newmercman:
Carryfast:
This time I think even newmercman would agree that there’s a method to my madness.You shouldn’t ‘think’ Crazyfast, that’s when the problems start
I reckon your current idea is as bad as all the rest of your plans for ■■■■■■■■■■ of the transport industry, you’ve now given up on the Poles and are redy to take on the Americans but just for argument’s sake, what exactly are you going to carry on your TransAtlantic operation? Pretty much the only thing the UK exports to America are empty sea containers, they have ships that carry 6500 TEUs, I very much doubt they need you to help out, even in one of your wagon and drags with a 20’ on the prime mover and a 40’ on the drag
Nurse Ratchett must’ve mellowed in her old age to allow you near a computer, mind you, even though you’re as silly as a box of frogs, I find you entertaining
No you’re right Britain exports zb all to anyone anymore but I think there’s more going into the states from europe as a whole than comes back. But in view of the relatively small amounts then a low capacity good service TIR operation seems better than a shipload of empty containers but obviously ACL don’t agree or they’d be using a proper ro ro only ship instead of one that carries more empty containers than full trailers. Unless you’ve got those figures wrong and there’s a lot more trade going both ways than you think.In which case one more truckload,but this time doing an operation in which we get the lion’s share of the job not the yank traction operations,won’t make much difference and sounds good to me.