mewdar:
The Charity is:-
Children in Need
OK so far. I’m sure that nobody would dispute that CiN is a respectable and deserving charity.
mewdar:
6000 members
235 viewings
2 Contributions
OK again. No argument there…
(Carefully worded ) This I don’t understand:
mewdar:
Admin Should set the example, then others might follow.
Admin T/W, Admin LDF, Admin OLT all contributed
mewdar, I don’t doubt your enthusiasm for the cause, but could you please explain your logic??
WADR, do you know the above for a fact?? (Eg. does that mean all the Admin teams, or all the Admins (personally) from each Admin team??)
The part that I don’t understand is that IMHO, Admins are as human as any other tier of any forum’s membership. As Admins there are fewer of them per (any) forum, so why select them as the target for comment?? I fail to see the logic of “Admin Should set the example.” Please read my four points below, then could you explain that comment please??
- My reason for asking that is that an Admin may or may not choose to donate.
- An Admin may be minted or skint.
- An Admin may or may not choose to say publicly whether or not they’ve donated.
- I’d say that the first three points could equally apply to any tier of any forum’s membership, so would you agree that they’re individuals and as such, are entitled to their own beliefs/wishes/opinions??
mewdar:
Hold your heads in shame
I haven’t given any opinion or commented in any other way on you or your post, because I don’t understand it, could you please clarify, because I don’t know whether I agree or not??
For my own part, I absolutely refuse to tell anybody how much I give, to whom I give or when I give. Quite simply, because it’s nobody’s business, except HMRC.
Finally, does it actually matter who begins the donations?? The most junior of new members might be the first to donate, and even do so with a large sum. Does any of this actually matter?? Isn’t it about CiN rather than inter-personal or inter-site rivalry as some have (correctly IMHO) already stated??