Evening all,Dennis, biggest problem that Renault had in the UK with the big Berliet designs, was not specifying a “tall enough” rear axle ratio, to cope with the high speed running ,( 60mph plus, rather than the generally less frantic European norm.)Consequently , (unless they were schooled before driving the vehicle), most drivers “thrashed along” at max revs, and chased the performance through the gears, which gained little, except increasing fuel consumption, rather than letting her pull along the rising torque curve.
As a consequence of the incorrect specification, the TR305s for the UK, were at the top end of their rev range when blatting down the M ways of this sceptred Isle, a problem that could have been eliminated when specifying the rear axle ratio from the works. The second problem, driver education on how to drive a “Maxi Couple” engined vehicle, would not have been an easy one to overcome. I know how “brittle” I would have personally felt if I was told that I was driving the vehicle incorrectly. Driver education on a vehicle is a process of “discreet steps leading to learning”, the man has to know how to get the best from a vehicle to give him pride in what he is doing. And its the little points that need covering as well, how to tune the radio, how the top bunk folds, how the night heater works etc. The little points are vital for overall enjoyment and satisfaction.
A difficulty all too often encountered, of putting a Demonstrator into a fleet operation running competitive vehicles. You may have chance to educate one driver in the best techniques for driving the lorry…but would he be able to show the next, and next and next…of course not!!! If you cannot guarantee that each driver will have the best chance possible of enjoying driving your vehicle, to the best of his, and the vehicles ability…well resist putting the vehicle into the fleet, unless you can control the demonstration properly…otherwise you are p… the money up the wall, and possibly “souring” opinion against your vehicle.
And the third obstacle, the image of the vehicle, the look of it, and the “kudos” in being seen driving it! Just looking at Bewicks picture makes me cringe!!! Factory primer chassis, cheap mudguard fifth wheel assembly, Factory standard finished primer cab, it looks like a low cost rental unit, not a demonstrator going into a Flagship Fleet!!! What sort of outfit turned that out? Not a professional one I will warrant! Personally I think that the Atkinson looks better, and if Id come off a 111, well I
d want to go back on it pdq!
Look back at the works demos, in the black, red, and chrome livery, now would you not wish to drive one of those, (and forget “Carole”, for she reeked of Garlic)! But the image with a well prepared demonstrator is there, it opens the door. All my French Dealer Demonstrators ran in livery, all were fitted with fuel consumption recorders, and non were allowed to go into fleets without proper tuition on how to get the best from the vehicle. All demonstration performance was monitored from the centre, with tight budgetary control . Too much capital was ■■■■■■■ in this area of investment to risk it not earning. And I was working in Markets receptive to the product, the team in the UK should really have been right on top of job, and never allowed the image to slip by allowing such shoddy presentation.
Somehow the UK market became used to the “free” lorry, Dealer, or Factory Demonstrators put into operators, large and small,with scant research into such basics as the operators nett credit worth, his previous buying patterns, and replacement policy, (if any). Just a sort of optomistic “hope” that thy would buy! Perhaps our Italian friends at Fiat had the most effective policy on Demonstrations…well Mr Operator, you take this 170.35, ready to go…at 40% discount, and three months credit…they did not have many come back, or on the 170.26, or the 619, and 684 before that!!! Maybe the UK market was only ever interested in “cheap” lorries?
Cheerio for now.