agency self employed

If the firm withholds tax deducted from you, to give it back at the year end - this I call “Pseudo-PAYE”.

The big risks with it is three-fold:
(1) If the firm goes ■■■■-up, that money you paid them as tax deductions is LOST, and HMRC will chase you for the amount all over again. You didn’t have to give it to the bust firm, so your folly is not their problem at HMRC…

(2) To mask their fees, the firm might well over-claim against tax, which goes wrong when you can’t actually produce receipts for all the offset claims made by them on your behalf. This is even more likely to happen once you’ve gone past certain thresholds, such as 12,000 miles @ 45p or whatever.

(3) Bent Holiday Pots: These are the ones that deduct monies from your NET pay, but when you take a drawdown when on holiday, - suddenly it’s a gross payment, and deducted all over again!
You are supposed to take 20 days “statuatory leave” per year. In my mind, the FIRM should provide you with some kind of holiday payment there that is NOT deducted from your pay… They are trying to have it both ways - crappy pay as if on PAYE, and no rights as if you were Self-Employed.

Boycott the bent agencies, and stick with the few good ones that play it straight, as I have. :sunglasses:
Folk are always moaning about the large number of agencies out there - that won’t change until some of them get forced out of business BY us, rather than waiting for some kind of “full-employment full timer sitation” before acting which, let’s face it, is never going to happen in 21st century labour markets. :frowning:

Winseer:
Boycott the bent agencies, and stick with the few good ones that play it straight, as I have. :sunglasses:
Folk are always moaning about the large number of agencies out there - that won’t change until some of them get forced out of business BY us, rather than waiting for some kind of “full-employment full timer sitation” before acting which, let’s face it, is never going to happen in 21st century labour markets. :frowning:

This ^^^

The problem is that you don’t always know who the abnormally bad agencies are until you’ve been subjected to their bull-crap.

Dieseloforme says about pay being £1 per hour more which is what my agency pays so I have checked my last holiday pay from last 2 weeks of march. My agency paid me £638.27 for 5 days or £127 per day so £3556 for 28 days. At £1 per hour you will have to work 75.6 hours per week over 47 weeks. If self employed that’s a lot of hours per week just to get holiday pay back and more than I work each week.

Dieseldoforme:

Truckulent:
A lot of drivers that go S/E haven’t a clue what they’re doing and
that’s one of the main reasons they can’t make it pay.

Your mate that is no longer self employed clearly didn’t suit self
employment and/or didn’t run the business well. For a start I
charge a fair bit more than the PAYE drivers get - if your mate
was charging just £1 more (where did you get that figure from??)
I’m not surprised he couldn’t make it pay. Secondly, you can claim
far more if you’re running a business than just travel/food and
holiday pay is also covered - if you charge appropriate rates
when you’re working.

.
.
You seem to have jumped onto a bandwagon that just doesn’t exist.

I am ONLY talking about Drivers who choose to go Self Employed
with an Agency. I have never mentioned umbrellas, limited companies
or whatever other tax fiddles are doing the rounds.

ALL Agencies seem to pay £1 per hour extra to Self Employed Drivers.
I have never seen any other figure.

My mate that you mentioned switched from PAYE to S/E after being
talked into it by the Agency that he was with. So were many others.

They were with * * * * but I won’t mention their name. At first they
did not have to produce many food receipts and no one checked the
mileage that they were sticking down.

Suddenly that changed. Mr Tax Man came knocking and the cost was
three grand because “They could not substantiate their claims.”
They did not challenge the HMRC findings so they were very lucky to
escape being fined for fraud.

As I have said before, the extra £1 an hour is widespread and it hardly
even covers the lost holiday pay. There is also the ficticious 45ppm
that is really worth 9 pence and, at the and of the day, a PAYE Agency
Driver can claim exactly the same benefit.

At the top of your comment you said,
“A lot of drivers that go S/E haven’t a clue what they’re doing”
Then you should educate them.

.
.

You’ve never seen any other figure but £1 more?? Are you surprised? Are you saying what agencies put in adverts are always facts and utterly believable? Do you think the agencies will advertise that they may well pay a fair bit more than that?? You have to negotiate. Some do, some don’t. You work for the ones that do. Many will pay a lot more than just a pound, especially for a decent, reliable driver at this time of year. Plus very often, the O/T rate will be similarly increased.

Equally, you can’t be fussy whether you’re working for an agency or direct. If you’re S/E, you’re S/E. You can’t say ‘self employment doesn’t work’, then say, ‘well it doesn’t if you only work for agencies.’ If you go S/E and then only work for an agency, you aren’t running the business properly, and you are likely to come unstuck. Limiting yourself in this way is not the best recipe for success. The point is you are running a business or company, not ‘working for agencies.’

With reference to your mate, you just admitted he (and by the sound of it the agency as well) didn’t have a clue what they were doing. Hence the issue with the tax man. If you ■■■■ up, they’ll cane you but that is the fault of the individual, not an inherent issue with self employment. If you make claims for expenses that seem unreasonable and you can’t prove it, they will come after you. That is a simple fact of running any business. Ask any accountant. If they didn’t challenge the findings they obviously had no records, so what did he (they) expect?

With reference to your final comment, why should I■■? The vast majority react as you have done in any case - with disbelief and by spouting about travelling expenses/food expenses etc., which are a tiny part of self employment. Look at this thread. Several drivers have said how they prefer S/E and seem pretty happy with it…

If you don’t understand how it can work, that’s fine, and you are definitely better off staying employed/PAYE in that case. There is no need however, to berate those that can and do make it work. :sunglasses:

tachograph:

Winseer:
Boycott the bent agencies, and stick with the few good ones that play it straight, as I have. :sunglasses:
Folk are always moaning about the large number of agencies out there - that won’t change until some of them get forced out of business BY us, rather than waiting for some kind of “full-employment full timer sitation” before acting which, let’s face it, is never going to happen in 21st century labour markets. :frowning:

This ^^^

The problem is that you don’t always know who the abnormally bad agencies are until you’ve been subjected to their bull-crap.

It took me just under a year of kissing a lot of frogs before I found myself with an honest joe firm. Most of the 9 I’d signed up with before settling down where I am now didn’t even bother to give me a single shift! Another 3 of them were endlessly trying to get me to go on unpaid “assessments”…
During this period, I ended up living off my redundancy pay, because I had hardly any actual income coming in.
The best agency for anyone is going to be different depending upon where one lives of course… I’ve heard in some parts of the UK, that Agency Drivers Network are supposed to be very good - not my experience near me. Blue Arrow are probably good if you live in town. Their jobs often involved unrealistic commutes which were just not worth it once you opted out of “salary sacrifice” like I did.

…Otherwise everyone would just sign up with the agency I’m with, and the others would be left standing with no drivers - right?

Ryy86:
Grovelling hahaha!

.
.
My friends in Gowskill and Cockpen tell me that you take the
longest route to work in order to wrack up 9ppm hahaha!

Silly Scotch Billy.

Let me save you all the wear, tear and fuel on your old banger.
For every £45 that you send me, I will send you £9 cash money.
I’m even prepared to split any profits 50/50 with you.
.
.

mac12:
Dieseloforme says about pay being £1 per hour more which is what my agency pays so I have checked my last holiday pay from last 2 weeks of march. My agency paid me £638.27 for 5 days or £127 per day so £3556 for 28 days. At £1 per hour you will have to work 75.6 hours per week over 47 weeks. If self employed that’s a lot of hours per week just to get holiday pay back and more than I work each week.

.
.
Yes, loss of Holiday Pay is often underestimated.
.
.

Truckulent:
You’ve never seen any other figure but £1 more ?

.
.
That is correct. It is very widespread with Agencies.

It must be very attractive to a lot of Drivers.
They shine with glee when talking about their extra nicker.

I would simply ask Drivers who go down this route to think
about what they will gain, what they will lose and what they
can claim for by being PAYE with an Agency.

PS - Please make sure that you receive ALL the outstanding PAYE
Holiday Pay if you do leave an Agency. You earn Holiday Pay for
EVERY single shift that you work on PAYE.

PPS - Make sure you know the date of your holiday year.
Your unclaimed Holiday Pay will help pay for your boss’s holiday.
Take a quiet 15 minutes to read your Terms & Conditions.
.
.

“Holidays” are worth around £3.75ph extra on self-employed pay imo.
You also need around £2.25ph extra to cover the umbrella fees.

Thus:

£16ph self-employed, with no holidays and fully into an umbrella scheme will have you taking home net per annum around the same as £10.00 PAYE with paid allowances which is what I’m doing.

