dieseldave:
It looks like it’s time for a reminder of the forum rules.
There’s no need to mention any names at this point, but one or two folks seem to have forgotten that they’ve electronically agreed to the forum rules, which contain this little snippet:
Rule 3 also covers Personal Attacks. Attack the post but not the poster.
Just below the forum rules, there is a post which explains what happens next if you don’t reflect on this little warning.
It’s OK to attack a post by writing something like ‘the info in your post is crap’ etc, but it’s NOT OK to personally attack the person who wrote the post.
Please folks, let’s leave out the personal stuff.
Yeah Robbbbie, read the rules, you’re attacking a race of millions with your crap posts, which I totally disagree with, the info within them is crap, you ■■■■
dieseldave:
It looks like it’s time for a reminder of the forum rules.
There’s no need to mention any names at this point, but one or two folks seem to have forgotten that they’ve electronically agreed to the forum rules, which contain this little snippet:
Rule 3 also covers Personal Attacks. Attack the post but not the poster.
Just below the forum rules, there is a post which explains what happens next if you don’t reflect on this little warning.
It’s OK to attack a post by writing something like ‘the info in your post is crap’ etc, but it’s NOT OK to personally attack the person who wrote the post.
Please folks, let’s leave out the personal stuff.
Yeah Robbbbie, read the rules, you’re attacking a race of millions with your crap posts, which I totally disagree with, the info within them is crap, you [zb]
So there you go Robbbbie, not even wanted here so why dont you just ■■■■ off
Wouldn’t dream of attacking the poster, Dave.
No the opinions stated by rrrrrooobbbbiiieeieieee are clearly second hand, passed from ear to ear in a chinese whisper, and the person who started the whisper is a proper ■■■, but by the time it reached the poster it was distorted into utter crap…
So the info you have put in your post, robbbbiiibbbbiibbbeee is total ■■■■■■■■.
Ok let me see if I have the rules straight so we cant call the poster a scum sucking bottom dwelling toilet swimmer, but we can make a comment to a post someone else makes calling the poster a scum sucking bottom dwelling toilet swimmer. Nope thats not it We cant say that the poster is a scum sucking bottom dwelling toilet swimmer but we can say only a scum sucking bottom dwelling toilet swimmer would post such crap; right
Tomorrow, and tomorrow and tomorrow creeps at its petty pace to the last syllable of recorded time, and all Our yesterday have lighted fool’s their way to dusty death, out out brief candle. Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player, that struts and frets his hour upon the stage, and then is heard no more; it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
my god Robbieee must be older than dirt even William Shakespeare heard of him. Just look above.
Now who can argue with that.
The bloke is just jealous because he is stuck in the UK with no way out, he is trying to wind all of you up and seems to be achieving his aim … just ignore him.
I’d just like to give robbbie “The ■■■■ Of The Week Award” its normally given to 1 of our mountain bike crew each week but due to the weather here & lack of team members I’m giving it to him this week, he seems reading these threads to be thoroughly deserving of this award, it involves one of us riding for a day with a large ■■■■ attached to your head but his heads a ■■■■ full stop so nothing needs attatching by the sound of it Well done robbbie your " ■■■■ of the week " this week.
Tomorrow, and tomorrow and tomorrow creeps at its petty pace to the last syllable of recorded time, and all Our yesterday have lighted fool’s their way to dusty death, out out brief candle. Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player, that struts and frets his hour upon the stage, and then is heard no more; it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Wow. I am impressed how well read some of the users of this forum are, lol.
Rather enjoy Shakespeare’s insight into the human condition and the interpersonal relations within his plays… Just be glad I didn’t start quoting Edmund Burke or e.e.■■■■■■■■■ Although I could have quoted from John Locke’s Second Thesis of Government to some degree it does apply i did not think it appropriate to use as a quote. Was never interested in theater, but rather early English literature and government. History in general has a tendency to repeat itself. I think Charles and his wife may find that she although legally she can be entitled to be queen when her majesty the Queen decides to step aside; that there will be those who will challenge that within parliament. There are legal means by with she could be denied. I can hold my own in discussions involving maths and sciences but also literature and parliamentary governance.
)
