Off Topic Carryfast Bollocks Split From Feedback Forum

Snudger:
Well, my own pathetic attempt at stirring was at least partially successful. CF, I was only conflating (I think) your statement regarding Southern States not following the national flag as not being patriotic and just pointed it out to tease you, not seriously considering them to be an insidious movement aimed at the overthrow of the Govt. I did think about whether I should raise the “war of Northern aggression” question before you did. That isn’t heard a lot especially as it’s invalid and as has been said before, it’s the winners who write history, though it’s interesting to speculate where history would’ve led us had the South won. 2 countries? I bet covert colour discrimination is still acceptable in the South. Of course any infighting people would unite against a greater common foe if they had any sense.

There’s another thing the Norse nutjob and Clarkson had in common and that is contempt of certain people’s desecration of their own flag, which may or may not be relevant here.

:question: :confused: .

I think my statement on which ‘national flag’ that many of the southern us states population still prefer to follow was clear enough and patriotism does’nt come much more patriotic than holding onto the same values and the flag that you fought under in a war against a federalist dictatorship and lost. :bulb:

What’s your reasoning as to why you think that the US Civil War was’nt a war of aggression by a fedaralist state against a Confederacy made up of sovereign states :question: .

In this case it’s a case of the winners have always ‘tried’ to write the history but without success because the losers won a moral victory which is worth more than what Lincoln acheived.

The question is’nt where history would’ve led us if the South had won.It’s more a question of wether the world would have been a better place if the North/Union had lost :question: .

I think that this topic and where American and British society is today answers at least some of that question. :bulb: :imp:

Fileep:

Carryfast:

switchlogic:

Carryfast:

switchlogic:
Carryfast, your rhetoric strikes me as very similar to the Norwegian nut case and many others like him. Your them and us mentality is pathetic and childish and it’s time you grew up a little.

I’m nothing like the Norwegian nutcase just like my Dad was’nt when he went out to stop a load of German nutters just like that raving Norwegian one.Guess where I got all my values from and thank god,although I have’nt been lucky enough to have a family as explained here,I was lucky enough not to be afflicted by the type of mental issues that affect those involved in same ■■■ relationships.

It’s an inconvenient truth for your lot that you don’t have to be a raving ■■■■ nutter to still have values and ideals that criminalise that type of mental illness.It’s just that those values don’t include the fanatical ideas of taking someone’s life just because of that problem.But that is’nt the same thing as saying that we should allow the lunatics to take over the asylum.

Oh look surprise surprise you brought up your dad again.

Absolutely because it’s those values which he had and the laws of the land that he supported which provides the inconvenient truth for your lot in that you don’t have to accept being branded as a raving ■■■■ sympathiser to support the criminalisation of perverted practices.

But I’m still waiting to see Fileep’s answers as to wether his age police storm troopers have gone round to Joe Philpot’s house yet to arrest him and to take his kids into care so as they can be handed over to a same ■■■ household for adoption. :imp: :unamused:

people.co.uk/news/uk-world-n … -18875458/

Seems to put into perspective Fileep’s idea to tell his daughter’s boyfriend to zb off just because he was ‘almost’ 21 :open_mouth: when she was 15.But don’t see any sign of the age police being sent out in this case yet :question:

My answer is…you believe everything you read, its all true in the papers! She admits to keeping the relationship quiet, Why? Dad left her, mother not bothered, obviouslt wanting a decrepit father figure.
Stop trying to use facts that you know [zb] all about, just because you read it in the paper doesn’t make it true. Look at the news today, papers getting fined for printing ■■■■■■■■. I really do think that you have a problem, you keep harping back to your father, and wanting to have a child bride. It is typical for the abused to become abusers!!!

:open_mouth: If the papers have got that wrong then none of it really happened.Which all seems to contradict the fact that they also appeared on TV in an interview in which they both confirmed those facts. :unamused:

I suppose you’re now also going to say that the relationships between Josephine Burge and Oliver reed and Clive and Jess Richards and those ones that I know of were all just fiction made up by newspapers too.

But yeah right.The fact that someone who seems to be saying would be happier to see his daughter in a lesbian relationship with a woman of her own age than a normal male/female one with a bloke 5 years older than her is trying to say that my mum was a victim of ‘abuse’ because she started going out with my,adult,over 21,dad when she was an under 21 so called ‘child’,says everything about your zb’d up pc view of the world.

By the way fathers and daughters can’t marry and have a family unlike husbands and wives.If a girl is looking for someone to be her father she would’nt want to marry him and have his kids unless she’s got some sick zb’d up ideas concerning relationships and why would anyone even think in the way that you obviously do on that issue :question: and how is it that you now seem to have also jumped to some so called ‘problem’ and abused/abuser type of conclusion just based on anything which I’ve said here about my own family. :imp: :unamused:

But your comments are the typical type of bs that anyone,who does’nt agree with the direction that the sicko pc zb’s are taking society in,has heard plenty of times before.

But if what you’re saying,about women being married at,or under, the age of 18 being a form of so called ‘abuse’,is correct,then the church and the law obviously would’nt allow marriage under the age of 18 with parents permission,or at the age of 18 without, because if it was the case,as you seem to think, that it was so called ‘abuse’ then everyone involved would be arrested. :bulb: :unamused:

Maybe in your zb’d up politically correct world that would be the case but luckily,in the real world, we have’nt arrived at that point yet.But maybe it’s only a matter of time in view of the ever increasing pc nature of British society. :imp: :unamused:

Just put a ■■■■■■■ sock in it carryfast :unamused: . Do yourself and everyone else a favour.

Rob K:
Just put a [zb] sock in it carryfast :unamused: . Do yourself and everyone else a favour.

Thought I was on your ignore list so was’nt really bothered too much about just putting it there for anyone else who might be interested.Obviously not you or most on here.Who cares.But having said that there’s no way that I’d let Fileep get away with that type of zb without saying something although up until I’d seen it I was taking your advice to just give up anyway because the place seems dedicated to one sided arguments and intolerance to different points of view.

Carryfast:

Rob K:
Just put a [zb] sock in it carryfast :unamused: . Do yourself and everyone else a favour.

Thought I was on your ignore list so was’nt really bothered too much about just putting it there for anyone else who might be interested.Obviously not you or most on here.Who cares.But having said that there’s no way that I’d let Fileep get away with that type of zb without saying something although up until I’d seen it I was taking your advice to just give up anyway because the place seems dedicated to one sided arguments and intolerance to different points of view.

That’s right, it is, you win, well done you, end of thread.

Carryfast:

Rob K:
Just put a [zb] sock in it carryfast :unamused: . Do yourself and everyone else a favour.

Thought I was on your ignore list so was’nt really bothered too much about just putting it there for anyone else who might be interested.Obviously not you or most on here.Who cares.But having said that there’s no way that I’d let Fileep get away with that type of zb without saying something although up until I’d seen it I was taking your advice to just give up anyway because the place seems dedicated to one sided arguments and intolerance to different points of view.

Ok you win, what with all you other supporters on here…oh wait a minute, not one person as agreed with a 47 year old man marrying a 16 year old child. Get over yourself and seek help because you are not right in the head. Any parent who let their child do this are also not right in the head. Tell you what, you seem to know alot about these people, put a picture of them up and lets look at what they look like together! I can picture them now!

Fileep:

Carryfast:

Rob K:
Just put a [zb] sock in it carryfast :unamused: . Do yourself and everyone else a favour.

Thought I was on your ignore list so was’nt really bothered too much about just putting it there for anyone else who might be interested.Obviously not you or most on here.Who cares.But having said that there’s no way that I’d let Fileep get away with that type of zb without saying something although up until I’d seen it I was taking your advice to just give up anyway because the place seems dedicated to one sided arguments and intolerance to different points of view.

