Jingle Jon:
I’m not convinced that the occasional profanity used in order to speak in terms used by the common users, in any way alters the morality of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, perjury and or involving family members in such a conspiracy. None of which are the reason (I assume) for his impending court appearance.
There does seem to be amongst some in here general confusion between the two aforementioned, just as there seems to be an inability to differentiate between a party, night on the lash etc and an interweb forum.
Moving on from that though, Dozy (very apt), has in his first post atop of this thread demonstrated that he’s potentially dangerous - and not only to himself, but also to members of his family… whom he probably has the power to manipulate. That is quite sickening and not the action of a loveable rouge.
You registered fairly recently in this forum so I’m going to assume (always dangerous I know) that you’ve not been using it for very long. That being the case, you’ve probably missed a lot of Dozy’s previous work. Believe me, there are some corkers out there. Those of us who’ve been here a while and have kept up to date with his exploits have probably drawn our own conclusions as to his personality, style and motivations. You’re quite right, he often does come across as “dozy”, but he’s never come across as malicious, nasty or a deliberate law breaker. You used the term “lovable rogue”, IMO that’s a bit harsh, I wouldn’t ever describe him or his actions as roguish. Misguided, probably, I’ll advised, definately. Fixable, hopefully!
Accepting though that he probably needs help rather than punishment, I have decided that no call to authority would be good for anyone - particularly his family!!!
What I would say to him directly is… you are not smart enough to walk into a courtroom and tell lies to the experts, they will tear you limb from limb and you will make your dog pile much much deeper. Secondly, going on a public forum from where you are most likely very traceable, to ask advice on committing what the law considers to be very serious crime is very very dim. Get a [zb] grip
You’ve really got it into your head that he’s deliberately trying to cheat the system, and you’re taking it personally. He’s simply asked if something was possible, I don’t recall him stating as fact that he intended to carry out that act, especially after he was told in no uncertain terms not to.
In short, he dropped a bollock, got caught and needed advice. In the most part he got it. What he didn’t need was some drum head trial off an anonymous voice on the Internet.
I do hope that IF you ever drop a bollock in the future, you’re shown more compassion than what you’ve shown here.
Edit: In fact, you’ve bothered me so much I’ve just copied his replies from the first page. They reinforce what I’ve said, he wanted to know if he could, not that he intended to.
dozy:
If I was on days then I could ask for a early finish etc , but being away it’s not easy getting a appointment at this short notice with a solicitor , but yea I guess there not daft when it comes to moving savings , me I’ll accept what comming but it seems unfair to take savings into account when mine / Mrs are joint savings and she’s not actually done anything wrong , which is why I asked the question , they obviously need too check your ability to pay a possible fine , what you earn / outgoings , but what revelence would savings have .
Anyway I’ll leave it at that and seek advice if I can’t get it sorted in time ta (sic)
dozy:
Ta dave , wages , outgoings I’ve done correct , it’s just our joint savings that bothered me , I’ll put down what we’ve got
dozy:
From knowing of charge to going to court ive a couple of weeks , so yes I guess the know when large sums disappeared out of our accounts why , filled it in now and will see what the day brings ta (sic)