Company records for infringements

I understand that companies have to record all infringements for a possible DVSA inspection should it occur. Hence why one has to sign ‘Notification of Infringements’.

I had a couple of infringements that were not my fault as the driver
a] (with 1h30 DT spare with only 2 mile from destination) a certain road was blocked due to an accident at a roundabout ahead. Quite serious with air ambulance called, fire service and police. Vehicles had to about turn using a field entrance and all took a while. In my case I managed to park up after a longish diversion with 5 mins over. That is not an enforceable infringement I believe… I did all I could to take tacho break asap.

b] (2h30 WT spare) on my return south on the A1 I got into serious congestion due to roadworks near Pontefract about 1745-1800 it started and was then stuck for over 2h40 and had to continue for a further 30 mins until I could park up in a layby.

What I don’t know is should a company record separately mitigated infringements (as above examples which sometimes cannot be avoided) and infringements due to driver error (e.g. not allowing time for break/forgetting WT). At an inspection to me it would seem far better for a company to give a file for recorded mitigated infringements (perhaps numbering 200) and another file of driver error infringements (perhaps numbering 30) - separation puts a very different perspective in my view.

My company just has a record of all infringements. So what actually happens at an inspection and is my two file idea warranted?

There’s no point separating the ‘known’ and ‘unknown’ infringements.
When you know you’ve committed an infringement you’re supposed to do two tacho printouts, one for the driver, one for the office, both with explanations of the reason for the infringement written on them. The office copy of the printout should then be kept with the signed notification of the infringement.
A lot of companies will get drivers to write explanations of their infringements and what they will do to avoid getting them again on the infringement notification for ‘unknown’ infringements, basically to do the same job as the printout would have done had the driver known of the infringement

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk