Carryfast:
So exactly what is it about any of that what I’ve written that shows ‘reprehensible’ views concerning race relations and/or racial hatred and why is it that defending myself against the bs accusations made by the op,amongst others, is being viewed as off topic .
anybody’s views concerning race relations and /or racial hatred are off topic as this is a truck drivers forum .
The clue is in the name at the top TRUCKNET
As site admin, why are you not banning him■■?
SITE RULES: Rule 3 No racism
Clearly by letting him stay and continuing to spread his vile views on every [zb] thread you are in support of his racist opinions Denis. Unbelievable.
And by letting you spread your vile views concerning coppers and the ideas of vigilantes he must by the same logic support your opinions .
Carryfast:
So exactly what is it about any of that what I’ve written that shows ‘reprehensible’ views concerning race relations and/or racial hatred and why is it that defending myself against the bs accusations made by the op,amongst others, is being viewed as off topic .
anybody’s views concerning race relations and /or racial hatred are off topic as this is a truck drivers forum .
The clue is in the name at the top TRUCKNET
As site admin, why are you not banning him■■?
SITE RULES: Rule 3 No racism
Clearly by letting him stay and continuing to spread his vile views on every [zb] thread you are in support of his racist opinions Denis. Unbelievable.
And by letting you spread your vile views concerning coppers and the ideas of vigilantes he must by the same logic support your opinions .
Obviously not and only someone with an incredible low intelligence level would even bother attempting to compare the two. My posts on coppers break no rules. Your posts are 95% racist as once your inane rambling is cut away they are all anti-ethnic minorities which very much break rule 3. The other 5% are axle configurations, which - while not breaking any rules - once again no-one has any ■■■■■■■ interest in.
never read so much bulls droppings in my long life
have you lot not got anything better to do with your lives ?
surely some of you appear to have a sad existence that leaves a lot to be desired and no matter what miserable lives you may have in the deprived areas where you must live there must be better things to do with your time such as watching paint dry ?
The admin team on this site clearly agree with Carryfast by refusing to remove his racist posts and so therefore must also agree to inciting racial hatred themselves.
Can this site sink any lower? Should the CEO of RBI be contacted regarded this flagrant mis-management?
Rob K:
The admin team on this site clearly agree with Carryfast by refusing to remove his racist posts .
No they don’t Rob
So why aren’t his posts being removed in accordance with rule 3 then? Clearly the admin team has their own agenda if they are not administering the site in according with the rules stated. I don’t see any other reason for them to be left on view unless you agree with him. One rule for one…
So exactly what is it about any of that what I’ve written that shows ‘reprehensible’ views concerning race relations and/or racial hatred and why is it that defending myself against the bs accusations made by the op,amongst others, is being viewed as off topic .
I wasnt commenting on your veiws just stating every topic you get involved in ends up as a free for all about anything and everything except what it started as.
This is the last time i will be getting dragged in to these stupid arguements as they are pointless and i have no interest of how good life would be in brain dead alabama while married to your own 12 year old sister
Rob K:
The admin team on this site clearly agree with Carryfast by refusing to remove his racist posts and so therefore must also agree to inciting racial hatred themselves.
Can this site sink any lower? Should the CEO of RBI be contacted regarded this flagrant mis-management?
As I said to wheelnut.If what I’ve said incites racial hatred then it’s a case for the courts and the police.But the case for the prosecution won’t look good when they check out my ‘actual’ position on the subject which is on record here and the credibility of one of their main witnesses who is on record as saying that the police are all scum worse than rioters and self appointed vigilantes,like him we can only assume,should be allowed to go and cave in the heads of anyone who he decides is a rioter.
At which point assuming that one of those vigilantes is white and one of those rioters happens to be black,highly probable considering the type of areas in question,where the riots in London occured,then that is more than likely to cause further inter ethnic issues just as if the majority white police force in that area did the same thing would.That’s what I call inciting racial hatred.
But yeah right report all my comments to the law if you want to but just make sure they’re given all the facts first.
switchlogic:
Brace yourself everybody, he’s online as we speak!
Not for much longer so you’ll be able to just agree about everything amongst yourselves after that.
Thats the first full sentance of yours Carryfast, that I have managed to read without my eyes glazing over…
Unfortunatly for Switch, I agree with your sentiment.
Internet Forums are the ideal place for people to put out hateful, corrosive and irrelevent views and then just have them shot down in flames just like what normally happens to you.
The worst punishment that an Internet Poster can receive is that other Internet Posters ignore them.
Rob K:
The admin team on this site clearly agree with Carryfast by refusing to remove his racist posts and so therefore must also agree to inciting racial hatred themselves.
Can this site sink any lower? Should the CEO of RBI be contacted regarded this flagrant mis-management?
As I said to wheelnut.If what I’ve said incites racial hatred then it’s a case for the courts and the police.But the case for the prosecution won’t look good when they check out my ‘actual’ position on the subject which is on record here and the credibility of one of their main witnesses who is on record as saying that the police are all scum worse than rioters and self appointed vigilantes,like him we can only assume,should be allowed to go and cave in the heads of anyone who he decides is a rioter.
At which point assuming that one of those vigilantes is white and one of those rioters happens to be black,highly probable considering the type of areas in question,where the riots in London occured,then that is more than likely to cause further inter ethnic issues just as if the majority white police force in that area did the same thing would.That’s what I call inciting racial hatred.
But yeah right report all my comments to the law if you want to but just make sure they’re given all the facts first.
As per usual :
you are making no sense
you are comparing apples with oranges.
I am not on about courts, police and prosecution - you said all that, not me. What I am on about is that there is a rule HERE on THIS site, namely rule 3 that quite clearly states “no racism”. Which part of that are you having difficulty understanding fgs? You have repeatedly broken that rule in your posts by stating that you don’t want anything to do with them, won’t live near them, they should all be rounded up like cattle and forced to live in set areas away from everyone else etc etc etc.
Trying to compare that to me saying that I think the police are scum is simply ridiculous. For a start there is no law preventing me from saying it (unlike your racist comments), and nor is there any rule on this site preventing me from saying it (once again, unlike your racist comments).
It doesn’t prove the Op was right. Look , here’s the dance… Carryfast it appears does not like black people (i’m not saying thats the case, i’m just using it as an example), there’s nothing wrong with that. Apart from the fact that he seems to mention all these ‘facts’ and ‘history’ willy nilly and interjects them willy nilly !! In other words what Carryfast thinks is up to him.
If on the other hand some one like me in the position of moderator should exhibit the same ideas then it may be said that i could be compromised in my fair dealings with members and i would not be fit to deal fairly . Carryfast has no such responsability upon him other than to abide by the rules.
In conclusion, Carryfast spouts crap, about inappropriate stuff at inappropriate times. Look through the boards and you’ll find the same applying to many people. Many tend to wander and drift.
If he oversteps the line then he knows the score.
.
My posts on coppers break no rules. Your posts are 95% racist as once your inane rambling is cut away they are all anti-ethnic minorities which very much break rule 3. The other 5% are axle configurations, which - while not breaking any rules - once again no-one has any ■■■■■■■ interest in.
