the arguments BUT.
The tanker drivers are on the money they are because oil companies paid considerably higher rates than other hauliers, so when the operating companies, in my case Conoco, decided to outsource the delivery of fuel they insisted that the drivers moving to the new company and by inference their colleagues, had to stay on the same pay. So they started further up the ladder and now want to stay rungs above, no matter what is going on beneath.

If the services are called in to deliver, what makes anyone think, particularly the half wits in that union ad on you tube, that the job will be done less safely.? Who do you thing delivers fuel to the aircraft and vehicles operated by the three services, not just the Army?
The fuel used in the starting cartridges for helicopters was hand carried in gallon containers as the expansion factor was that high.

Delivering fuel is no more dangerous than delivering chemicals, explosives or any other hazardous substance, it is just more in the publlic eye.

Vascoingles:

gnasty gnome:
What peeves a lot of people (with a certain element of justification) is that those same unions who’ll do anything for fuel tanker drivers won’t get out of bed for blokes on general haulage, or shop floor workers in a biscuit factory; for the simple reason that they know that it carries no chance of making mischief for the government.

at last someone has turned the light on

Wrong.

Totally wrong.

The reason the unions are reluctant to help blokes on general or shop floor workers is much simpler…through bitter experience they know that those workers will not stick together to fight for their common good. They will sell each other down the river for an extra 50p an hr…so they unions have learnt it isn’t worth the effort and expense to fight for those who are not willing to fight for themselves!

DonutUK:

Vascoingles:

gnasty gnome:
What peeves a lot of people (with a certain element of justification) is that those same unions who’ll do anything for fuel tanker drivers won’t get out of bed for blokes on general haulage, or shop floor workers in a biscuit factory; for the simple reason that they know that it carries no chance of making mischief for the government.

at last someone has turned the light on

Wrong.

Totally wrong.

The reason the unions are reluctant to help blokes on general or shop floor workers is much simpler…through bitter experience they know that those workers will not stick together to fight for their common good. They will sell each other down the river for an extra 50p an hr…so they unions have learnt it isn’t worth the effort and expense to fight for those who are not willing to fight for themselves!

Ironically though,even with that issue,the government still decided to introduce secondary action laws which seems to suggest that the government were scared enough of the potential amounts of membership support as it stood at that time.While it’s equally ironic that the TUC didn’t see enough support to call a general strike to defend the right of union members to strike in support of each other in different industries.

I think the problem has been more one of continuous establishment anti union propaganda just before and since Thatcher’s election and the country’s workforce being stupid enough to swallow it all hook line and sinker.

bigdennis:
As someone who has been in all three of the jobs under discussion with 23 years in the forces, 18 years on oil rigs in the north sea as both a company employee and then a contractor, and the last 11 as a driver with adr I can see many of the arguments BUT.
The tanker drivers are on the money they are because oil companies paid considerably higher rates than other hauliers, so when the operating companies, in my case Conoco, decided to outsource the delivery of fuel they insisted that the drivers moving to the new company and by inference their colleagues, had to stay on the same pay. So they started further up the ladder and now want to stay rungs above, no matter what is going on beneath.

If the services are called in to deliver, what makes anyone think, particularly the half wits in that union ad on you tube, that the job will be done less safely.? Who do you thing delivers fuel to the aircraft and vehicles operated by the three services, not just the Army?
The fuel used in the starting cartridges for helicopters was hand carried in gallon containers as the expansion factor was that high.

Delivering fuel is no more dangerous than delivering chemicals, explosives or any other hazardous substance, it is just more in the publlic eye.

It’s a pity this post didn’t come along before some of the others; thanks for the insight Dennis.

Andy 1961, I agree that I could have been a bit clearer in what I was trying to get across, put it down to arguing with the green eyed monster infected people who have been posting remarks about them seeking a pay rise.

In general though, as I understand the dispute, it isn’t just about health, safety and training. Hours worked are included in the dispute and consquently an increase in hours worked without corresponding increase in pay is a wage cut, ditto changes to their pensions should be viewed in the same way. So therefore it IS partly about money, albeit not directly.
At the time I had posted my comment I had not seen the bulletin by Dianne Abbott and after reading it am not convinced that she is being 100%accurate.

In my opinion the tanker drivers have already lost.
Listening to a phone in today the public are already turning against them just at the thought of a fuel strike.
People like their cars that’s why they’ve allowed fuel prices to get higher.
Support in the industry won’t last once haulage,taxi and bus firms start laying people off with no wages some firms may never recover.
Regrdless of what the complaints are the public will struggle to see past £45k wages.
It’ll go the same way as he fire strike did (squaddies were Labour industrial boot boys back then) once people see a 19 year old kid doing the job they’ll wonder why their so highly paid.

There might have been a bit more sympathy if Mclusky hadn’t laid his cards on the table months ago when he called for strikes and civil unrest during the olympics.
Never mind all the tales of the military training drivers to deliver fuel as mentioned it’s bread and butter stuff to all three services.
They will find 1000 drivers without any trouble if required many of the lads will see it as a chance to get civvy driving experiance.

As to Thatcher who seems to apear on this thread over and over.
Are people aware we have had a Labour Goverment to which UNITE was one of it’s bigger contributors?
Jack Dromey husband of Harriet Harman is now an MP of the back of unites contributions to Labour.
In fact this year he had to apologise to the HoC over the fact he forgot to mention Unite had paid him £27,000.

They’re as all as bad as each other and no Goverment is going to be held hosatge by a union or 1000 drivers.

del949:
Andy 1961, I agree that I could have been a bit clearer in what I was trying to get across, put it down to arguing with the green eyed monster infected people who have been posting remarks about them seeking a pay rise.

In general though, as I understand the dispute, it isn’t just about health, safety and training. Hours worked are included in the dispute and consquently an increase in hours worked without corresponding increase in pay is a wage cut, ditto changes to their pensions should be viewed in the same way. So therefore it IS partly about money, albeit not directly.
At the time I had posted my comment I had not seen the bulletin by Dianne Abbott and after reading it am not convinced that she is being 100%accurate.

Hi Del - yes, you’re right - and I stand corrected - it is partly about money, albeit as you say, not directly. And amongst the haze of arguing with green eyed monster people, it’s understandable that any one of us might even start believing it’s all about money. Ha, ha…at least you took the time to read a lot of the posts! I started to lose the will to carry on after about page 2!

Sorry if I appeared rude to you.

I spoke to three Hoyer drivers down in Dumbarton yesterday evening. Two out of the three of them weren’t entirely sure what they may be striking over - and all three of them fear for their jobs. I’m pretty sure it was in the news yesterday that the majority of Hoyer drivers voted against strike action.

ANDY1961:

del949:
Andy 1961, I agree that I could have been a bit clearer in what I was trying to get across, put it down to arguing with the green eyed monster infected people who have been posting remarks about them seeking a pay rise.

In general though, as I understand the dispute, it isn’t just about health, safety and training. Hours worked are included in the dispute and consquently an increase in hours worked without corresponding increase in pay is a wage cut, ditto changes to their pensions should be viewed in the same way. So therefore it IS partly about money, albeit not directly.
At the time I had posted my comment I had not seen the bulletin by Dianne Abbott and after reading it am not convinced that she is being 100%accurate.

Hi Del - yes, you’re right - and I stand corrected - it is partly about money, albeit as you say, not directly. And amongst the haze of arguing with green eyed monster people, it’s understandable that any one of us might even start believing it’s all about money. Ha, ha…at least you took the time to read a lot of the posts! I started to lose the will to carry on after about page 2!

Sorry if I appeared rude to you.

I spoke to three Hoyer drivers down in Dumbarton yesterday evening. Two out of the three of them weren’t entirely sure what they may be striking over - and all three of them fear for their jobs. I’m pretty sure it was in the news yesterday that the majority of Hoyer drivers voted against strike action.

The fact is there’s no way that the union can win anyway in a union v army strike breaking confrontation in which case the TUC will just have to accept that it’s in a similar situation as it was in 1926 and just walk away and disband the union movement as a whole and let the government finish the job of taking the country and the economy back to those times. :imp:

If it comes to a showdown between Unite and the establishment it will probably turn out the same as all the other failed Union actions since Thatcher’s policies sent the country back to the 1920’s.If it’s a case of the army being involved (in whatever form) v workers the army will win,just as the police won during the miners strike and the strikers are just wasting their time and wages.

Take away all the bs about Afghanistan in which the Army,as usual,are just following the same suicidal orders as Russian conscripts did during the pre Yeltsin era,without question (there’s nothing heroic about that),what are you left with .

Which brings us back to the original question raised by the OP.The unions are wasting their time in trying to improve things when the country is effectively under martial law in one form or another,under force of unquestioning army/police,and that issue will need to be dealt with before they stand any chance whatsoever of being able to return the economy,and their members’ ability to bargain,to where things stood during the 1960’s and the pre Thatcher years.

The UK economy,as it stands at present,shows all the signs and results of being in the situation of being run by a dictatorship for the benefit of the government’s chosen few cronies dependent on their ability to buy influence and power at the highest levels.

The 1920’s? The miners strike? Russian conscripts before the Yeltsin era? What on earth has any of this got to do with the proposed industrial action by fuel drivers? (That’s a rhetorical question so please don’t bother answering it)

Martial law “in one form or another”? Martial law is martial law; it comes in one form, not any other - and there’s nothing vague about it! The British Army delivering fuel will not be martial law. It’s not martial law when they pick up bin bags or put out fires either - never has been!

Your comments about British forces “following suicidal orders without question” and the fact that you think “there’s nothing heroic about that”, shows how out of touch with actual reality you are. And quite frankly it’s downright silly and particularly offensive. No matter what these troops are asked to do, and regardless of what any of the population think, they took an oath for Queen and Country.