Peter’s ultimate aim is to get the candidate to a standard to pass the DSA test, not to provide training to assist with future assessments (although some trainers will go the extra mile).
Just want to clarify that statement. Yes, my first aim is to achieve the DSA test pass. Without that, no-one is any use to anyone! But I also consider it my job to prepare folks as far as we can for the real world. This is why if someone selects an auto for training and test, I encourage them to have an hour or so on a manual after the test pass.
But, as ROG as made abundantly clear, it doesn’t matter what gearbox you train on, there’s loads more out there waiting for you!
IMO, the sensible and measured way to look at this is to a) pass the test - so let’s make that as hazard free as we can and use auto and b) have some knowledge of other gearboxes that are out there.
Remember though, that it’s most unusual to get anything on 2 axles that hasn’t got a straight 6 or auto. Heavier rigids will be auto or something interesting. Artics are mostly auto - though there are plenty of manuals still in service.
We had our last new manual in Jan 2013. When it was delivered I asked the salesman how many other manuals he had sold that year. None, was the answer. I think that speaks volumes.
It’s also worth noting that the employer has a legal requirement to provide training on every different vehicle you are expected to drive. I know this is frequently overlooked. But the employer does so at his peril.
If anyone really wants to learn on a manual, I’ve got a yard full of them! No problem. Similarly, we are increasing the numbers of autos with the 3rd one (brand new again) coming in a couple of weeks time. In common with the logistics industry, we trainers have to move with the times and offer choice.
As I have said previously, to each their own.
Pete