That’s fine, I just wanted to know, someone at work does that shift pattern and was asked to do a 15 last Sunday, he said he couldn’t but the planners and tachograph compliance said he can, so he did
A lot of us all thought it came under the ‘fixed week’.
NewLad:
That’s fine, I just wanted to know, someone at work does that shift pattern and was asked to do a 15 last Sunday, he said he couldn’t but the planners and tachograph compliance said he can, so he did
A lot of us all thought it came under the ‘fixed week’.
Thanks
Nope, only the 10 hour drives.
ROG will be along soon and show us how we can work 120 hours in a week. lol, its amazing what you CAN do within the rules.
You’ve already got the answer, you can legally have three reduced daily rest periods between two weekly rest periods.
So your planner is correct, as far as reduced daily rest periods are concerned a weekly rest or reduced weekly rest gives you another three reduced daily rest periods available before the next weekly rest period.
Tipper Tom:
If DCPC was what it should be then there would be no need for threads like this
I disagree actually Tom. New lad used a couple of pence of electricity and promptly received an answer to a question that quite frankly plenty of so called trainers would get wrong. He not only saved himself a day off with no pay he saved himself anywhere from £40 to £75 if the prices are to be believed.
My point was if DCPC was to actually be a valuable addition to our armoury. By that I mean if it was everything the government wanted it to be we wouldn’t need this thread.
I’m not suggesting the OP is wrong for asking and certainly not wrong for asking in favour of doing the ■■■■ poor excuse that is the current DCPC.
I simply meant that if a driver with any sense or even an old fashioned TM had designed DCPC it would eliminate the confusion and MMTM or even MTTM (My Trainer Told Me)
Tipper Tom:
My point was if DCPC was to actually be a valuable addition to our armoury. By that I mean if it was everything the government wanted it to be we wouldn’t need this thread.
I’m not suggesting the OP is wrong for asking and certainly not wrong for asking in favour of doing the ■■■■ poor excuse that is the current DCPC.
I simply meant that if a driver with any sense or even an old fashioned TM had designed DCPC it would eliminate the confusion and MMTM or even MTTM (My Trainer Told Me)
Would it not be better for those in government to print a handbook with all the legislation in searchable easy read format or a pdf for use on tablets, pc’s or smartphones and issued to all HGV/PCV drivers on completion of their test to when they are confused or stuck on an issue, it could even be subscribed to for updates …oh sorry there aint no money in that
I think I nearly thought then
Drift:
Would it not be better for those in government to print a handbook with all the legislation in searchable easy read format or a pdf for use on tablets, pc’s or smartphones and issued to all HGV/PCV drivers on completion of their test to when they are confused or stuck on an issue, it could even be subscribed to for updates …oh sorry there aint no money in that
I think I nearly thought then
There ain’t no money FOR that either. We spent it all on bankers and ■■■■ wit politicians.
■■■■■■■ brilliant idea though I can only think of one improvement. Why have it after the test and not part of it.
You can get all the rules online, the trouble is interpreting them, I was a coach driver for many years and then had a few years off, the hgv test hasn’t prepared me with all the information needed to know the answer to this question. I found dcpc very usefull on a couple of topics mainly because of the experience of the trainer but still there were questions they couldn’t answer, dcpc needs to be improved a lot but I think that the people that think its useless are already experienced in their own line of work and probably a bit stuck in their ways.
Loaf1:
You can get all the rules online, the trouble is interpreting them, I was a coach driver for many years and then had a few years off, the hgv test hasn’t prepared me with all the information needed to know the answer to this question. I found dcpc very usefull on a couple of topics mainly because of the experience of the trainer but still there were questions they couldn’t answer, dcpc needs to be improved a lot but I think that the people that think its useless are already experienced in their own line of work and probably a bit stuck in their ways.
The biggest problem isn’t the questions that some DCPC trainers cannot answer, it’s the questions they answer incorrectly that’s the biggest problem.
The reason a lot of us think the DCPC is useless is because in it’s current form it’s aimed more at making money than training.
It’s nothing to do with us being stuck in our ways, personally I think vocational training is a good thing, but using it merely to exploit working people is a bad thing
The DCPC is like many other things that have come out of our membership of the EU, a decent enough idea that’s been poorly thought out by people who’s first priority has little if anything to do with road transport.
Drift:
Would it not be better for those in government to print a handbook with all the legislation in searchable easy read format or a pdf for use on tablets, pc’s or smartphones and issued to all HGV/PCV drivers on completion of their test to when they are confused or stuck on an issue, it could even be subscribed to for updates …oh sorry there aint no money in that
I think I nearly thought then
The Tachodisc app is really useful. Gives the rules and regs in a simple, concise format. I think it’s free but can’t tell on my iPhone as it just says “installed”.