AEC V8

Like so many others I drove many thousands of miles AEC powered and with an AEC transmission, I found occasionally they could be a bit tricky as one swapped between vehicles. Coming back to driving vehicles of an earlier era I can vouch for the difficulty a worn or poorly adjusted linkage makes to the ease of gear changing smoothly. The AEC AH470 powered Reliance I drove regularly until quite recently could be an absolute pig. With the engine some 10 ft behind the driver and a full load of passengers not just yak-yakking at full volume, but actively criticising one’s abilities and with the small overdrive D 197 'box not particularly well suited the engine or the final drive ratio, it could certainly be challenging. The vehicle cost so much in restoration and maintenance that little things like a very long and very worn gear linkage simply were not priorities. The easiest change of the lot 6 back to 5 could be so difficult with the linkage trying to select 3rd instead. 5 to 4 approaching a roundabout was also not easy because of the vehicle wanted that gear at what was naturally the wrong speed.

Leaving this sort of defect untouched leads to making the problem worse, since the dog teeth get more and more burred with the bad changing and make clean selection more difficult. In some ways this is a chicken and egg situation, did the worn teeth initially caused by bad driver timing and snatched changes in a wide ratio 'box contribute to the worn linkage

cav551:
Like so many others I drove many thousands of miles AEC powered and with an AEC transmission, I found occasionally they could be a bit tricky as one swapped between vehicles. Coming back to driving vehicles of an earlier era I can vouch for the difficulty a worn or poorly adjusted linkage makes to the ease of gear changing smoothly. The AEC AH470 powered Reliance I drove regularly until quite recently could be an absolute pig. With the engine some 10 ft behind the driver and a full load of passengers not just yak-yakking at full volume, but actively criticising one’s abilities and with the small overdrive D 197 'box not particularly well suited the engine or the final drive ratio, it could certainly be challenging. The vehicle cost so much in restoration and maintenance that little things like a very long and very worn gear linkage simply were not priorities. The easiest change of the lot 6 back to 5 could be so difficult with the linkage trying to select 3rd instead. 5 to 4 approaching a roundabout was also not easy because of the vehicle wanted that gear at what was naturally the wrong speed.

Leaving this sort of defect untouched leads to making the problem worse, since the dog teeth get more and more burred with the bad changing and make clean selection more difficult. In some ways this is a chicken and egg situation, did the worn teeth initially caused by bad driver timing and snatched changes in a wide ratio 'box contribute to the worn linkage

On the lorry linkages it was such a simple and quick adjustment, a matter of minutes to do. Also, the gear-change box bolted on the side of the engine, which the gear lever goes into, makes a big difference if it’s filled with oil. Many old AEC mechanics don’t even know that it should have oil in it.

ERF:
Great posts gingerfold!
Many thanks!.

You’ve missed the original owners of my V8 from your list - they are still very much in business!.

In your research have you found any information on a military application for the AV801 engine?
I haven’t, but I have bought quite a few V8 spares, including a brand new AV801 injection pump from military surplus retailers, and all had NSN numbers allocated to them, indicating that they had military application of some sort.

Yes, sorry about forgetting Boon Brothers, I actually saw one of theirs earlier this week when I had to go to Newmarket for a meeting.

The military applications for the AV801 would almost certainly have been static engines. Generators, pumps, welding sets etc.

Problems in service

Some or all of these have been mentioned earlier in the discussions, but I have some first hand information from former operators that I will share.

ERF has mentioned that the early engines were built to imperial measurements, but the drawings were re-sized to metric dimensions. Anecdotal evidence suggests that it was thought that the imperial engines were superior. Personally, as a non-engineer I cannot understand why that might be, but I would welcome any ideas or suggestions.

Problem 1. This was a non-engine related fault but is worth mentioning. The Mandator V8 had a new lock actuator parking brake arrangement, whereby it was an air operated system that worked on all four wheels. The brakes were locked on by mechanical means but it was not a spring brake system. A recurring fault was that the brakes would not release.

Problem 2. Severe overheating, resulting in piston seizures in extreme cases. This has been covered by ERF, causes and remedies have been noted.

Problem 3. Big end bearing weakness and short life, exacerbated by the relatively narrow crankshaft journals, dictated by the design brief of overall dimensions for a compact engine. Regular fitting of new shells at about 50,000 miles mostly kept this problem at bay.

