Pizzey:
Reading those replies was so funny. Good to see ITV is so well respected out there. 
Hi Pizzey, Thanks for your answers. ITV would earn my respect, if what you’re trying to achieve were to be more balanced.
Pizzey:
Let me lay it down straight.
The programme will be looking at cycling issues in London.
Cyling has boomed in the capital since the 7/7 bombings and sadly this has led to an increase in the number of cyclists being killed and injured on Londons roads. Another sad fact is that around half of these deaths have had something to do with an LGV.
I’m happy to accept your figures, but will there be any attempt to tell us where the blame lay for for these sad deaths, or have you jumped to the conclusion that the LGV driver is always to blame 
If you come at this from the viewpoint that it’s never the cyclists’ fault, is it any wonder that ITV has a certain reputation 
I’d strongly advise you not to adopt the approach of “look what the big nasty juggernaut did to the poor cyclist” otherwise your programme might attract a some complaints to the broadcasting standards watchdog 
Now you’ve kindly stated your aims, do you honestly claim that your programme will be fair and impartial 
I’d like to see the answer to that in writing please
(I might even watch your programme then
)
Pizzey:
One part of this programme (about 5 minutes) is aiming to educate both groups of road users about how to avoid each other at accident blackspots.
Please consider that there’s not a great deal that a truck driver can do to avoid a cyclist in a slow-moving traffic situation, since a proportion of cyclists will simply weave their way through a traffic queue at a relatively fast pace, thereby placing themselves into a dangerous situation. The only thing an LGV driver can do is to keep up all-around observation, but this isn’t helped by the behaviour of a proportion of cyclists IMHO.
Pizzey:
The three things we need to film for this are:
1 - A drive through central London where a truck driver points out to our presenter (an avid cyclist) how cyclists put themselves at risk whilst cycling around trucks.
2 - Some reconstructions of how the most common crashes between bikes and lorries happen. (all filmed on private land)
These first two seem quite fair at first, but will you show an equal number of examples of LGV drivers’ fault Vs. cyclists’ fault 
If not, then perhaps you could justify this with some hard (verifiable) facts that LGV drivers are more to blame.
Pizzey:
3 - Getting a truck driver to go for a (very short) bike ride through London so they can put what they’ve learned about cycle safety into practice.
IMHO, #3 is potentially flawed. Let me explain in very general terms:
Most LGV drivers have cycled at some point in their lives, whereas generally, cyclists haven’t got a clue about trucks.
The cat “C” LGV driver you seek has passed at least two driving tests, one of them at a higher standard than a “car” test. What demonstrable competence must a cyclist have 
Generally, a truck diver is far better behaved in a traffic situation than a cylist.
There is a maintenance and MOT testing regime for trucks, but cycles have no equivalent.
(Just look at how many cycles a ridden willy-nilly on and off pavements, straight through red traffic lights, or at night without lights
)
If your programme sought to highlight the disproportionate enforcement of the the rules of the road against LGV drivers Vs. cyclists, or qualifications to even be on the road for both groups, I think you’d get far more support from truckers.
Enforcement against LGV drivers is verifiable against CPS prosecution statistics, but what evidence is there of effective and even-handed enforcement against cyclists 
How often are cyclists made to take responsibility for their actions 
In terms of fairness and the breadth of remit, IMHO, the objective of this programme might be misconceived.
Over to you Pizzey. 