Unsurprisingly, CFs rabbit-hole is best viewed from a distance where you don’t get sucked into the quantum singularity of his bizarre, yet entertaining, world view
2 Likes
The quantum singularity that says that the amount of explosive vapour is directly proportionate to the amount of liquid fuel in the tank.If you think a full tank of petrol is less dangerous than an empty one in a fire that’s your choice.
I like you, you’re funny. Please don’t ever leave TruckNet, the entertainment you bring is the last living vestige of the old forum.
1 Like
You’ve got an odd sense of humour, Zac. 
It’s the “Saturday night trip to Bedlam to laugh at the unfortunates” type of humour.
A tad cruel I confess, but so much more satisfying than trying to take CF seriously
1 Like
…known in Victorian times as, ‘Quizzing the lunatics’ 
Nowadays it’s PMQs.
I’m sure that class 3 doesn’t say flammable vapour.It says the flammable liquid ( the liquid that creates the explosive vapour given sufficient air supply ).
An empty tank will more likely create and stop at the similar column of flame from whichever type opening as shown at the start of the video.
While in the event of a tanker fire the answer of it’s full, to the question is it empty or full, will get the attention of the fire service even more than the answer it’s empty.
Asylum indeed.
I wasn’t referring to your argument, CF: I was referring to the English idiom
Zac’s 999 call in Russian.
It’s an artic tanker load of petrol the garage and the trailer are on fire but luckily the tanker is full.
I consider my self to be reasonably intelligent, I’m a long retired old tanker driver who was in the ‘petroleum products’ industry.
I have to say I don’t know what the hell you are rambling on about. I read the stuff you post but… 
1 Like
Given the right (wrong ) circumstances a full tanker load of fuel can turn into an explosive fuel and air mixture as shown in the video.Yes or no ?.