Ok you win, what with all you other supporters on here…oh wait a minute, not one person as agreed with a 47 year old man marrying a 16 year old child. Get over yourself and seek help because you are not right in the head. Any parent who let their child do this are also not right in the head. Tell you what, you seem to know alot about these people, put a picture of them up and lets look at what they look like together! I can picture them now!

mirror.co.uk/sunday-mirror/2 … -20314085/

Look like just normal people with one head each to me. :wink:

It seems zb ironic though on a topic where most are defending a bunch of perverts in same ■■■ relationships that a normal couple in a male/female relationship have to defend and justify themselves against the prejudice of you lot. :imp: :imp: :unamused:

Although having said that the bit that gets me is that no one seems to be raising the (justified) issue of divorcees getting more chances in life while single blokes go without and in that context even I’m against age gap relationships as much as you are. :open_mouth: :laughing:

I’m just wondering if you might let your daughter read this topic and see if she can reach a more balanced opinion when she’s got all the facts.But don’t blame me if she sees sense and starts asking why it was that you told her boyfriend to zb off because he was just 5 years older than her. :open_mouth: :laughing: :laughing:

By the way those two in this story are married now although in this case I don’t get it either because I’m 52 and look a lot younger even now than he did then.Lucky zb. :open_mouth: :laughing: :laughing:

Rob K:
Just put a [zb] sock in it carryfast :unamused: . Do yourself and everyone else a favour.

:bulb:

Just had a look at that link.
About right for a god botherer

kr79:
Just had a look at that link.
About right for a god botherer

Yeah right CofE.So what’s new.Did’nt Henry V111 th pull Catherine Howard when she was around that age :question: :imp: .Like I said even I’m against the idea when it’s zb divorcees pulling younger single birds.But think you’ll find the reason for that is because of same age marriages and blokes wanting to trade in their older wives for a younger model so they get more than one chance through life by having more than one wife by starting out young with one of the same age.That’s why Henry V111th wanted a get out clause put into the idea of marriage so he started up his own church by making himself god. :open_mouth: :imp: :imp: :smiling_imp: :unamused:

one wife is enough all women are ■■■■■■■ mental

kr79:
all women are [zb] mental

If this one was interested you’d need to be the one who’s mental say that to her and who would give a zb how zb old she is. :open_mouth: :laughing:

bbc.co.uk/programmes/b012x158 01.05 :smiley:

■■■■ MY OLD BOOTS IS THIS STILL GOING ON! :unamused: :unamused:

Its like a Punch and Judy show :laughing: :laughing:

Carryfast you’re really really annoying me now!! If you are going to use abbreviations in your posts please ensure they are correct. For example:

Does not = doesn’t
Would not = wouldn’t

The clue is the letter that’s missing.

And by the way your views are total b*****ks.

Lillykins:
Carryfast you’re really really annoying me now!! If you are going to use abbreviations in your posts please ensure they are correct. For example:

Does not = doesn’t
Would not = wouldn’t

The clue is the letter that’s missing.

And by the way your views are total b*****ks.

I could’nt really care less wether you’re really really annoyed or not and dd has said before that he’s not that bovvered about the way that anyone decides to write something on here.It’s not surprising in the new zb’d up politically correct place that we’re living in that many people think that my ideas are total bollox but that’s to be expected when we’ve got a government that’s let the lunatics take over the asylum who can’t even provide any decent reasoning to back up their ideas. :unamused:

This old thread came up as new/unread, thanks to the new format.
I’m amazed at how accurately I interpreted Carryfast’s intellect, social position and lack of achievement, prior to reading this revealing tome.

That was quite a tall order packed neatly in an opening sentance of a paragraph.

I did get drawn in for a bit trying to unpick what the conversation was all about, I think CF was upset there was a gay couple scriptline on Eastenders.

There’s something to be said for consistency though: Mad as a hatter then, mad as a hatter now :grinning:

1 Like