Less is more, because I get holidays, effective sick pay, proper accountancy & tax stuff done, and most of all - it suits the life of irregular shifts far better than a scheme that only gets you ahead if you’re flat out every week work-wise. :wink:

I didn’t leave full time to work even more hours on agency, but when PAYE hourly rates hit £16ph (maybe by 2020) I’ll be seriously looking at going full time again. Until then, I’ll play the low-field game, and spend more quality time with my family. No point putting off things like that with a “I’ll sleep when I’m dead” attitude one comes across around here… :slight_smile:

I’ve already turned my nose up at doing a full time pallet job on agency pay because I really don’t fancy working 75 hours a week for £750 let alone the 75 hours per week for £500 that the full timers themselves get! :open_mouth: :open_mouth: :open_mouth:

It’s been 200 years since “getting yourself killed” was likely to make a profit so to speak.

Boney.jpg
“A man does not have himself killed for a half-pence a day or for a petty distinction. You must speak to the soul in order to electrify him.”

Dieseldoforme:

Ryy86:
Grovelling hahaha!

.
.
My friends in Gowskill and Cockpen tell me that you take the
longest route to work in order to wrack up 9ppm hahaha!

Silly Scotch Billy.

Let me save you all the wear, tear and fuel on your old banger.
For every £45 that you send me, I will send you £9 cash money.
I’m even prepared to split any profits 50/50 with you.
.
.

Give up already.

Dieseldoforme:

Truckulent:
You’ve never seen any other figure but £1 more ?

.
.
That is correct. It is very widespread with Agencies.

It must be very attractive to a lot of Drivers.
They shine with glee when talking about their extra nicker.

I would simply ask Drivers who go down this route to think
about what they will gain, what they will lose and what they
can claim for by being PAYE with an Agency.

PS - Please make sure that you receive ALL the outstanding PAYE
Holiday Pay if you do leave an Agency. You earn Holiday Pay for
EVERY single shift that you work on PAYE.

PPS - Make sure you know the date of your holiday year.
Your unclaimed Holiday Pay will help pay for your boss’s holiday.
Take a quiet 15 minutes to read your Terms & Conditions.
.
.

Instead of repeating yourself, why not read my post and try to understand that £1 extra for self employment is the advertised rate with these agencies… :unamused:

Truckulent:
Instead of repeating yourself, why not read my post and try to
understand that £1 extra for self employment is the advertised
rate with these agencies… :unamused:

.
.
I am only interested in advertised rates.
.
.

I’m not going to join the debate, although I think there’s far too many scenarios and people are getting wires crossed.

Being self employed, “self employed” (via agencies), on umbrella or set up as a ltd company are very different things with many similarities. I believe part of the problem and the reason the issues crop up so often are because people aren’t quite sure of the difference.

Dependant on your requirements and situations, you’ll benefit most from researching each option and and utilising the one that suits your needs. When your situation changes, re-evaluate and possibly change again. You change your car insurance every year, you likely remortgage (or at least you should!) your property every 2-5 years when your fixed term is up - so if there’s a system that’s not working for you, shop around. :wink:

FreddieSwan:
I’m not going to join the debate, although I think there’s far too many scenarios and people are getting wires crossed.

Being self employed, “self employed” (via agencies), on umbrella or set up as a ltd company are very different things with many similarities. I believe part of the problem and the reason the issues crop up so often are because people aren’t quite sure of the difference.

Dependant on your requirements and situations, you’ll benefit most from researching each option and and utilising the one that suits your needs. When your situation changes, re-evaluate and possibly change again. You change your car insurance every year, you likely remortgage (or at least you should!) your property every 2-5 years when your fixed term is up - so if there’s a system that’s not working for you, shop around. :wink:

Not unless the current one is ripping you off.

Fixes of less than 10 years are always a rip-off, and have been since the start of this century. If you want to bet on the future direction of interest rates, you’d be better dealing in the bond markets or even the futures and option markets on interest rates directly. The odds you’d get are a lot higher too! :sunglasses: It’s over 100-1 against interest rates being above 5% by the end of next year for example… Yet people on the street really think there’s a danger of a sharp rise in 2014! Mugs all of them. They are the ones queing up to buy 2 year fixes, which involve an up-front fee, AND paying an interest rate way above the base rate for the duration, with a penalty for coming out early (when you realise its a rip-off!) :frowning:
The true danger period for interest rates is 2018-2020 when rates actually could go anywhere, and quickly to boot. Try and get a fix that covers that period that doesn’t cost you an arm and a leg!

The truth is, most people don’t actually realise when they ARE being ripped off. Otherwise these deals, such as the examples given above, would not sell to anyone in the first place… :exclamation:

Because financial deals, be they insurance, pensions, mortgages, or investment trusts are all nil-sum games, in order for the firm to make money out of you, you in turn MUST lose out. :bulb: