it’s just a matter of time until what are just a bunch of mentally disturbed zealots are allowed to take over the asylum if they aren’t stopped.
CarryfastSENIOR MEMBER Posts: 10586Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 6:45 pm
Too late for that, I’m afraid.( I really am!)
harry:
it’s just a matter of time until what are just a bunch of mentally disturbed zealots are allowed to take over the asylum if they aren’t stopped.
CarryfastSENIOR MEMBER Posts: 10586Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 6:45 pmToo late for that, I’m afraid.( I really am!)
Carryfast:
What a surprise a typical believer in the bs global warming theory,when asked to provide something as simple,as the figures showing a direct link,between Earth’s atmospheric CO2 and day to day temperatures,can’t do it because the figures don’t exist.It’s no surprise that just like any global warming believer you then try to justify your cause by posting a load of bs propaganda none of which answers the question.Assuming that my statements concerning temperatures in the Polar regions aren’t valid then why should the believers continuous references to same be considered as any more valid.Although at least the references that I’m relying on are based on facts not bs.The fact is the global warmist cause is as dangerous as Communism and Religeous extremism like the Taliban in that it’s just a matter of time until what are just a bunch of mentally disturbed zealots are allowed to take over the asylum if they aren’t stopped.
Did you read any of the links? Can you refute anything in them (properly, I mean, not just with your usual blanket dismissal of anything with which you disagree)? There are plenty of figures in those links if you’ll only open your mind a little … I’m just off to read the links you’ve provided.
Well, I note the links you provided are remarkably free of anything which could be called “science”, let alone figures. No references, no peer review, no actual research … it’s just some bloke shouting “climate change is wrong!!” Is it your own blog, by any chance?
Find me some reputable research in a proper academic journal like Nature or Proceedings of the Royal Society which backs up your point of view, then we can have a debate. Until then, stop wasting my time with your demented burblings.
Rhythm Thief:
Carryfast:
What a surprise a typical believer in the bs global warming theory,when asked to provide something as simple,as the figures showing a direct link,between Earth’s atmospheric CO2 and day to day temperatures,can’t do it because the figures don’t exist.It’s no surprise that just like any global warming believer you then try to justify your cause by posting a load of bs propaganda none of which answers the question.Assuming that my statements concerning temperatures in the Polar regions aren’t valid then why should the believers continuous references to same be considered as any more valid.Although at least the references that I’m relying on are based on facts not bs.The fact is the global warmist cause is as dangerous as Communism and Religeous extremism like the Taliban in that it’s just a matter of time until what are just a bunch of mentally disturbed zealots are allowed to take over the asylum if they aren’t stopped.Did you read any of the links? Can you refute anything in them (properly, I mean, not just with your usual blanket dismissal of anything with which you disagree)? There are plenty of figures in those links if you’ll only open your mind a little … I’m just off to read the links you’ve provided.
Why would I want to open my mind to a bs theory based on a flawed extrapolation of the situation on Venus as opposed to Earth.The fact is if we burn all of Earth’s fossil fuel the amount of CO2 released would make no noticeable difference or cause any runaway greenhouse effect on Earth simply because it’s just a case adding an even more minute amount of CO2 to an already minute amount of CO2 in our atmosphere and bearing in mind that CO2 is heavier than air.As everyone knows it’s mainly water vapour which is the main ingredient of Earth’s ( beneficial ) greenhouse effect.As opposed to Venus’ supposedly runaway one which isn’t a case of ‘because it’s CO2’ but it’s a case of simply too much atmsosphere and resulting atmospheric pressure regardless of it’s composition. 
Carryfast:
Why would I want to open my mind …
Because, my love, that’s how you learn New Things. Bless.
Rhythm Thief:
Carryfast:
Why would I want to open my mind …Because, my love, that’s how you learn New Things. Bless.
I think that’s the logic which that mad hippy Sagan was using when he came to his dope fuelled conclusions based on those photographs from Venus. 
Certainly Sagan (like most scientists) had an open mind.
Rhythm Thief:
Certainly Sagan (like most scientists) had an open mind.
In this case it’s just that it was too open fuelled by drugs in the form of waccy baccy.A bit like anyone who believes that Star Trek is real not fiction.
Rhythm Thief:
Certainly Sagan (like most scientists) had an open mind.
I see you’ve encountered Carryfast! I do hope you’re stuck in some poxy RDC waiting room with absolutely nothing better to do for some time… 
Carryfast wrote:Why would I want to open my mind …
because you just might find that you are completely biased and wrong most of the time…simple really.
nick2008:
Nows a good time to get the unemployed to earn their hand outs is it not …
■■■■
Rat67:
nick2008:
Nows a good time to get the unemployed to earn their hand outs is it not …■■■■
Sounded like a good idea, filling sandbags.
albion1971:
Carryfast wrote:Why would I want to open my mind …because you just might find that you are completely biased and wrong most of the time…simple really.
There’s no danger of him ever realising that …
Rat67:
nick2008:
Nows a good time to get the unemployed to earn their hand outs is it not …■■■■
It seems the unemployed don’t like the idea of having to earn their hand outs.
Rhythm Thief:
albion1971:
Carryfast wrote:Why would I want to open my mind …because you just might find that you are completely biased and wrong most of the time…simple really.
There’s no danger of him ever realising that …
Which has always been the left wingers’ reply of choice when anyone dares to challenge their bs ideology.It’s obvious who’s wrong and biased in the case of the bs global warming agenda.
Contraflow:
Rat67:
nick2008:
Nows a good time to get the unemployed to earn their hand outs is it not …■■■■
It seems the unemployed don’t like the idea of having to earn their hand outs.
Sorry to disappoint you Contraflow, in full time employment, but getting heartily sick and tired of the self-righteous pompous Jeremy Kyle wannabes spouting the same old “I pay for their benefits with my taxes ■■■■■■■■ blah blah blah national service blah blah they don’t want to work…” and on and on and on. Some pillocks on this forum are just so full of it with their holier-than-thou attitude, it gets really old, really quickly. Try living on benefits for a while and see how ■■■■■■■ easy it is you know all ■■■■■
Carryfast:
Rhythm Thief:
albion1971:
Carryfast wrote:Why would I want to open my mind …because you just might find that you are completely biased and wrong most of the time…simple really.
There’s no danger of him ever realising that …
Which has always been the left wingers’ reply of choice when anyone dares to challenge their bs ideology.It’s obvious who’s wrong and biased in the case of the bs global warming agenda.
Aye, duck. Seems I was right.
You got that scientific paper published yet? Or have you realised that your only line of, er, argument is “Carl Sagan liked his weed”? You do know Sagan is not the only scientist to back up global warming theory, don’t you? And that a fondness for weed is not necessarily inconsistent with a scintillating scientific career? Can you refute any of the science behind climate change? Do you know anything of ice core analysis? Or palaeoclimate reconstruction using pollen data? Any chance you could enlighten us about what analysis methods you could use to obtain palaoeclimatic data from a peat core? Might you one day acknowledge that science - proper, “hard”, rigorous, peer reviewed science - involves rather more work than your own method of Googling, and then cherrypicking a couple of results which back up your preconceived views while automatically dismissing any which don’t? I’m not holding my breath …
Rat67:
Contraflow:
Rat67:
nick2008:
Nows a good time to get the unemployed to earn their hand outs is it not …■■■■
It seems the unemployed don’t like the idea of having to earn their hand outs.
Sorry to disappoint you Contraflow, in full time employment, but getting heartily sick and tired of the self-righteous pompous Jeremy Kyle wannabes spouting the same old “I pay for their benefits with my taxes [zb] blah blah blah national service blah blah they don’t want to work…” and on and on and on. Some pillocks on this forum are just so full of it with their holier-than-thou attitude, it gets really old, really quickly. Try living on benefits for a while and see how [zb] easy it is you know all [zb]
Yeah ■■■■ them all , benefits should be stopped after six weeks , soon see who cannot find paid employment. Alternatively just Nuke the North and be done with it
flat to the mat:
Rat67:
Contraflow:
Rat67:
nick2008:
Nows a good time to get the unemployed to earn their hand outs is it not …■■■■
It seems the unemployed don’t like the idea of having to earn their hand outs.
Sorry to disappoint you Contraflow, in full time employment, but getting heartily sick and tired of the self-righteous pompous Jeremy Kyle wannabes spouting the same old “I pay for their benefits with my taxes [zb] blah blah blah national service blah blah they don’t want to work…” and on and on and on. Some pillocks on this forum are just so full of it with their holier-than-thou attitude, it gets really old, really quickly. Try living on benefits for a while and see how [zb] easy it is you know all [zb]
Yeah [zb] them all , benefits should be stopped after six weeks , soon see who cannot find paid employment. Alternatively just Nuke the North and be done with it
LOL! Nuke the North & flood the South!Way to go .mat!
Lets create the Scottish Channel?