Carryfast:
While it would be fair to say that the relatively few native Americans could justifiably view us and in fact the nation state of Canada itself as alien/immigrant there’s no way that anyone from the British Isles can possibly be described as an ‘immigrant’ in ‘Canada’.IE it’s a country actually founded mostly by us.
As for the ethnic African presence at least where I grew up let’s just say that in general it was effectively a case of respectful natural segregation on both parts.IE you wouldn’t find many if any living where we lived and vice versa where they were.On that note I’d guess that a 50/50 mix would have been the exception that proved the rule and probably the result of areas where white flight was already ( rightly ) becoming an issue.With the same situation definitely being the case across the river in Middx.Where having had to leave the area where I grew up to have to work in West Middlesex let’s just say that I got a shock as to the levels of friction between the indigenous and Asian communities that existed in the area.Which was another of the factors which made me ditch my Socialist principles.
All the above applying on an ongoing rolling basis where the division lines between the expanding immigrant and the existing majority indigenous populations are now almost to the M25.Whereas before they were much closer to London. 
The native American argument is how I respond when told to ■■■■ off back to where I came from, however as a white English speaking man living in a white English speaking country, it’s much easier for me to integrate into society. The same does not apply to the Filipinos, Indians, Chinese and to a lesser extent the non English speaking whites.
I grew up in Walworth, the Old Kent Rd, Elephant and Castle, call it what you will and there were a lot of black families. They had come to Britain after the war to make up the numbers as we had lost quite a few men of working age during the war. They all worked, both mums and dad’s and they fitted in quite well. Sure there were those that had an attitude about them, on both sides, but that’s always going to happen. There were even ghettos where most of the inhabitants were immigrants, but there were still locals living there, they may have been outnumbered, but their way of life wasn’t questioned or threatened, it was a live and let live society.
The situation now is totally different, the first wave of economic migrants from Eastern Europe that arrived came to work and better their life, the second wave came to ponce off the state and rob. The Muslim immigrants are totally different, they want to live as they lived in the countries they left, but on the taxpayer’s money. They do not belong, they have no intention of integrating and they never will, there is no way in a million years that it was ever going to work and you don’t need to be a rocket scientist to figure that out.
There is a reason behind this that could possibly be that it suits the people running the show (the world) as they appear to be happy that the middle east is in a state of uproar, they clearly want control of the natural resources contained within those countries. However history has shown them that they don’t go down without a fight. The Afghanistani Russian war proved that, so they need to play a different game. It may seem a little far fetched and conspiracy theory, but there’s no smoke without fire.
First they bring freedom (invade) Afghanistan, they wipe out a lot of the fighters and deal with the boys running the show to set up an operation to move the natural resource of Afghanistan (Opium) to market and raise funds for the ongoing campaign. Heroin use has risen exponentially in the west since the invasion of Afghanistan.
Then they let isis rampage through the region, after getting rid of Mr Hussein and the others that kept their kind in check, mainly through barbaric means, but they had them under control in any case. Now the isis soldiers are going to take a good few casualties as they go about their destruction at the will of the west and their numbers will decrease the longer the situation continues, so they push as many potential recruits as possible into the west, but that’s not good enough, they can easily return to fight again, so they stick them on a little island and give them things they couldn’t dream of in their homeland in an effort to keep them off the front lines. This way they can control exactly what both isis and the opposition can do, they are playing both sides.
When the whole region is destroyed, Israel will grow, Syria, Jordan and Palestine will be bombed out ruins and the closest Arabs will be a desert away in Saudi Arabia. The west and the Saudis will control all the resourses in the region and the little island in the north sea will be left to rot.
As I said, a little far fetched, but when you consider that the politicians and their puppet masters don’t give a flying ■■■■ about the man on the street and will do whatever they have to do in their pursuit of money and power, maybe it isn’t.
