Unbelievable …he’s trying to excuse and dumb down the enormity of this present situation with official stats and percentages…but what else have we come to expect from this warped individual .
Because ‘mate’ it was Labour councillors who tried to hush up the cultural and racial aspect to keep their jobs and votes,.as disclosed by a ex LABOUR MP or councillor.
The main point with this is these animals got away with paedophilia, abuse and gang r4pe, they chose their victims BECAUSE they were white, underage and because of their cultural misogyny.
They got away with it on the whole because of pathetic people like yourself with your pathetic liberal views and apologistic attitudes.
Because due to the racial and religion aspect they were bound to be called racist…again by narrow minded servile people like yourself.
Instead of the authorities taking a hard line and treating people like yourself with the disdain and contempt you deserve, they took precedence on your pc views over the welfare of young vulnerable British girls…
So tell ya what mate, stick your official stats and figures right up there as far as you can.
Yep.
So if after the last enquiry (which was apparentlly a generic type enquiry under the heading of ‘general non specific child abuse’) nothing much was done.
At least now re.view it and concentrate wholly on this specific variety.
The fact that those making the most noise and protest about
having another enquiry are those that are more than likely guilty of incompetence and apathy should be enough to instigate this.
Heads should roll for all this, further hard line steps should be taken for similar occurences in the future, and priority and consideration towards the mamby pamby hand wringing views of the left and their labels of racism should be stopped.
I think this is further proof that you just take the opposing view on here as a point of default to try and win the argument, rather than the fact you actually believe what you are posting.
No…As opposed to facing up to what you and people like you are reluctatant to, …because you find it uncomfortable and contrary to what you are TOLD to believe
In favour of political party lines and official narratives, and at least actually coming out and condemning the present situation and all involved, the scum and the cover up culprits, instead of trying to find soething to excuse the inexcusable and accept the unacceptable.
I always find your views generally naive, amusing and puzzling for a man of your age and experience, on this specific occasion given the subject matter they are bordering on being disrespectful and offensive.
Oh no he sure as hell believes his views no mistake.
That is the actual tragedy of it.
Nobody could maintain the persona of a naive gullible idiot for this long.
the pure and blatant fact about all this as i have said before is starmer has pedo mates and time and time again he covers up for them… he was pally with savile and harris and strong ties to pie (pedo information exchange)
p.s why is the abreviation pedo allowed but the full word is banned
Hmmm not sure I’m with you on that one mate.
An implication and/or accusation of beinga paedo is worse than being labelled racist…that these lot thrive on.
(Both deserving the consequences of a potential post face to face meeting I could add.)
I dont think for one second that Starmer as bad as he is has any paedophilia connections or tendencies.
he lobbied for pie in the late 70’s/80’s The ■■■■■■■■■■ Information Exchange was affiliated to the National Council for Civil Liberties - now Liberty - in the late 1970s and early 1980s. But how did pro-■■■■■■■■■■ campaigners operate so openly?
Starmer served as a legal officer for the campaign group Liberty until 1990.
Half truths and total lies.
.
Starmer was a legal officer for Liberty.
He got his degree in 1985, and qualified as a Barrister in 1987. PIE was disbanded in 1983.
.
Legal Officers do not “lobby”. They give legal advice…the clue is in the name. [quote=“cooper1203, post:3941, topic:236118”]
he was pally with savile
[/quote]
Was he? https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/viral-image-keir-starmer-sitting-with-jimmy-savile-is-fake-2024-02-20/
Do you wish to look up Saville’s real mates?
There are lots of them. Including from other political parties. Thatcher lobbied for Saville’s knighthood, but she was one of many who were fooled by him.
Oh my! I am shocked and hurt.
I am so, so, sorry that you could have taken any form of offence at all.
You, who always tone down comments, rather than speak bluntly. You who never uses language that might in any way be deemed poor taste. You who would always avoid giving offence to anyone at all.
Shove your pseudo humility and your false apologies where the sun don’t shine mate, we both know you aint man enough for genuine apologies.
Not disrespectful to me btw…I don’t gaf about you tbh mate.
But disrespectful to those poor young girls who have suffered what is essentially sexual torture.
Disrespectful to the parents of those young girls, of whom I can personally relate to.
That guy in the vid deserves all the empathy and sympathy there is, for his self control and patience, sat waiting outside the premises of these gangs, knowing his little girl was in there ffs
I would have been uncontrollably hot headed if it had been me, stormed in there, and may have even ended up on a slab myself after …it does not bear thinking about what that guy went through…and is still going through, along with his little girl.
And what is your reaction to it?..the Forum pacifist lefty spokesman?
An apologist type statement for the Labour involvement.
The obligatory bile towards the Tories.
No condemnation towards the perpetrators…presumably because of race and religion…towing the party line as usual.
And the usual quoting of facts and figures in a ‘It aint that bad after all’ style.
You want blunt speaking?
You are an embarrasment and an absolute disgrace mate.
As I said earlier…Shame on you !
Even I did not think he could find something that could be viewed as some sort of defence or justification for all this, I just thought he would not respond and ignore it - a bit like he’s done for the vast majority of the last 6 months.
