I’m struggling to know where to start with all this guff you’ve just written.
Christopher:
Rob K:
Is this post for real?
- There is no problem doing a ton or more in lane 2, or lane 1 for that matter. If you are getting “sucked in” (WTF?) then learn how to drive or get a vehicle more suited to motorway driving.
I’m fully versed in the Highway Code thanks, I passed my test just as you did. Scored highly on HP and road awareness too.
I never said I was getting sucked in (why do you think I partly change lanes? To avoid anything like that potentially happening. My car will get moved by an unexpected crosswind far more quickly than your lorry will.)
Nevertheless a smaller vehicle passing a larger vehicle will encounter an element of pressure differential given relative speeds and displacement capabilities of the two vehicles. A little similar to how an aerofoil creates upward lift, but in a different plane; some people call it the “suction and release” effect (sounds a bit saucy to me ). Have you never encountered this when driving a car? It’s usually gentle but can catch people out if they’re just gently holding the wheel when passing a slower vehicle in Lane 1. (We’ve all done it at times.)
If you are too frightened of being “sucked in” when passing lorries then you need to either change to a more substantial car or get off the motorway as you clearly don’t feel safe driving on them. In my very early days of driving I had a 1.2 Nova (lighter than your Fiesta) and had no such problems that you describe so the problem appears to be in the driving seat.
You still haven’t answered specifically why “they” are idiots for doing a ton in lane 2.
- If you are getting high-beamed by “jokers” when you are in lane 2 it is because there is nothing in lane 1 and you should be in it.
Another one that doesn’t have a [zb] clue how to drive. Some reading for you : direct.gov.uk/en/TravelAndTr … /DG_070202
Would you consider it reasonable to travel in a rutted Lane 1 at 80mph or travel safely in the middle of the carriageway, allowing a greater margin for error should I have a blowout or encounter debris on the road? Or would you rather me travel in Lane 1, by the marbles at carriageway edge and any potential cruft falling off lorries / vans? I got a puncture driving in Lane 1 once, had to change a tyre on the motorway. Found a nail in the tyre. Also drove past one of those big jerry cans in Lane 1 in the night once, seems it had fallen off an HGV which had suffered a blowout on a load axle before stopping further up the carriageway. It shed a big strip of tread & cord in Lane 1 too. The jerry can would’ve ripped a hole in my front bumper, never mind if the blowout tread had got [zb] up into my wheel arch and stuck in the suspension, I only have a small car!
I was in Lane 2 so missed all of that just sailed past.
What wound me up was that the last time someone did that, the bloke in his Audi started off in Lane 1, moved into Lane 2 as he approached and madly flashed when he was right up by my arse. Having pushed me into Lane 1, he floored it. As I’m sure you’re aware, the Highway Code states it’s perfectly legal to pass someone on the nearside (i.e., passing someone in Lane 2 by remaining in Lane 1) if you are travelling faster than them, as long as you didn’t change lanes beforehand to enter Lane 1 - which is an undertake, or passing on the nearside, and not allowed in the Highway Code. He did it purely to ■■■■ me off at half two in the morning when we were the only two vehicles on the motorway for half a mile either way.
I’m just a grumpy old [zb].
Again, if you are too scared of running over/into “something” in lane 1 that you feel it necessary to drive in lane 2 all the time then you shouldn’t be on the motorway. I travel at 90 in my car on clear and quiet motorways and have no such problems driving in lane 1, and I also have fat 225 tyres on the front which are far more prone to tramlining than your 155s will ever be. No punctures nor flying jerry cans either.
If I’d have been the Audi driver I would’ve been tempted to flash at you for not driving properly as well.
“As I’m sure you’re aware, the Highway Code states it’s perfectly legal to pass someone on the nearside (i.e., passing someone in Lane 2 by remaining in Lane 1) if you are travelling faster than them, as long as you didn’t change lanes beforehand to enter Lane 1”
As it happens I am not aware of any such legislation. Please quote the exact phrase from the Highway Code which you claim to be so up-to-speed with.
Rob K:
mrpj:
Christopher:
ACPO sentencing guidelines advise rozzers to not prosecute unless people are going over 99mph
Discretion’s one thing but where did you hear this?
From his mate down the pub. Obviously.
Informal conversation with a solicitor who specialises in defending those accused of traffic offences. Officially the Sentencing Guidelines council doesn’t require a ban on motorways unless convicted of speeding over 90mph, in which case it can be a 7-28 day ban. Discretion on the part of the officers plays a part, sometimes people will get let off with a slapped wrist depending on circumstance. License revocation only occurs if the person was convicted of doing over a ton by some measurable means such as calibrated VASCAR, ANPR-enabled SPECS, HADECS (the digital gatsos on gantries) or bridge radar/Gatso - basically an HO type-approved measuring device.
PePiPoo has an amusing and useful calculator for estimating a potential sentence based on conditions, road type and confirmed speed: pepipoo.com/Magistrates_guidelines.htm
The actual guidelines are in a matrix on Page 131 of the MCSG: banksr.com/definitive_guidel … 08.pdf#131
The clue is in the word “guidelines”. Nuff said on that one. Feel free to put it to the test and post the outcome here for the benefit of the rest of us.