15.65 Metre Semi Trailer

Pimpdaddy:

fingermissing:
Now look what labour wants :astonished: :open_mouth:

commercialmotor.com/laurie-d … ays-labour

Im all for it.

It says in that article ‘In layman terms; a trailer with a single rear-steer axle and two fixed axles is more manoeuvrable than a standard 13.6m long semi-trailer with three fixed axles because there is steering at both ends of the articulated vehicle that allows the truck to be driven in a straighter line.’ Funny that, I’ve seen one today with a smashed back end & the tail lift hanging off…

:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Maybe they forgot to tell the driver that such outfits can only be used in a straight line. :smiling_imp:
I think I can understand where they’re going wrong.They need to stop the unit from articulating around the axis of the trailer pin by making a non turning fifth wheel.Then make the whole outfit turn around the axis of it’s fixed rear axles instead.IE a rigid that’s as long as an artic. :open_mouth: :smiling_imp: :laughing: :laughing: The fact that the unit can no longer turn independently of the trailer will then reduce the tail sweep to manageable,or at least less severe,levels and even if it’s still too much the driver would at least be able to see what the rear corners are doing in the mirrors. :bulb: :smiling_imp:

But seriously no the ‘rear steer’ axle in this case is just there to support the extra length on the back and be able move with the tail sweep which is caused by the overhang past the fixed rear axles. :unamused:

fingermissing:
Now look what labour wants :astonished: :open_mouth:

commercialmotor.com/laurie-d … ays-labour

All this ■■■■ balling around these parties do…they dont seem to realise the massive fiancial risk hauliers are taking in purchasing these trailers only to be potentially told in ten or so years time your trailer can not be used anymore.

With regards to the allocation list, I did not appreciate there was as many take up’s with the shorter version.

Lusk:
With regards to the allocation list, I did not appreciate there was as many take up’s with the shorter version.

I knew there was a few of them on the road, I had even driven one of the shorter, longer ones without knowing it…

The curtains /box side has a yellow label on with a few letters/numbers followed by XL for the XL and XXL for the XXL trailers

One of these -

Do the shorter ones have the rear steering axle too?

Lusk:
Do the shorter ones have the rear steering axle too?

But it is only 1 meter longer than the normal trailer and has the 3 axles next to each other unlike the 15.65m version

LOL, ta.

I think they’re a flipping waste of time myself, the extra hassle involved for a few extra pallets just isn’t worth it. The length most of us run at now is more than enough for me.

What’s up with rear over hang■■? Used to run into centre of London with a trombone out to bout 52ft and few feet over hang on the back no problem. Run California over here axles got to be set at 40ft so you have a 13 ft over hang. Take your time and think a bit more

taffytrucker:
What’s up with rear over hang■■? Used to run into centre of London with a trombone out to bout 52ft and few feet over hang on the back no problem. Run California over here axles got to be set at 40ft so you have a 13 ft over hang. Take your time and think a bit more

A trombone doesn’t alter the overhang because it extends in front of the axles.Adimittedly if there’s one place with a more stupid government than the uk it’s California.The thinking required is about at the same level.You’ve got an artic with almost as much tail sweep as cut in so when you turn it you have to balance that by allowing almost as much room on the side that you’re turning to than the side that you’re turning away from :unamused: :laughing: although that’s not much help in the case of traffic that gets to close while you’re in the middle of a turn.But being that there’s no way to see what the rear corners are actually doing you’ll only know for sure when you here the crash that’s if you here it. :open_mouth: :smiling_imp: :laughing: :laughing:

Great speel bout nothing CF. Of course the trombone is affected you’re a lot longer plus the over hang and different for turns etc. Or are you talking through your vast experience again.
End of the day you addapt your driving style to what you are hauling and get on with it after all paid to drive the truck not just sit behind a steering wheel

taffytrucker:
Great speel bout nothing CF. Of course the trombone is affected you’re a lot longer plus the over hang and different for turns etc. Or are you talking through your vast experience again.
End of the day you addapt your driving style to what you are hauling and get on with it after all paid to drive the truck not just sit behind a steering wheel

Unless you’re saying that a trombone trailer extends the overhang not the middle of the trailer then I think you’re confusing cut in with tail sweep.IE the extra length of a trombone will make no difference to the tail sweep but it will make a difference to the cut in and cut in is a lot easier to deal with than tail sweep.Which is why anyone with any sense is saying that the extra length should have been added in front of the fixed axles and the axles then moved back keeping the overhang the same. :bulb:

You seem to have spent too long driving in California with a 53 ft trailer. :smiling_imp: :laughing: :laughing:

Carryfast:

taffytrucker:
Great speel bout nothing CF. Of course the trombone is affected you’re a lot longer plus the over hang and different for turns etc. Or are you talking through your vast experience again.
End of the day you addapt your driving style to what you are hauling and get on with it after all paid to drive the truck not just sit behind a steering wheel

Unless you’re saying that a trombone trailer extends the overhang not the middle of the trailer then I think you’re confusing cut in with tail sweep.IE the extra length of a trombone will make no difference to the tail sweep but it will make a difference to the cut in and cut in is a lot easier to deal with than tail sweep.Which is why anyone with any sense is saying that the extra length should have been added in front of the fixed axles and the axles then moved back keeping the overhang the same. :bulb:

You seem to have spent too long driving in California with a 53 ft trailer. :smiling_imp: :laughing: :laughing:

Bless you CF. No you extend the trailer out but because of where you are going you still to have the rear over hang because if you moved them back more you wouldn’t have enough room coz of the tracking of the trailer when you’re turning so you have to keep in mind that and the extra swing on the tail

No been to CA since xmas I don’t think n don’t miss it

Took a Trumbone 55’ out through Huddersfield and into a small village a few weeks back, no problem, and had a fantastic collection of wing mirrors when I’d done :wink:

Seen quite a few round here as H Parkinson have got loads for doing the toilet roll out of Barrow, none of their’s look to be bashed in either, Drivers and Screwdrivers perhaps?

Also seen a Marshall’s brick wagon that looks like one, but I didn’t think they’d get any more in under weight limits?

taffytrucker:

Carryfast:

taffytrucker:
Great speel bout nothing CF. Of course the trombone is affected you’re a lot longer plus the over hang and different for turns etc. Or are you talking through your vast experience again.
End of the day you addapt your driving style to what you are hauling and get on with it after all paid to drive the truck not just sit behind a steering wheel

Unless you’re saying that a trombone trailer extends the overhang not the middle of the trailer then I think you’re confusing cut in with tail sweep.IE the extra length of a trombone will make no difference to the tail sweep but it will make a difference to the cut in and cut in is a lot easier to deal with than tail sweep.Which is why anyone with any sense is saying that the extra length should have been added in front of the fixed axles and the axles then moved back keeping the overhang the same. :bulb:

You seem to have spent too long driving in California with a 53 ft trailer. :smiling_imp: :laughing: :laughing:

Bless you CF. No you extend the trailer out but because of where you are going you still to have the rear over hang because if you moved them back more you wouldn’t have enough room coz of the tracking of the trailer when you’re turning so you have to keep in mind that and the extra swing on the tail

No been to CA since xmas I don’t think n don’t miss it

I think the overhang/tail sweep is the same on a trombone trailer no matter what length you set it at isnt it?
Assuming the axles are fixed.

FarnboroughBoy11:

taffytrucker:

Carryfast:

taffytrucker:
Great speel bout nothing CF. Of course the trombone is affected you’re a lot longer plus the over hang and different for turns etc. Or are you talking through your vast experience again.
End of the day you addapt your driving style to what you are hauling and get on with it after all paid to drive the truck not just sit behind a steering wheel

Unless you’re saying that a trombone trailer extends the overhang not the middle of the trailer then I think you’re confusing cut in with tail sweep.IE the extra length of a trombone will make no difference to the tail sweep but it will make a difference to the cut in and cut in is a lot easier to deal with than tail sweep.Which is why anyone with any sense is saying that the extra length should have been added in front of the fixed axles and the axles then moved back keeping the overhang the same. :bulb:

You seem to have spent too long driving in California with a 53 ft trailer. :smiling_imp: :laughing: :laughing:

Bless you CF. No you extend the trailer out but because of where you are going you still to have the rear over hang because if you moved them back more you wouldn’t have enough room coz of the tracking of the trailer when you’re turning so you have to keep in mind that and the extra swing on the tail

No been to CA since xmas I don’t think n don’t miss it

I think the overhang/tail sweep is the same on a trombone trailer no matter what length you set it at isnt it?
Assuming the axles are fixed.

That’s what I was trying to tell him because the axles stay in the same places relative to the back end of the trailer.Whereas on this lash up they’re fixated on not increasing the cut in issue so they’ve added all the extra length behind the fixed axles then they’ve nailed a steering axle on the back which just follows the extra tail sweep around.

I’m driving one of these. Interesting to maneuver and of course as a newbie driver I’m glad I’ve got the night run as other drivers are more patient with my reversing… which is getting better lol.

Do have to watch leaving the yard though as without care its easy to clip the gate with the swing…

The company isn’t on that list but they are subbying for someone who is.

CF I was using the extra length of a trombone trailer plus the over hang as an example. You have the extra length as its extended so therefor cuts in behind you plus with the overhang no much different to the new length trailers plus with them you have rear steer something we didn’t have. Even the driver above as he says a newbie can cope fine with care. So whats the fuss about. Take your time and if unsure get out and check

Have driven the 15.65 quite often, main problem is when you try and park on MSA’s… especially when someone parks tight up alongside…
Once planners understand that not every delivery point can accept them things will improve. Having said that most of the 15s go to RDCs.
Just got to remember that tail swing, other than that I like them (which probably means I will smash one up tonight!!!)

Was overtaking one of Palletlines down Keele Bank last night and he had to back off rapidly when the rear end began rocking violently from left to right, at one stage i really thought he was going to lose it! :open_mouth: