Lend me your stories of Welcome Break

youtube.com/watch?v=Dz1gLNNK-NQ

tango boy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz1gLNNK-NQ

[emoji106][emoji122]

Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk

The campaign is starting. Just waiting for Rikki’s permission to share the link to the petition which is now running on Parliament’s website.

nsmith1180:
The campaign is starting. Just waiting for Rikki’s permission to share the link to the petition which is now running on Parliament’s website.

Good luck with this Nick, I can understand your frustration.

nsmith1180:
The campaign is starting.

This just popped up on my faceache newsfeed shared by a friend

scottie0011:

nsmith1180:
The campaign is starting.

Force motorway service areas (MSAs) provide security for visiting HGVs at night. - Petitions

This just popped up on my faceache newsfeed shared by a friend

Wow, t’Internet works.

Well, if you want your petition to stand the slightest chance of being taken seriously, you should have proof read it first.

Olog Hai:
Well, if you want your petition to stand the slightest chance of being taken seriously, you should have proof read it first.

What mistake have you spotted. I apologise for it but it took half a day and several re-writes to get all the information I needed into it, its possible I slipped in an error.

nsmith1180:

Olog Hai:
Well, if you want your petition to stand the slightest chance of being taken seriously, you should have proof read it first.

What mistake have you spotted. I apologise for it but it took half a day and several re-writes to get all the information I needed into it, its possible I slipped in an error.

“Force (MSAs) {to} provide…” ?
Anyway, not ambiguous at all, and clear enough.
And if the number of signatures is enough, it`l be taken seriously whatever the details of the grammar. (one more there, by the way).

Franglais:

nsmith1180:

Olog Hai:
Well, if you want your petition to stand the slightest chance of being taken seriously, you should have proof read it first.

What mistake have you spotted. I apologise for it but it took half a day and several re-writes to get all the information I needed into it, its possible I slipped in an error.

“Force (MSAs) {to} provide…” ?
Anyway, not ambiguous at all, and clear enough.
And if the number of signatures is enough, it`l be taken seriously whatever the details of the grammar. (one more there, by the way).

Bugger! In my defence its better than Force (MSAs) 2 provide which was all the characters I had left!

nsmith1180:
The campaign is starting. Just waiting for Rikki’s permission to share the link to the petition which is now running on Parliament’s website.

Signed…

Make the link a sticky, for all to sign, I know there will be the nay-says, but unless you try…