Why is it any different from Rishi Sunak et al. accepting a salary?
At least Trump refused his.
They do not have housing available to them, it is occupied by others who they would need to evict. If that is how he earns his living as a landlord what’s wrong with that? It’s like saying MPs should not have staff, they should just get their spouses to help them for free.
It isn’t the same at all. Strawman argument.
[quote=“stu675, post:21, topic:154137”]
At least Trump refused his.
[/quote] He certainly claims he did.
Some was donated to charity but it isn’t clear that it all was.
But…so what?
That was purchased using taxpayers money to subsidise the mortgage on it.
How many “landlords” get their “businesses” subsidised in this way?
Straw man nonsense.
I’ll grant you that, although again legal. (Funny that it’s them that make the law 
)
Legal, agreed.
Not “commonsensical” though, I would say.