Lucy:
I suppose the bottom line of it is this. This particular bit of webspace belongs to TNUK, and we are happy for the membership to use it, free of charge, so long as they can respect OUR rules. The original rules were far lax-er (is that a word?) but as the site grew, people stopped respecting them, so they got tighter. Blame the members that went before you. In the meantime, if you don’t wish to observe the existing rules, don’t use our webspace. It’s that simple.
Now I really am off to work.
Do you know what I won’t use your bit of the web site.
I asked a question and got treat like some kind of leper
The rules will get tighter and tighter because all people are different and see things in different ways.
All I asked is are we censored too much not are we censored by TNUK too much or by Lucy too much.
What annoyed me the most was trying to add a link for a job int the watford area it came up zb and that is a little over kill.
Language is forever evolving and words are getting used in different context all the time for example the word ■■■■■■ as several meanings some acceptable some not quite as acceptable.
■■■■■ is another in parts of the world it means great courage but in other parts it is used as slang for ■■■■■.
Why have people taken it mon themselves to be the guardian of the human race, protect them from the bad words.
marcus I have 4 children who use the PC’s in my house without any parental control software but they don’t see any ■■■■ or violence, well maybe my 12 year old looks for ■■■■■ occasionally but that’s his age.
Kids these days by the time they leave school they know more profanities than what we do and use them more than what we do.
It is part of the language and all of them are in the Oxford E nglish Dictionary passed down from generation to generation.
All I wanted was a debate on censorship but it seems like a taboo subject
I might have put it in the “wrong” place to start with but that got sorted straight away and then was belittled for asking such a question.