Problem 4. Bell housing cracks and gearbox retention bolts working loose. The gearbox bolts were judged to be too thin so some operators re-tapped the stud holes and fitted thicker bolts. Problem cured. Some operators who experienced bell housing cracking replaced the aluminium bell housing with the cast iron bell housing used on industrial V8 engines.

Problem 5. The semi-automatic gearbox Mandator V8 models. These proved to be the most troublesome of all and the gearbox problems also plagued the Two-Pedal Leyland Beaver, concurrently in service with the Mandator V8. The gearbox was a 5-speed and splitter for 10 ratios. There was a normal looking gear lever that moved through a gate change and the splitter switch, air activation, was mounted on the gear stick knob. For some reason the splitter switch was very sensitive and even going over a bump in the road could cause an unwanted gear split. If it went the wrong way at full revs then it could cause a major problem. After a long high speed run the gearbox oil could boil causing damage to the internals of the 'box. Also drivers had the habit of rushing full gear changes through the gate, remember no clutch pedal to operate. The correct way to operate the Pneumo-cyclic was to pause in neutral when changing gear, just the same as with a manual constant mesh gearbox. As an aside, as a youngster the Bolton Corporation bus fleet had plenty of Leylands with the Pneumo-cyclic pedestal gearbox (no splitter) and the drivers must have been properly trained in its usage. I remember that they always paused when going up and down the 'box.

AEC instigated a policy of offering to buy back troublesome Mandator V8s. Hipwood and Grundy with eleven semi-automatics took up the offer and they were replaced with AV760 Mandators. Other operators persevered with the V8, believing in its potential. At least two of the former Hipwood and Grundy V8s saw further service in the AEC Works Transport fleet. These were VTG4R 194 and 198, registered RTE 764G and RTE 766G respectively.

To be continued…

Just purely for interest, this is my list of surviving V8’s, and their state as of 2015.

VTG4R 024 - RKJ 512G - Johnson Bros - Derelict (cut in half, front end complete).
VTG4R 026 - PJU 365G - J Brindley (then Rosser) - Derelict (spares source).
VTG4R 030 - RKL 799G - Johnson Bros - Converted to recovery vehicle. Stored.
VTG4R 033 - GBH 93G - Scott Meats - Stored.
VTG4R 050 - NOD 906G - Bradleys - Under restoration.
VTG4R 054 - LET 472G - Wilf Harrison - Derelict (photo on TN).
VTG4R 084 - FFP 998G - Trumans Brewery - Restored.
VTG4R 137 - CGX 259H - R.T.I.T.B. - Stored.
VTG4R 208 - NJE 514H - Boon Bros - Under restoration.
VTG4R 209 - OJL 284H - Benton Bros - Rolling chassis only. Under restoration.
VTG4R 225 - RWO 533G - Alcan - Stored (N Ireland).
VTG4R 329 - WYM 134H - Hays - Derelict (No cab - RGM).
2VTG4R 355 - SCA 841J - R.T.I.T.B. - Restored.
VTG4R 357 - VRF 497G - Air Products - Derelict (RGM).
VTG4R 405 - OCE 829H - R.T.I.T.B - Restored.
VTG4R 406 - LVL 164H - Clayton Dewandre - Restored

VTG4R ■■? - ■■? ■■? - Air Products - Derelict (RGM).
2VTG4R7E ■■? - DN 3744 - Mobil Oil (New Zealand) - Reimported to UK 2014.

There are at least another three V8’s surviving in New Zealand or Australia, but I have no details.

Another V8 was imported from New Zealand some years ago. This vehicle was used as a recovery vehicle at Lyttelton road Tunnel in NZ, and was fitted with a Detroit 6V71 engine at some point which necessitated cutting most of the centre cab floor away, as it proved impossible to house the Detroit engine within the space occupied by the original AEC V8 unit. Fitting of the Detroit 8V71 engine into the Mandator V8 chassis proved to be impossible due to the extra space required by the Detroit.
This lorry is believed to be in Northern Ireland now, and is VTG4R7E 163, new to Shell Oil (New Zealand).

dessert driver:
Hi Boys
Great posts from all
gingerfold my father Peter Millington from Whitchurch Shropshire brought a new V8 Mandator from Lex Tilotsons in Trafford Park in 1969, I know it was fitted with a 6 speed box but have you got any other info on it.
Thanks in advance
Regard Keith

Could this be VTG4R 394 - XDM 3G - (24/3/1969)
‘Millington’ listed as original customer in Graham’s book.

gingerfold:
Continuing the miscellaneous jottings.
Firstly, to clarify and add to some of ERF’s comments.

The high datum 2VTG4R models. ERF is quite correct in stating that there were two chassis rail depths, viz 10 inches and 12 inches. The latter being export specification whereby unladen weight was not the same issue as it was in the UK. Here weight saving was always a prime consideration, dictated by the requirements of stringent C&U Regulations and the quantity A Licence rules then applicable in the 1960s. Anyway here are details of the first five high datum cab V8s; for certain all went to UK customers.
2VTG4R 051, 28/03/68, OFJ 472G, customer Cobden.
2VTG4R 054, 18/6/68, LET 472G, customer Wilfred Harrison
2VTG4R 055, 10/7/68, reg. no. not recorded, customer Liquids Powders and Gases (L.P.G)
2VTG4R 056, 12/2/68, reg. no. not recorded, customer L.P.G
2VTG4R 057, 12/7/68, reg. no. PVA 429G, customer Sam Anderson

ERF also mentions VTG4L 001. This was the Commercial Vehicle Show exhibit in 1968.

Continuing the theme of chassis numbers, then the highest chassis number allocated to a customer’s vehicle, and used, was 2VTG4R 433. This was registered VYS 606H, built in December 1969 and bought by the South of Scotland Electricity Board. The latest registrations were “J” plates, built in the last quarter of 1969. VTG4R 407, YTR 227J, Goulden, VTG4R 408, YTR 272J, R.A. Lane, and 2VTGR4R7, LWC 466J, Bank of England (!).

2VTG4R 456 was built in November 1969 for AEC Experimental Department.

There was one oddball chassis number, viz 2VTG4L7 002, which was a 15 ft. 9 inches load carrier chassis that was exported to Blanc and Paiche in Switzerland. Built in January 1970.

Some of the New Zealand V8s were stretched into six-wheeler load carriers.

Approximately 65 chassis numbers within the sequential model series were allocated,but chassis were not built against them. With problems in service with Mandator V8s, AEC experienced customer order cancellations throughout the 23 months of production.

One final Mandator V8 was definitely assembled in 1971 for the proposed re-launch of the lorry in September of that year. This was subsequently cancelled. There was also the 3VTG 6x4 concept tractor unit with American look-alike cab.

AEC Mammoth Major V8 6x4 Tractor Units.
Towards the end of 1968 AEC announced the above models, available in either right or left hand drive. A handful of both versions were built, all with the AVM/801 engine rated at 272 bhp. All had the high datum cab and the identical gearbox options as the Mandator V8 were available. Gross train weights could be 44, 56, or 65 tons. Depending on gross weight various AEC or Leyland Group rear axles could be specified with either 2-spring or 4-spring suspension. VYE 632G was one such 6x4 built. It had the 10-speed semi-automatic gearbox and AEC rear bogie. Somewhat surprisingly it went to BRS.

And, this is the mystery Mammoth Major V8. Given an experimental designation 2VTG6R 4A019 it was completed as late as March 1973. Originally owned by CVS (Morley) Ltd. it is known to have been sold of at some time by British Car Auctions at Brighouse. Since then its whereabouts are unknown.

Other AEC V8 engine applications.
As already mentioned, various industrial uses, all AVM/801 variants in generators, pumps, compressors etc. No marine versions are thought to have been produced. But then again it was believed that no V8s had been used in mobile cranes despite comprehensive sets of drawings being produced for Coles Cranes, who were a very big user of AEC engines. At least one V8 powered Coles Crane did eventually become known, still in service as late as 1998.

The AEC V8 Sabre Coach.
Four, possibly five, AEC V8 Sabre coaches were assembled to a rear engine design. One went to Autocars in Israel (badged as a Leyland), and this had been a 1968 Commercial Motor Show exhibit. A left hand control chassis went to UTIC in Portugal, long-standing users of AECs. Another went to Australia in 1969, and the final Sabre remained in the UK. One Sabre was definitely exhibited at the 1970 Commercial Motor Show, why? No one knows, and it was reportedly dismantled afterwards on the orders of a senior Leyland executive. What is beyond doubt is that one V8 Sabre saw many years of service in the UK. With a cherished registration SAB 784 it carries an ECW luxury body and as far as I know it still exists.

Scammell Crusader V8
At least one Scammell Crusader 6x4 tractor unit was built with AVM/801 engine mated to a 9-speed Fuller gearbox.

Subsequent V8 engine development after suspension of the Mandator V8 in late 1969.
Photographic and documented evidence exists showing that AEC continued some improving and development work on the V8 until mid-1971. As early as January 1969 AEC was conducting test-bed trials on a turbo-charged V8-800 which was achieving 350 bhp at 2,600 rpm. The torque was 824 lb. ft. @ 1,500 rpm. This engine had twin Holset-Schwitzer type 3LD turbo-chargers with an oil cooler located in the pressure circuit of the lubricating system. Of interest because of ERF’s recent posts, the cylinder heads of this test engine were re-designed to allow increased valve lift and Leyland’s design of directed ports.

Another great post Graham , did any of the 350 bhp`s they were testing survive or go on the road?

ERF:
Just purely for interest, this is my list of surviving V8’s, and their state as of 2015.

VTG4R 024 - RKJ 512G - Johnson Bros - Derelict (cut in half, front end complete).
VTG4R 026 - PJU 365G - J Brindley (then Rosser) - Derelict (spares source).
VTG4R 030 - RKL 799G - Johnson Bros - Converted to recovery vehicle. Stored.
VTG4R 033 - GBH 93G - Scott Meats - Stored.
VTG4R 050 - NOD 906G - Bradleys - Under restoration.
VTG4R 054 - LET 472G - Wilf Harrison - Derelict (photo on TN).
VTG4R 084 - FFP 998G - Trumans Brewery - Restored.
VTG4R 137 - CGX 259H - R.T.I.T.B. - Stored.
VTG4R 208 - NJE 514H - Boon Bros - Under restoration.
VTG4R 209 - OJL 284H - Benton Bros - Rolling chassis only. Under restoration.
VTG4R 225 - RWO 533G - Alcan - Stored (N Ireland).
VTG4R 329 - WYM 134H - Hays - Derelict (No cab - RGM).
2VTG4R 355 - SCA 841J - R.T.I.T.B. - Restored.
VTG4R 357 - VRF 497G - Air Products - Derelict (RGM).
VTG4R 405 - OCE 829H - R.T.I.T.B - Restored.
VTG4R 406 - LVL 164H - Clayton Dewandre - Restored

VTG4R ■■? - ■■? ■■? - Air Products - Derelict (RGM).
2VTG4R7E ■■? - DN 3744 - Mobil Oil (New Zealand) - Reimported to UK 2014.

There are at least another three V8’s surviving in New Zealand or Australia, but I have no details.

Another V8 was imported from New Zealand some years ago. This vehicle was used as a recovery vehicle at Lyttelton road Tunnel in NZ, and was fitted with a Detroit 6V71 engine at some point which necessitated cutting most of the centre cab floor away, as it proved impossible to house the Detroit engine within the space occupied by the original AEC V8 unit. Fitting of the Detroit 8V71 engine into the Mandator V8 chassis proved to be impossible due to the extra space required by the Detroit.
This lorry is believed to be in Northern Ireland now, and is VTG4R7E 163, new to Shell Oil (New Zealand).

There is another surviving V8 I cant see on the list RNW634G owned and restored by Mark Wiltshire from Bristol I’m sure his is fitted with a 9 speed fuller but don’t think it was originally .
My step father worked for Western Transport in Bristol can remember the V8 they had on evaluation but don’t think they bought any carried on buying the 6 cylinder ones right up to when production stopped .

The Turners of Soham prototype Mandator V8, VTG4R 005, NGJ 294D.

When I joined Turners in 1990 their prototype V8 had been gone for 20 years, but one day a group of drivers were discussing the lorry and it was this discussion that made me start to research the AEC V8 project, vehicles, engines, and service life. As an unrepentant AEC fan, and that will never change, I believe that failures as well as successes must be documented. As I stated a few posts back AEC was pushing engineering boundaries with this project and that is how progress is made. Should we condemn AEC and the Mandator V8? In my opinion, no not at all. The opprobrious comments meted out by some are totally unwarranted and with the great benefit of hindsight anyone can be a contemptuous and dismissive poster.

At the time Turners got their V8 the company had placed orders with AEC for 50 tilt cabbed models; Mandators, Mercurys, and a few Marshals. They were still running some Mammoth Major Mk.111 eight wheelers and GM6 Marshal six-wheelers. The V8 was double-shifted on intensive working schedules. It was usually driven by the same day driver and the same night driver, but in the course of its three years service life at Turners many others drove it as holiday cover etc. It’s startling performance was still talked about in the 1990s. it was monitored by AEC service engineers and after its first six months of intensive operating it went back to Southall for an engine change. Apart from overheating there had been few other problems with it. It had never needed to be recovered because of a breakdown I can confirm that its original engine was a four rocker cover unit, and this was replaced with a two rocker cover version. It also had fitted at various times a 6-speed o/d gearbox, a 10-speed splitter, and a 10-speed range change. The 10-speed splitter was the preferred choice of the drivers. Some drivers commented that at time the engine used to “run wild” and it was “uncontrollable”; probably symptoms of the fuel pump governor problem mentioned earlier in the thread.

Two drivers’ tales about the performance of the V8. I don’t doubt the veracity of these stories, but maybe they were embellished over the years.

Day driver was in a cafe somewhere in the Stevenage area on the A1, heading north with 20 tons on the trailer. Another driver, whom he knew, came into the cafe and started bragging about his new Swedish lorry and what it would do. Turners driver told the other driver to get going whilst he had another mug of tea and he would see him at Tony’s cafe, Grantham. The Mandator, having given the Swede a 15 minutes head start, passed it between Peterborough and Stamford.

On another occasion the V8 and a Turners Mammoth Major Mk.III left British Sugar Ely factory at the same time, destined for Tate and Lyle Liverpool, both loaded with raw sugar for refining. The V8 passed the Mammoth Major near Stoke… but the V8 had been to Liverpool and tipped and was on the way back. When this tale was recounted to me by the Mandator driver, the Mammoth Major driver was present and he agreed with his mate. Turners drivers were paid on a productivity scheme, so they didn’t need to drag a job out to earn their wages.

The Turners prototype was sold after three years service and it was bought by an owner driver from Wisbech, Brian Misson. I spoke to Brian and he ran the V8 for about 4 years, mainly trouble free as he recalled. He did remember that it could still run hot and if he had to stop after a hill climb, then he had to keep the engine running at a fast tick over to let it cool down, otherwise it could pick up a piston. He never had a piston seizure that warranted an engine strip down. He too changed big end shells annually. Brian sold NGJ 294D to Rush Green Motors as a part exchange trade in. I did search Rush Green as best as it was possible in the 1990s trying to find it but it was not there. There were the remains of two other V8 Mandators languishing in the graveyard at that time.

To be continued…

I was going to post a list of survivors, but ERF has beaten me to it, and he has tracked down more than me. It’s remarkable that so many have survived and out of 309 or so in service in this country then the % of survivors, running, or restorable is surprising. In percentage terms it’s far higher than any other mid-1960s model that only had a two-year production life. A family called Lowe in NZ was restoring a V8, is this the one you refer to? It had been a 6-wheeler conversion and they were putting it back to a tractor unit. (They also ran Marathons…)

I was searching through a drawer this morning and lying at the bottom there were three photos of V8s in New Zealand, including one of the six-wheeler conversions. I disposed of my photo collection 6 years ago (regret that now) but those slipped through the net. I’ll scan them and post them.

gingerfold:
?..A family called Lowe in NZ was restoring a V8, is this the one you refer to? It had been a 6-wheeler conversion and they were putting it back to a tractor unit. (They also ran Marathons…)

I don’t think it is the one that has been imported most recently, as I’m fairly sure that has always been a 4x2 unit. I did find out from Ron Phillips at the BCVM when he searched the records for us that most (if not all?) of the CKD Mandator V8 kits supplied to New Zealand went out supplied with chassis rails long enough to build up as a load carrier, or be shortened to a 4x2 tractor unit. These were of course all 12 inch deep rails.

gingerfold:
… I disposed of my photo collection 6 years ago (regret that now)…

That’s a real shame - you are the one person I knew took a photo of my V8 before we moved it from it’s resting place of many years. My own photos were lost many years ago, but I have always held out some hope that your photos of it would surface one day!. :frowning:

logger:
There is another surviving V8 I cant see on the list RNW634G owned and restored by Mark Wiltshire from Bristol I’m sure his is fitted with a 9 speed fuller but don’t think it was originally…

