commonrail:
Why don’t you apply…winseer?
It’s decent money,and you won’t have to cross the river.
You could volunteer for all those premium uplift shifts…that nobody else wants 
I’ve already been and gone from Snodland. Got called in one night, arrived and then got cancelled. My contract said “8 hours if sent home once arrived”, but Client leaned on agency to “let it go or else”.
I asked for the money and fair enough, I won’t bother going back. I didn’t go back, and they still defaulted on the pay as well. 
Nothing offends my Left leaning sense of Financial Fairness other than some rich outfit stealing money from those like myself who are already living from hand-to-mouth, and cannot afford to be ■■■■■■ about by these crooks that run the “partnerships” all too often, where “outsourcing” seems to merely facilitate exploitation of the workforce whilst shielding behind layers that protect the firm from lawsuits, and the like. “Not directly employed. Not our fault if anything goes wrong, or anyone wants to claim”.
In any case, I’ve not worked there since, nor do I intend to. This is an issue outstanding I have with Wincanton, rather than Tescos. Looked at Sainsbury’s Dartford recently, but walked on by once I found out that it was indirect via DHL, and of course that old much-hated chestnut “Any five from Seven” when I’m looking for a 4x12 hour shift working week at a high hourly rate OR less, long(er) shifts per week on the ZHC basis.
Agencies from here on in my mind will end up covering full timer’s sickies, and nothing much else.
Full timers on annual leave - will be managed so that other “any five from 7” people end up covering the scheduled absences, I reckon.
That’s a pretty bleak world for agency work to come, unless 1 or 2 shifts per week actually suits one…
The thing about holding out for a 4 shift contract is that if the worst comes to the worst, one will end up working 15,15,15, &13 hours per week legal maximum, or 52 hours.
If you get the dreaded “any five from seven” then how often is one going to end up with 15,15,15,13,13 - 65 hours per week for a bloody salary■■?
“Paid by the hour” on ZHC ain’t no good if the firm turns out to be pennypinching on those drivers that like myself, - seem to be coining it in rather more than the full timers, causing sufficient resentment to get backstabbed at the first opporunity, as I’ve found from hard experience…
Now 48-55 hours over 4 per week I can manage, 55-84 hours over 5 or 6 is right out. I’m deadbeat by Wednesday, and as I’ve said on here before, I hate getting the nodding dog feeling when returning home, usually thursday morning after my third 15 hour shift that week. I’ve also got the worry that the job is the same the last two shifts of that week ahead of me, with no indication that it’ll be any shorter than 15 hours for the 4th and 5th time, which would have been totally illegal had I attempted it of course… The last time I found myself in that situation, I refused to do the thursday and friday nights, and that was another job gone for my impertinence… It seems that one does NOT have the right to “turn down a shift”, regardless of what one’s contract says…
In any case, I’ve adopted a different approach from here on, which is to be an asset rather than a liability to my employer in the shrinking marketplace that is the case these days, “Ongoingly”…
Essentially, I want to do as much as possible to make sure that I’m the “last one to go” next time around.
It may well be years and years before firms change their ways, get rid of all this “Just in time” outsourcing model, and start offering decent full time actual wear-the-shirt contracts once again.
Some of us must look back on the 70’s with nostalgia rather than dread, I reckon. I was a kid then, but I’d put it to any seniors out there - WERE the 70’s a better time to drive a truck than now, working for a unionized firm with pay way above the national average at that time?? 