Manual gearbox.

Franglais:
.
A bad driver can trash a manual box and clutch in a day. A decent driver will make a manual box last longer than an auto one.

That wasn’t always the case, I remember sending casual drivers out on night changeovers in the 80s, and listening to them crunching gears on my 14 speed Fullers as they drove out of the yard, and still crunching them on return next morning, :unamused: …total abuse by those who could not drive them. :unamused:
They still lasted ok (the boxes not the drivers :smiley: )
Then to go further back the old David Brown box was totally indestructible :smiley: , it used to take most drivers a day to suss it out.
Then the Spicer that was a total ball ache you HAD to get the revs coming down just right for it to go in anything like smoothly…

So maybe your point is accurate with the ‘‘girly’’ :smiley: synchro boxes like the ZF, but not in most cases of constant mesh/crash ''proper trucker ‘’ :smiley: boxes.

This is what amazes me,the fact that the gearboxes last so long given the inevitable constsnt crunching as they are used

Sploom:
This is what amazes me,the fact that the gearboxes last so long given the inevitable constsnt crunching as they are used

Quite.

Twin Splitter in particular, i don’t know anyone who didn’t play a tune on them for a few days to a few weeks till they got used, numpties arn’t a new invention and some never got the hang and many carried on crashing the gears permanently whilst others refused to drive them at all.
Where i worked in the late 80’s we had a whole fleet of MAN’s with Twin Splitters, a very good combination as it happens, every one of the fleet covered well in excess of 1m Kms with clutch and box faults being unheard of as were mechanical problems in general.

Can’t say as i’ve had any mechanical problems with constant mesh manuals over the years, don’t recall a single gearbox failure, had a clutch release bearing break up but seeing as the clutch was locked on it was just a case of starting the engine in crawler and driving it clutchless…try doing that with any current robotised auto.

The only problem manuals were synchro boxes, typically from the two Swedish makers who have seldom, imho with few exceptions, made a decent manual box for drivers, synchro causes gears to baulk and doesn’t allow the driver to ‘feel’ the next gear slotting-in speeds to mesh perfectly as one would get with a constant mesh box, always found synchro boxes much harder work for this reason, ironically the Swedes usually needing more gearchanges due to their often smaller (in swept volume) engines with short torque curves, British lorries fitted with for example a good old 14 litre ■■■■■■■ you really only needed half a dozen gears or 8 at the most, such was the massive torque available from almost tickover revs…last ■■■■■■■ i had was fitted with 8 speed Roadranger box geared @ 1100rpm @ 70mph in top, get on the M6 @ 38t and it took one hell of a hill to require a single downshift…which could explain partly why the boxes lasted so well.

Reading all that…

Juddian, makes me feel I know nothing at all about gearboxes, that’s despite passing my class 1 in 1983 and driving everything from Volvo boxes to Eaton to Fuller Iveco yadder yadder yadder. :smiley:

Currently driving a manual 14 plate Scania having come out an of an 08 opti-cruise there is very little that wouldn’t have been an improvement :smiley:

yourhavingalarf:
Reading all that…

Juddian, makes me feel I know nothing at all about gearboxes, that’s despite passing my class 1 in 1983 and driving everything from Volvo boxes to Eaton to Fuller Iveco yadder yadder yadder. :smiley:

Unfortunately, or maybe a blessing in disguise, my first artic wagon was a '72 build Foden S39 (early 60’s design), having Fodens very own 4 speed very constant mesh box with the 3 unequal split shifter mounted to the right hand side of what was amusingly called the dashboard.
Talk about a baptism of fire, no forgiveness in that box, no training either :open_mouth: , miss a gear and you’d most likely have to come to a complete stop and start again because to recover you needed to know all the ratios and the various combinations due to that unequal split, no ramming a gear in as you could with most others in desperation, the box would throw the stick back at you and quite likely break your wrist for daring to, but seeing as power steering wasn’t a thing you tended to develop strong wrists quickly.

I exaggerate not, sadly, however finally getting the hang of that anything that came afterwards was a doddle or even a joy in comparison :smiley: .
Not as i’d wish the same induction :question: to the world of trucking on anyone else, different days.

If you search out poster S Maylefication on Youtube, he tests drives an 8 wheeler two stroke Foden with the same box, its a joy to watch him expertly handle that gearbox on the wagon they had recently restored perfectly.

Many years later my son has passed his artic test, he’s done a few agency shifts for supermarkets etc (agency not exactly forthcoming with the clients about his lack of 2 years experience :smiling_imp: ) and one morning i get a phone call from him.
‘Dad i’ve got a Scammel Constructor 8 wheel tipper with a’, yes you guessed it, ‘Eaton twin split box, how do you drive it’…, i’m paraphrasing here, the wording might have been slightly more colourful at the time.
I gave him the rudimentaries and assured him it was the best thing could happen to him, yeah he played a tune on it for a week and hated it but on the second week it clicked and he still says he was glad to have had the experience because anything after that is a piece of cake.

Punchy Dan:

nomiS36:
Anyway Punchy Dan, I have been meaning to tell you the 3 wagon and drags and the rigid at our place are up for sale now so here’s your chance to buy ‘mine’ which could well be the newest manual you’ll ever find?

Not for me :open_mouth: ,what’s happening with your job then ?

Companies going into voluntary liquidation as soon as we’ve shifted as much stock as the customers will take. Then The remaining staff that haven’t already been finished, about 10 of us including 2 drivers will be made redundant [emoji30]

Although its not really my concern I find that I use less fuel when driving a manual. What do others think?

Punchy Dan:
Eaton / fuller 21 yrs old ,it’s not the box that people can’t do it’s the twin plate clutch and it’s organic not ceramic too .

Bloody Victorian… :smiley:

Juddian:

yourhavingalarf:
Reading all that…

Juddian, makes me feel I know nothing at all about gearboxes, that’s despite passing my class 1 in 1983 and driving everything from Volvo boxes to Eaton to Fuller Iveco yadder yadder yadder. :smiley:

Unfortunately, or maybe a blessing in disguise, my first artic wagon was a '72 build Foden S39 (early 60’s design), having Fodens very own 4 speed very constant mesh box with the 3 unequal split shifter mounted to the right hand side of what was amusingly called the dashboard.
Talk about a baptism of fire, no forgiveness in that box, no training either :open_mouth: , miss a gear and you’d most likely have to come to a complete stop and start again because to recover you needed to know all the ratios and the various combinations due to that unequal split, no ramming a gear in as you could with most others in desperation, the box would throw the stick back at you and quite likely break your wrist for daring to, but seeing as power steering wasn’t a thing you tended to develop strong wrists quickly.

I exaggerate not, sadly, however finally getting the hang of that anything that came afterwards was a doddle or even a joy in comparison :smiley: .
Not as i’d wish the same induction :question: to the world of trucking on anyone else, different days.

If you search out poster S Maylefication on Youtube, he tests drives an 8 wheeler two stroke Foden with the same box, its a joy to watch him expertly handle that gearbox on the wagon they had recently restored perfectly.

Many years later my son has passed his artic test, he’s done a few agency shifts for supermarkets etc (agency not exactly forthcoming with the clients about his lack of 2 years experience :smiling_imp: ) and one morning i get a phone call from him.
‘Dad i’ve got a Scammel Constructor 8 wheel tipper with a’, yes you guessed it, ‘Eaton twin split box, how do you drive it’…, i’m paraphrasing here, the wording might have been slightly more colourful at the time.
I gave him the rudimentaries and assured him it was the best thing could happen to him, yeah he played a tune on it for a week and hated it but on the second week it clicked and he still says he was glad to have had the experience because anything after that is a piece of cake.

i could never understand why manufacturers came up with the amount of gears they thought they needed , difficult to explain but in my christian salvesen days i had DAF come in with a 75 tractor unit , obviously it had the , i think 9 litre engine for about 300 hp , (this is early 2000’s i think) the company gagged for me to take it as a demo , so i asked the DAF man , ‘why has the 75 only got an 8 speed box then , when the 330/360 Cf’s i’m running have the 16 speed then ?’ he hurrumphed around for a bit so i added my next bit ’ you ever driven a low power motor at full weight then ? ’ answer ’ well no not really’ , well having been an afficianado of a c series ERF 250 ■■■■■■■ L10 at 38 tonnes (more if he could get away with it) 9 speed road ranger, i told him the lower the power the more bloody gears you need , he went away and so did the 75. we also had a meeting which included the volvo and daf sales geezers , i sat there while they waffled away , my question 'why is it that you both have the nearly same hp engine , same kind of torque , etc but volvo has an 8 speed , but the daf 16 , well that was another skip over an answer on that , but i’d had an agency night man completely trash a ZF on a CF as he ran it in low split all night as he didn’t know it had a splitter, i know , i know ,‘should have been explained to him’ but the night shift were up to their nads in work and it got missed. still i did once have the pleasure of 45 minutes attempting to get an agency man to understand a twin splitter , might as well have done the job myself, would have been quicker.
tony- i drive a pc now - with an ERF badge stuck to it

alamcculloch:
Although its not really my concern I find that I use less fuel when driving a manual. What do others think?

Unfortunately, not everyone is a good driver, and not everyone has mechanical knowledge/sympathy, and for those the auto can gain decent fuel figures and protect the vehicle and its drivetrain from the abuse of drivers out there who don’t care or don’t know.

Juddian:

alamcculloch:
Although its not really my concern I find that I use less fuel when driving a manual. What do others think?

Unfortunately, not everyone is a good driver, and not everyone has mechanical knowledge/sympathy, and for those the auto can gain decent fuel figures and protect the vehicle and its drivetrain from the abuse of drivers out there who don’t care or don’t know.

Well, I’ve done 345,000 kms in ‘mine’ and it’s had no driveline issues at all whereas the 19 plate which has done fewer kms has already had to have a new propshaft. MPG is broadly speaking about the same [emoji56]

Where autoboxes are a pain in the ■■■■, is when they are used offroad on construction sites. With manuals you could ‘feather the throttle’ to get yourself out the mire whilst still staying in the same gear. Autos don’t let you do that, plus they seldom select the right gear for travelling on anything other than smooth tarmac.

imho there are only 2 boxes,(and like many on here) i have used them all…

  1. e.t s without a doubt, once mastered.

  2. i shift. smooth and v/good under manual control…

also comfort shift was preety good… :neutral_face:

LIBERTY_GUY:
Where autoboxes are a pain in the ■■■■, is when they are used offroad on construction sites. With manuals you could ‘feather the throttle’ to get yourself out the mire whilst still staying in the same gear. Autos don’t let you do that, plus they seldom select the right gear for travelling on anything other than smooth tarmac.

Not easy to “rock” an auto out of muddy or snowy/icy sites.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nomiS36:

GOG47:
71 plate Daf CF 480 with a 16 speed ZF manual, replaced a 18plate 450 with the same. All 5 of ours are manual after a lot of grief with merc autos previously. In fact anything to do with the Mercs were grief, lol. We do timber haulage so manual give more control when it gets sticky

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ah, good for DAF for Keeping the manual gearbox an option. That’ll be the same ‘box as my MAN then.
I need to get a job on the timber, always thought I might enjoy it. Sadly, it’s not really an industry round South Yorkshire [emoji19]

It’s not the worst job right enough[emoji106][emoji1787]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Turn this on it’s head; if you were in the market for a new personal car would you opt for manual or automatic? Personally I’d go for auto every time, with one proviso, it must have a big engine for it to work properly…

My g/f is in the car trade and generally gets to choose a brand new company car on a monthly basis. She always opts for auto after falling in love with the auto 3.2 litre Merc I bought her. The problem is that these are invariably six or seven speed autos coupled to an asthmatic 1.2 litre eco engine, so you get the ridiculous situation that on a flat motorway at a constant throttle the bloody thing is constantly changing up or down which infuriates me.

the maoster:
Turn this on it’s head; if you were in the market for a new personal car would you opt for manual or automatic? Personally I’d go for auto every time, with one proviso, it must have a big engine for it to work properly

youtube.com/watch?v=xrC-9Um_mLI

youtube.com/watch?v=6l-n_rQfp60

This is a similar set up to mine except it’s the XJ saloon.

youtube.com/watch?v=CFVOXsVN97Y

New or old makes no difference would always choose manual by choice.There is a thriving auto to manual conversion industry for a reason especially big V8’s and V12’s.Torque converters generally eat power under load and cook brakes on the overrun in addition to usually providing the wrong gear at the wrong time.
In most cases the choice is aftermarket conversion or nothing.Very few big engine with manual options have been available for years if not decades.Vauxhall VXR8 or Camaro being two with residual values to match.
youtube.com/watch?v=t4zSIVpVMaw

Punchy Dan:
I heard the Cf Daf has gone from a rod to cables and back to the rod again ?

Not as far as i know Dan ,they went to cables as there was no room under the cab for the good old rod …

the maoster:
Turn this on it’s head; if you were in the market for a new personal car would you opt for manual or automatic? Personally I’d go for auto every time, with one proviso, it must have a big engine for it to work properly…

My g/f is in the car trade and generally gets to choose a brand new company car on a monthly basis. She always opts for auto after falling in love with the auto 3.2 litre Merc I bought her. The problem is that these are invariably six or seven speed autos coupled to an asthmatic 1.2 litre eco engine, so you get the ridiculous situation that on a flat motorway at a constant throttle the bloody thing is constantly changing up or down which infuriates me.

I don’t have auto cars either [emoji23] I’ve got a 3.0 diesel bmw which has got a lovely 6 speed manual.