You are absolutely correct, I completely missed RNW 634G for inexplicable reasons!. Sorry about that.
I don’t actually have a chassis number recorded for it, although I remember the vehicle from it’s very first appearance at Wollaton Park in 1993?, so at this stage I can’t add it into my list in it’s appropriate place.
Can anyone help?

gingerfold:
…Brian sold NGJ 294D to Rush Green Motors as a part exchange trade in. I did search Rush Green as best as it was possible in the 1990s trying to find it but it was not there. There were the remains of two other V8 Mandators languishing in the graveyard at that time…

There is every chance that at least the chassis is still in there.
We found three almost complete V8’s in there, two ex Air Products and one ex Hays. There was the engine from another Air Products V8 on the scrap heap, and just the rotten cab from an Electrolux V8 on top of a pile of other cabs!. The yard is currently being cleared, so if another V8 chassis appears it is sure to be recorded, as lots of keen eyes are trained on the happenings there!.

Opinions of Mandator V8s from operators and drivers.

The following reports were obtained by written or verbal communications.

From the Fleet Engineer of British Gypsum, Kirkby Thore. Norman Cowans was a fitter in 1969 when the first of their 13 V8s entered service. He wrote to me that their Mandator V8s overheated, and if it resulted in a piston seizure then it was always number 4 piston that picked up on the liner. They also had the gearbox bolt problems and remedied the problem with the solution mentioned earlier. There were bad oil leaks from somewhere near the fuel injection pump and oil would funnel backwards down the V and deposit itself on the bell-housing. Despite these problems the performance of the V8s was unmatched by any other lorries they ran.

Tim Kennard was a driver for A. & R.J. Wood of Sittingbourne and they had two V8s in an almost entire AEC fleet. Because of problems the V8s were replaced after 12 months. Their usual work was loads of newsprint from Kent to Leicester daily. Frequent visits were made to the AEC / Leyland service centre at Aldenham on the return trip. The usual problems were water leaks and head gasket faults. Tim stated that when on song the V8s were “brilliant”, and some of the standard AV760 Mandators started to give trouble as those drivers tried to keep up with the V8s.

Ron Sinclair of Evesham ran six V8s and he used cast iron bell-housings to replace cracked aluminium ones. His V8s reduced the journey time from Evesham to Glasgow by one and a half hours compared with the timings of standard Mandators. Ron Sinclair was adamant that the V8 was “20 years ahead of its time” and that it had great potential. Ron was approached by Perkins who requested an out of service Mandator V8 for road testing of its new V8 engine. YNP 80G was used and a Perkins V8-640 was installed. After testing and modifications a turbo-charged version was then installed, rated at 300 bhp. This engine type became Perkins T640, a special applications engine.

Other casual conversations over the years with former drivers and operators confirm the above. In every conversation the performance of the Mandator V8 was always mentioned and how it was unsurpassed at the time.

ERF:
Fitting of the Detroit 8V71 engine into the Mandator V8 chassis proved to be impossible due to the extra space required by the Detroit.

3ft 11’’ long x 3ft 3’’ wide x 4ft 3’’ high.How did that compare with the AEC ?.Would the ‘high datum’ Ergo have made any difference or was it an issue of the block width not fitting between the chassis rails ?.

Contrary to Friars’ comments and as logically referred to by nmm,all the signs are that the V8 was specifically designed first and foremost to fit in the Mandator and everything else was then a compromise around that.While having said that it looks as though that design brief was possibly deliberately hidden from Friars by Fogg and Roberts in the knowledge that he would have been against it ?.On that note it would be interesting to find out exactly what Friars meant by ( horrified ) and how many others,if any,shared that view among AEC’s engineering design staff.Obviously not horrified enough to resign which I would have been in not wanting to be associated with it.

gingerfold:
Problem 3. Big end bearing weakness and short life, exacerbated by the relatively narrow crankshaft journals, dictated by the design brief of overall dimensions for a compact engine. Regular fitting of new shells at about 50,000 miles mostly kept this problem at bay.

I don’t think that would have been any more acceptable to customers then as it would be today.While it would be rare for any inherent bottom end bearing design flaw sufficient to cause premature wear of the shells to not also damage the crankshaft journals by the point when the shells became unserviceable even on a preventative basis.In this case bearing in mind not only the compromised bearing area but also the extra force being applied to the rod to compensate for the severely compromised ( and make no mistake 114 mm was ‘severely compromised’ ) leverage to create what torque it had,combined with the resulting relatively high engine speeds.

gingerfold:
…Ron was approached by Perkins who requested an out of service Mandator V8 for road testing of its new V8 engine. YNP 80G was used and a Perkins V8-640 was installed. After testing and modifications a turbo-charged version was then installed, rated at 300 bhp. This engine type became Perkins T640, a special applications engine…

An interesting story with this one too. After (or maybe during) it’s period with Perkins, YNP 80G saw further service with a Derbyshire haulier with it’s Perkins T640 engine. The original AEC V8 engine was actually retained by Perkins, but they had already managed to get hold of an AEC engine some time earlier which they dismantled and forensically examined for useful information relevant to their own V8 engine developments. This first engine was rebuilt and tested to destruction at Scott Gibbons Ltd (who did the Perkins dynamometer engine testing in Peterborough), after which it was examined again by Perkins engineers. From all this involvement, the Perkins engineers held a great deal of respect for the original AEC team, and their ambition to create such an advanced engine. I had it first hand from one of the senior Perkins engineers that in his opinion they so very nearly got it right, but as he said, to get an all new engine off the drawing board and into a successful running engine, and get it right at the first attempt in the mid 1960’s was an impossible task.

Getting back to YNP 80G, Perkins kept hold of it’s original AEC V8 engine for many years after the lorry was disposed of. In 1990 Bill Ratcliffe, who as some will remember was a very enthusiastic operator of AEC recovery machinery on the A1, knew of my V8 restoration and put me in direct touch with Perkins to obtain the engine for spares, but unbelievably after around fifteen years of storing it, they had just sent it for scrap!. The story doesn’t end there though. The manager at the metal processing facility used by Perkins in Peterborough was a former driver at the company who owned my V8, and he instructed his staff to turn their yard upside down to look for the engine, but to no avail, it had already been fragmented unfortunately!.

ERF:

dessert driver:
Hi Boys
Great posts from all
gingerfold my father Peter Millington from Whitchurch Shropshire brought a new V8 Mandator from Lex Tilotsons in Trafford Park in 1969, I know it was fitted with a 6 speed box but have you got any other info on it.
Thanks in advance
Regard Keith

Could this be VTG4R 394 - XDM 3G - (24/3/1969)
‘Millington’ listed as original customer in Graham’s book.

Thank You

ERF:
An interesting story with this one too. After (or maybe during) it’s period with Perkins, YNP 80G saw further service with a Derbyshire haulier with it’s Perkins T640 engine. The original AEC V8 engine was actually retained by Perkins, but they had already managed to get hold of an AEC engine some time earlier which they dismantled and forensically examined for useful information relevant to their own V8 engine developments. This first engine was rebuilt and tested to destruction at Scott Gibbons Ltd (who did the Perkins dynamometer engine testing in Peterborough), after which it was examined again by Perkins engineers. From all this involvement, the Perkins engineers held a great deal of respect for the original AEC team, and their ambition to create such an advanced engine. I had it first hand from one of the senior Perkins engineers that in his opinion they so very nearly got it right, but as he said, to get an all new engine off the drawing board and into a successful running engine, and get it right at the first attempt in the mid 1960’s was an impossible task.

To be fair going to 117 x 120 from 130 x 114 is a bit more than even ‘nearly’ got it right.That’s a totally opposite under square design premise.

Which leaves the question why didn’t Perkins retain the AEC bore/stroke ratio bearing in mind the same max rated engine speed ?.On that note so very nearly got it right is obviously a lot more expectedly diplomatic among similar professionals than Fogg and Roberts got it all so very catastrophically wrong. :bulb: :wink:

Frankydobo:
Nice collection of info ERF it stirs the memories, just wish I’d had the forethought to hang onto brochures etc when I was at the AEC dealership, I did gather some from different makers dealerships later when collecting parts during the 80’s, which I suppose is also considered vintage now.

Thanks for the reply Gingerfold most informative, I don’t suppose, if you have access to records of Mammoth Minors sold with customer details etc similar to the Mandator ones you quote, that you could possibly seek out the reg no and more of one Mammoth Minor unit sold to Alfred W Ellis of Newcastle, it may well have been an E or F Reg but I can’t be more sure than that, I would like to be able to put a correct Reg No to the model I built a few years ago of this unit.
Cheers Franky.

Sorry Franky, I don’t have any Mammoth Minor records to hand. They are in the archives at BCVM Leyland.